Literature DB >> 21649698

Curiosity and medical education.

Lawrence Dyche1, Ronald M Epstein.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: For doctors, curiosity is fundamental to understanding each patient's unique experience of illness, building respectful relationships with patients, deepening self-awareness, supporting clinical reasoning, avoiding premature closure and encouraging lifelong learning. Yet, curiosity has received limited attention in medical education and research, and studies from the fields of cognitive psychology and education suggest that common practices in medical education may inadvertently suppress curiosity.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify common barriers to and facilitators of curiosity and related habits of mind in the education of doctors.
METHODS: We conducted a theory-driven conceptual exploration and qualitative review of the literature.
RESULTS: Curiosity is related to inquisitiveness, reflection and mindfulness. Instructional practices can suppress curiosity by confusing haste with efficiency, neglecting negative emotions, promoting overconfidence and using teaching approaches that encourage passive learning. Curiosity tends to flourish in educational environments that promote the student's responsibility for his or her own learning, multiple perspectives and mindful reflection on both the subject and the learning process. Specific educational strategies that can support curiosity in classroom and clinical settings include the mindful pacing of teaching, modelling effective management of emotions, confronting uncertainty and overconfidence, using inquiry-based learning, helping students see familiar situations as novel, simultaneously considering multiple perspectives, and maximising the value of small-group discussions. Instructor attributes that contribute to the development of student curiosity include patience, a habit of inquiry, emotional candour, intellectual humility, transparency and recognition of the benefits to be gained in learning from peers.
CONCLUSIONS: Curiosity, inquisitiveness and related habits of mind can be supported in medical education through specific, evidence-based instructional approaches. Medical educators should balance the teaching of facts, techniques and protocols with approaches that help students cultivate and sustain curiosity and wonder in the context-rich, often ambiguous world of clinical medicine. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21649698     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03944.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  11 in total

1.  Curiosity. Are you curious enough to read on?

Authors:  Ami Schattner
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Reflection in medical education: intellectual humility, discovery, and know-how.

Authors:  Edvin Schei; Abraham Fuks; J Donald Boudreau
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2019-06

3.  An Exploratory Assessment of Epistemic Curiosity in Students at Three Doctor of Pharmacy Programs.

Authors:  Daniel R Malcom; Jeff Cain; Emily K Frederick; Chris Johnson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Medical Students' Exposure to the Humanities Correlates with Positive Personal Qualities and Reduced Burnout: A Multi-Institutional U.S. Survey.

Authors:  Salvatore Mangione; Chayan Chakraborti; Giuseppe Staltari; Rebecca Harrison; Allan R Tunkel; Kevin T Liou; Elizabeth Cerceo; Megan Voeller; Wendy L Bedwell; Keaton Fletcher; Marc J Kahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Pain assessment: the roles of physician certainty and curiosity.

Authors:  Cleveland G Shields; Michelle A Finley; Cezanne M Elias; Casey J Coker; Jennifer J Griggs; Kevin Fiscella; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2013-01-28

6.  Challenging students to formulate written questions: a randomized controlled trial to assess learning effects.

Authors:  Marleen Olde Bekkink; A R T Rogier Donders; Jan G Kooloos; Rob Mw de Waal; Dirk J Ruiter
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Remediation of at-risk medical students: theory in action.

Authors:  Kalman A Winston; Cees P M Van Der Vleuten; Albert J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Medical Students' Development of Ethical Judgment - Exploring the Learners' Perspectives using a mixed methods approach.

Authors:  Thorsten Langer; Danny Jazmati; Ole Jung; Christian Schulz; Martin W Schnell
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2016-11-15

Review 9.  A new paradigm for clinical communication: critical review of literature in cancer care.

Authors:  Peter Salmon; Bridget Young
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Medical students' creative projects on a third year pediatrics clerkship: a qualitative analysis of patient-centeredness and emotional connection.

Authors:  Johanna Shapiro; Diane Ortiz; You Ye Ree; Minha Sarwar
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.