Literature DB >> 16125447

Occupational exposure to mercury vapour on genotoxicity and DNA repair.

A Cebulska-Wasilewska1, A Panek, Z Zabiński, P Moszczyński, W W Au.   

Abstract

We have conducted a population study to investigate whether current occupational exposure to mercury can cause genotoxicity and can affect DNA repair efficiency. Blood samples from 25 exposed workers and 50 matched controls were investigated for the expression of genotoxicity. The data indicate that mercury exposure did not cause any significant differences between the workers and controls in the baseline levels of DNA strand breaks (as measured by the alkaline version of the single cell gel electrophoresis [SCGE] assay) or sister chromatid exchanges (SCE). However, the exposure produced elevated average DNA tails length in the SCGE assay and frequency of chromosome aberrations. In the studies, isolated lymphocytes were exposed to 6J/m2 UV-C light or 2 Gy dose of X-rays in a challenge assay and repair of the induced DNA damage was evaluated using the SCGE assay. Results from the UV-light challenge assay showed no difference between the workers and controls in the expression of DNA strand breaks after exposure followed by incubation in the absence or presence of the cellular mitogen (phytohemagglutinin, PHA). No difference in DNA strand breaks between the workers and controls was seen immediately after the X-ray challenge, either. However, significant differences were observed in cells that were incubated for 2h with and without phytohemagglutinin. Data from the X-rays challenge assay were further used to calculate indices that indicate DNA repair efficiency. Results show that the repair efficiencies for the workers (69.7% and 83.9% in un-stimulated and stimulated lymphocytes, respectively) were significantly lower than that of matched controls (85.7% and 90.4%, respectively). In addition, the repair efficiency showed a consistent and significant decrease with the duration of occupational exposure to mercury (from 75.7% for <10 years employment, to 65.1% for 11-20 years and to 64.1% for 21-35 years) associated with increase of cytogenetic damage. Our study suggests that the occupational exposure to mercury did not cause a direct genotoxicity but caused significant deficiency in DNA repair. Our observations are consistent with previous studies using the standard chromosome aberration assay to show that exposure to hazardous environmental agents can cause deficiency in DNA repair. Therefore, these affected individuals may have exposure-related increase of health risk from continued exposure and in combination with exposure to other genotoxic agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16125447     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  7 in total

1.  Effects of methyl and inorganic mercury exposure on genome homeostasis and mitochondrial function in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Lauren H Wyatt; Anthony L Luz; Xiou Cao; Laura L Maurer; Ashley M Blawas; Alejandro Aballay; William K Y Pan; Joel N Meyer
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-02-13

2.  Mercury chloride exposure induces DNA damage, reduces fertility, and alters somatic and germline cells in Drosophila melanogaster ovaries.

Authors:  Luis Humberto Mojica-Vázquez; Diana Madrigal-Zarraga; Rocío García-Martínez; Muriel Boube; María Elena Calderón-Segura; Justine Oyallon
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Expanded usage of the Challenge-Comet assay as a DNA repair biomarker in human populations: protocols for fresh and cryopreserved blood samples, and for different challenge agents.

Authors:  Vanessa Valdiglesias; María Sánchez-Flores; Natalia Fernández-Bertólez; William Au; Eduardo Pásaro; Blanca Laffon
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Use of the cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay to detect gender differences and genetic instability in a lung cancer case-control study.

Authors:  Michelle K McHugh; Mirtha S Lopez; Chung-Han Ho; Margaret R Spitz; Carol J Etzel; Randa A El-Zein
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Melatonin: A Versatile Protector against Oxidative DNA Damage.

Authors:  Annia Galano; Dun-Xian Tan; Russel J Reiter
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Towards Therapeutic Alternatives for Mercury Neurotoxicity in the Amazon: Unraveling the Pre-Clinical Effects of the Superfruit Açaí (Euterpe oleracea, Mart.) as Juice for Human Consumption.

Authors:  Maria Elena Crespo-López; Ericks Sousa Soares; Barbarella de Matos Macchi; Leticia Santos-Sacramento; Priscila Yuki Takeda; Amanda Lopes-Araújo; Ricardo Sousa de Oliveira Paraense; José Rogério Souza-Monteiro; Marcus Augusto-Oliveira; Diandra Araújo Luz; Cristiane do Socorro Ferraz Maia; Hervé Rogez; Marcelo de Oliveira Lima; João Paulo Pereira; Diomar Cavalcante Oliveira; Rommel Rodrigues Burbano; Rafael Rodrigues Lima; José Luiz Martins do Nascimento; Gabriela de Paula Arrifano
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  Genotoxicity of Mercury and Its Derivatives Demonstrated In Vitro and In Vivo in Human Populations Studies. Systematic Review.

Authors:  Juana Sánchez-Alarcón; Mirta Milić; Lilia Patricia Bustamante-Montes; Keila Isaac-Olivé; Rafael Valencia-Quintana; Ninfa Ramírez-Durán
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-12-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.