| Literature DB >> 33008459 |
Zeeshan Ahmed1,2.
Abstract
Precision medicine aims to empower clinicians to predict the most appropriate course of action for patients with complex diseases like cancer, diabetes, cardiomyopathy, and COVID-19. With a progressive interpretation of the clinical, molecular, and genomic factors at play in diseases, more effective and personalized medical treatments are anticipated for many disorders. Understanding patient's metabolomics and genetic make-up in conjunction with clinical data will significantly lead to determining predisposition, diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers and paths ultimately providing optimal and personalized care for diverse, and targeted chronic and acute diseases. In clinical settings, we need to timely model clinical and multi-omics data to find statistical patterns across millions of features to identify underlying biologic pathways, modifiable risk factors, and actionable information that support early detection and prevention of complex disorders, and development of new therapies for better patient care. It is important to calculate quantitative phenotype measurements, evaluate variants in unique genes and interpret using ACMG guidelines, find frequency of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants without disease indicators, and observe autosomal recessive carriers with a phenotype manifestation in metabolome. Next, ensuring security to reconcile noise, we need to build and train machine-learning prognostic models to meaningfully process multisource heterogeneous data to identify high-risk rare variants and make medically relevant predictions. The goal, today, is to facilitate implementation of mainstream precision medicine to improve the traditional symptom-driven practice of medicine, and allow earlier interventions using predictive diagnostics and tailoring better-personalized treatments. We strongly recommend automated implementation of cutting-edge technologies, utilizing machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) approaches for the multimodal data aggregation, multifactor examination, development of knowledgebase of clinical predictors for decision support, and best strategies for dealing with relevant ethical issues.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Clinics; Genomics; Integrative analysis; Machine learning; Metabolomics; Precision medicine
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33008459 PMCID: PMC7530549 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-020-00287-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Genomics ISSN: 1473-9542 Impact factor: 4.639
Fig. 1Design modeling of heterogenous patient-specific healthcare, genomics, metabolomics, phenotypic, and lifestyle data, and publicly available annotation data including genes, variants, diseases, drugs, and biomarkers. Analysis using AI and ML approaches (Support Vector Machine, Deep Learning, Logistic Regression, Discrimination Analysis, Decision tree, Random Forest, Linear Regression, Naïve Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbor, Hidden Markov Model, and Genetic Algorithm), multifactor examination, knowledgebase and decision support system for data classification, cluster, and regression analysis. Furthermore, resource allocation for data storage and computational analysis
Current potential pitfalls
| Number | Potential pitfalls |
|---|---|
| 1 | Uneven distribution of informatics resources. |
| 2 | Integration of biomedical data located among heterogeneous sources. |
| 3 | Hazards in dehumanization of healthcare data. |
| 4 | Handling of extensively available irrelevant, error prone, and missing data. |
| 5 | Intelligent and user-friendly interface development. |
| 6 | Applying regulations and policies for data collection, usage and sharing. |
| 7 | Harmonizing big data with the definitions of clinical phenotypes and diagnosis. |
| 8 | Inflexible EHR database schemas not geared for precision medicine. |
| 9 | Lack of data availability on social determinants of health. |
| 10 | Unstandardized genomics tools and modifications in their versions and outcome format. |
| 11 | Overloaded Data generated during unnecessary follow-up diagnoses and treatments. |
| 12 | Augmented computational complexity with increasing number of attributes. |
| 13 | Slow SQL based high volume data processing speed. |
| 14 | Determining optimal parameters and understanding structures of AI and ML algorithms. |
| 15 | Handling continuous explanatory variables with more than two levels and understanding odds and probabilities in AI and ML algorithms. |
| 16 | Possibility of too many overfitting attributes in AI and ML algorithms. |
| 17 | Handling redundant attributes, distribution of statistically independent attributes, and management of class frequencies affecting accuracy. |
| 18 | Reduced evidence and reproducibility. |
| 19 | Correct predictor variables selection, and evidence-based observational data analysis and screening. |
| 20 | Gaining confidence of clinicians at AI produced results. |
| 21 | Ethical and social issues related to healthcare data collection, privacy and protection. |