Literature DB >> 36147501

Identification of a signature of evolutionarily conserved stress-induced mutagenesis in cancer.

Luis H Cisneros1,2, Charles Vaske1, Kimberly J Bussey1,2,3.   

Abstract

The clustering of mutations observed in cancer cells is reminiscent of the stress-induced mutagenesis (SIM) response in bacteria. Bacteria deploy SIM when faced with DNA double-strand breaks in the presence of conditions that elicit an SOS response. SIM employs DinB, the evolutionary precursor to human trans-lesion synthesis (TLS) error-prone polymerases, and results in mutations concentrated around DNA double-strand breaks with an abundance that decays with distance. We performed a quantitative study on single nucleotide variant calls for whole-genome sequencing data from 1950 tumors, non-inherited mutations from 129 normal samples, and acquired mutations in 3 cell line models of stress-induced adaptive mutation. We introduce statistical methods to identify mutational clusters, quantify their shapes and tease out the potential mechanism that produced them. Our results show that mutations in both normal and cancer samples are indeed clustered and have shapes indicative of SIM. Clusters in normal samples occur more often in the same genomic location across samples than in cancer suggesting loss of regulation over the mutational process during carcinogenesis. Additionally, the signatures of TLS contribute the most to mutational cluster formation in both patient samples as well as experimental models of SIM. Furthermore, a measure of cluster shape heterogeneity was associated with cancer patient survival with a hazard ratio of 5.744 (Cox Proportional Hazard Regression, 95% CI: 1.824-18.09). Our results support the conclusion that the ancient and evolutionary-conserved adaptive mutation response found in bacteria is a source of genomic instability in cancer. Biological adaptation through SIM might explain the ability of tumors to evolve in the face of strong selective pressures such as treatment and suggests that the conventional 'hit it hard' approaches to therapy could prove themselves counterproductive.
Copyright © 2022 Cisneros, Vaske and Bussey.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; cancer evolution; evolution; intratumor heterogeneity; mutational clusters; stress induced mutagenesis; trans-lesion DNA synthesis

Year:  2022        PMID: 36147501      PMCID: PMC9488704          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.932763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.772


  63 in total

1.  The SOS response regulates adaptive mutation.

Authors:  G J McKenzie; R S Harris; P L Lee; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ancient hot and cold genes and chemotherapy resistance emergence.

Authors:  Amy Wu; Qiucen Zhang; Guillaume Lambert; Zayar Khin; Robert A Gatenby; Hyunsung John Kim; Nader Pourmand; Kimberly Bussey; Paul C W Davies; James C Sturm; Robert H Austin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Lauren S Waters; Brenda K Minesinger; Mary Ellen Wiltrout; Sanjay D'Souza; Rachel V Woodruff; Graham C Walker
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  MTOR signaling orchestrates stress-induced mutagenesis, facilitating adaptive evolution in cancer.

Authors:  Arcadi Cipponi; David L Goode; Justin Bedo; Mark J McCabe; Marina Pajic; David R Croucher; Alvaro Gonzalez Rajal; Simon R Junankar; Darren N Saunders; Pavel Lobachevsky; Anthony T Papenfuss; Danielle Nessem; Max Nobis; Sean C Warren; Paul Timpson; Mark Cowley; Ana C Vargas; Min R Qiu; Daniele G Generali; Shivakumar Keerthikumar; Uyen Nguyen; Niall M Corcoran; Georgina V Long; Jean-Yves Blay; David M Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Clustered Mutation Signatures Reveal that Error-Prone DNA Repair Targets Mutations to Active Genes.

Authors:  Fran Supek; Ben Lehner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Context is everything: aneuploidy in cancer.

Authors:  Uri Ben-David; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Ancient genes establish stress-induced mutation as a hallmark of cancer.

Authors:  Luis Cisneros; Kimberly J Bussey; Adam J Orr; Milica Miočević; Charles H Lineweaver; Paul Davies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Isidro Cortés-Ciriano; Jake June-Koo Lee; Ruibin Xi; Dhawal Jain; Youngsook L Jung; Lixing Yang; Dmitry Gordenin; Leszek J Klimczak; Cheng-Zhong Zhang; David S Pellman; Peter J Park
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Mutations in the RAS/MAPK Pathway Drive Replication Repair-Deficient Hypermutated Tumors and Confer Sensitivity to MEK Inhibition.

Authors:  Brittany B Campbell; Melissa A Galati; Simone C Stone; Alexandra N Riemenschneider; Melissa Edwards; Sumedha Sudhaman; Robert Siddaway; Martin Komosa; Nuno M Nunes; Liana Nobre; A Sorana Morrissy; Matthew Zatzman; Michal Zapotocky; Lazar Joksimovic; Sangeetha N Kalimuthu; David Samuel; Gary Mason; Eric Bouffet; Daniel A Morgenstern; Melyssa Aronson; Carol Durno; David Malkin; John M Maris; Michael D Taylor; Adam Shlien; Trevor J Pugh; Pamela S Ohashi; Cynthia E Hawkins; Uri Tabori
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 39.397

10.  Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences.

Authors:  Serena Nik-Zainal; Helen Davies; Johan Staaf; Manasa Ramakrishna; Dominik Glodzik; Xueqing Zou; Inigo Martincorena; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Sancha Martin; David C Wedge; Peter Van Loo; Young Seok Ju; Marcel Smid; Arie B Brinkman; Sandro Morganella; Miriam R Aure; Ole Christian Lingjærde; Anita Langerød; Markus Ringnér; Sung-Min Ahn; Sandrine Boyault; Jane E Brock; Annegien Broeks; Adam Butler; Christine Desmedt; Luc Dirix; Serge Dronov; Aquila Fatima; John A Foekens; Moritz Gerstung; Gerrit K J Hooijer; Se Jin Jang; David R Jones; Hyung-Yong Kim; Tari A King; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Hee Jin Lee; Jeong-Yeon Lee; Yilong Li; Stuart McLaren; Andrew Menzies; Ville Mustonen; Sarah O'Meara; Iris Pauporté; Xavier Pivot; Colin A Purdie; Keiran Raine; Kamna Ramakrishnan; F Germán Rodríguez-González; Gilles Romieu; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Peter T Simpson; Rebecca Shepherd; Lucy Stebbings; Olafur A Stefansson; Jon Teague; Stefania Tommasi; Isabelle Treilleux; Gert G Van den Eynden; Peter Vermeulen; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Lucy Yates; Carlos Caldas; Laura van't Veer; Andrew Tutt; Stian Knappskog; Benita Kiat Tee Tan; Jos Jonkers; Åke Borg; Naoto T Ueno; Christos Sotiriou; Alain Viari; P Andrew Futreal; Peter J Campbell; Paul N Span; Steven Van Laere; Sunil R Lakhani; Jorunn E Eyfjord; Alastair M Thompson; Ewan Birney; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Marc J van de Vijver; John W M Martens; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Andrea L Richardson; Gu Kong; Gilles Thomas; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.