Literature DB >> 33012803

An Exploratory Assessment of Epistemic Curiosity in Students at Three Doctor of Pharmacy Programs.

Daniel R Malcom1,2, Jeff Cain3, Emily K Frederick1, Chris Johnson4.   

Abstract

Objective. To determine the level of epistemic curiosity in a sample of student pharmacists from three Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) programs as well as any differences in epistemic curiosity levels that exist between programs and with regard to professional year. Methods. Litman's Epistemic Curiosity Scale (ECS) was administered to student pharmacists at three different PharmD programs. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and overall mean ECS scores as well as mean scores on epistemic curiosity motivated by intellectual interest (I-type) and informational deprivation (D-type) were compared among student pharmacists at the three institutions using analysis of variance. Reliability analyses were also performed on the data. Results. A total of 569 out of 1143 eligible students responded to the survey, for an overall response rate of 49.8%. The mean overall ECS score was 27.6 (SD=4.9). Mean I-type epistemic curiosity was 14.9 (SD=2.8) overall, but was statistically different among the schools. Mean D-type epistemic curiosity was 12.7 (SD=3.2) overall, but was statistically similar among the programs. Overall, the data demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of .81. Conclusion. This study was the first to characterize epistemic curiosity in student pharmacists and included data from multiple years and multiple programs. Future analyses should investigate associations between epistemic curiosity and other factors of interest to help elucidate how better understanding epistemic curiosity or enhancing it in student pharmacists may help facilitate student success.
© 2020 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.

Keywords:  curiosity; epistemic curiosity; students

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33012803      PMCID: PMC7523667          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  16 in total

1.  Educational testing and validity of conclusions in the scholarship of teaching and learning.

Authors:  Michael J Peeters; Svetlana A Beltyukova; Beth A Martin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Cecilia M Plaza; Cindy D Stowe; Evan T Robinson; Gary DeLander; Diane E Beck; Russell B Melchert; Robert B Supernaw; Victoria F Roche; Brenda L Gleason; Mark N Strong; Amanda Bain; Gerald E Meyer; Betty J Dong; Jeffrey Rochon; Patty Johnston
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  The wick in the candle of learning: epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory.

Authors:  Min Jeong Kang; Ming Hsu; Ian M Krajbich; George Loewenstein; Samuel M McClure; Joseph Tao-yi Wang; Colin F Camerer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-07-08

4.  We should pay more attention to student curiosity.

Authors:  Jeff Cain
Journal:  Curr Pharm Teach Learn       Date:  2019-03-21

5.  Describing medical student curiosity across a four year curriculum: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Robert Sternszus; Alenoush Saroyan; Yvonne Steinert
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Cultivating 'habits of mind' in the scholarly pharmacy clinician: report of the 2011-12 Argus Commission.

Authors:  Marilyn K Speedie; Jeffrey N Baldwin; Rodney A Carter; Cynthia L Raehl; Victor A Yanchick; Lucinda L Maine
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Curricular Hoarding.

Authors:  Frank Romanelli
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 8.  Curiosity and medical education.

Authors:  Lawrence Dyche; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit.

Authors:  Matthias J Gruber; Bernard D Gelman; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  Measuring social science concepts in pharmacy education research: From definition to item analysis of self-report instruments.

Authors:  M Ken Cor
Journal:  Curr Pharm Teach Learn       Date:  2017-09-30
View more
  1 in total

1.  How Does Hands-On Making Attitude Predict Epistemic Curiosity and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Career Interests? Evidence From an International Exhibition of Young Inventors.

Authors:  Yuting Cui; Jon-Chao Hong; Chi-Ruei Tsai; Jian-Hong Ye
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.