Literature DB >> 33000292

Expanded usage of the Challenge-Comet assay as a DNA repair biomarker in human populations: protocols for fresh and cryopreserved blood samples, and for different challenge agents.

Vanessa Valdiglesias1,2, María Sánchez-Flores3,4, Natalia Fernández-Bertólez3,4, William Au5,6, Eduardo Pásaro3,4, Blanca Laffon3,4.   

Abstract

Deficiencies in DNA damage response and repair (DDRR) can cause serious pathological outcomes; therefore, having an ability to determine individual DDRR would enhance specificities in health risk assessment and in determining individual's response to cancer therapies. However, most methods for evaluating DDRR are not fully appropriate for population studies. The Challenge-Comet assay has gained acceptance for this purpose. The assay has traditionally used X-rays as challenge agent and isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) as cell specimen. To enhance the usefulness of the assay, the objectives of this investigation were to use differently processed blood samples, to employ other challenge agents with different mechanisms of induction of DNA damage/repair, and to generate protocols for detecting different DDRR capacities. Fresh and frozen blood samples were challenged with bleomycin, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and ultraviolet light. Significant induction of damage after all treatments, and progressive and time-dependent DDRR were observed. No significant differences were obtained in the DDRR capacities of fresh or frozen whole blood samples as compared to PBMC, except that fresh blood samples showed higher MMS-induced DDRR capacity than PBMC. Results from this study show that the Challenge-Comet assay can be used as routine biomarker of DDRR capacity in human biomonitoring studies, and that whole blood is also a useful biomatrix for this assay. The collected data allow us to recommend different protocols for the Challenge-Comet assay which are useful for evaluating DDRR capacities in several key DNA repair pathways. Consequently, the usefulness of the Challenge-Comet assay can be greatly expanded.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomonitoring; Cellular repair assay; Challenge-Comet assay; DNA repair; Genotoxicity; Health hazard assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33000292     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02881-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  41 in total

1.  Cryopreserving whole blood for functional assays using viable lymphocytes in molecular epidemiology studies.

Authors:  L Cheng; L E Wang; M R Spitz; Q Wei
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2001-05-26       Impact factor: 8.679

2.  Occupational exposure to mercury vapour on genotoxicity and DNA repair.

Authors:  A Cebulska-Wasilewska; A Panek; Z Zabiński; P Moszczyński; W W Au
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  Challenge assay: A functional biomarker for exposure-induced DNA repair deficiency and for risk of cancer.

Authors:  William W Au; Ashok K Giri; Mathuros Ruchirawat
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 5.840

Review 4.  Nucleotide excision repair and human syndromes.

Authors:  J de Boer; J H Hoeijmakers
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 5.  DNA repair as a human biomonitoring tool: Comet assay approaches.

Authors:  Amaya Azqueta; Sabine A S Langie; Elisa Boutet-Robinet; Susan Duthie; Carina Ladeira; Peter Møller; Andrew R Collins; Roger W L Godschalk
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 5.657

Review 6.  Bleomycins: towards better therapeutics.

Authors:  Jingyang Chen; JoAnne Stubbe
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Can individual repair kinetics of UVC-induced DNA damage in human lymphocytes be assessed through the comet assay?

Authors:  Monica Cipollini; Jiliang He; Paolo Rossi; Flavio Baronti; Alessio Micheli; Anna Maria Rossi; Roberto Barale
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Cryopreserved versus freshly isolated lymphocytes in human biomonitoring: endogenous and induced DNA damage, antioxidant status and repair capability.

Authors:  S J Duthie; L Pirie; A McE Jenkinson; S Narayanan
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.000

9.  Functional characterization of polymorphisms in DNA repair genes using cytogenetic challenge assays.

Authors:  William W Au; Salama A Salama; Carlos H Sierra-Torres
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Comet assay to measure DNA repair: approach and applications.

Authors:  Amaya Azqueta; Jana Slyskova; Sabine A S Langie; Isabel O'Neill Gaivão; Andrew Collins
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of cryopreservation on DNA damage and DNA repair activity in human blood samples in the comet assay.

Authors:  Ezgi Eyluel Bankoglu; Franzisca Stipp; Johanna Gerber; Florian Seyfried; August Heidland; Udo Bahner; Helga Stopper
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Salivary leucocytes as suitable biomatrix for the comet assay in human biomonitoring studies.

Authors:  Blanca Laffon; Vanessa Valdiglesias; Natalia Fernández-Bertólez; Amaya Azqueta; Eduardo Pásaro
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Cell survival after DNA damage in the comet assay.

Authors:  Ezgi Eyluel Bankoglu; Carolin Schuele; Helga Stopper
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 5.153

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.