Literature DB >> 11971991

Cryopreserved versus freshly isolated lymphocytes in human biomonitoring: endogenous and induced DNA damage, antioxidant status and repair capability.

S J Duthie1, L Pirie, A McE Jenkinson, S Narayanan.   

Abstract

Lymphocytes are routinely used in human biomonitoring to assess the potential toxic and cytoprotective effects of diet on both DNA damage and repair and, by implication, health. Logistically, samples may require to be cryopreserved and stored. How this affects cells used in human biomonitoring is often not considered. In this study we have evaluated the influence of cryopreservation on endogenous and induced DNA strand breakage, altered bases (oxidized purines, oxidized pyrimidines and misincorporated uracil), antioxidant capacity and DNA repair capability in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Neither isolation nor freezing increased DNA strand breakage above endogenous levels found in freshly isolated human lymphocytes. Oxidized bases (both pyrimidines and purines) and misincorporated uracil, were similar for fresh and frozen lymphocytes. Fresh and frozen lymphocytes responded almost identically to hydrogen peroxide. Quercetin-mediated cytoprotection against hydrogen peroxide-induced strand breakage was maintained in cryopreserved lymphocytes after short-term (24 h) and longer term (2 months) storage compared with freshly isolated and treated cells. Hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA strand breakage was repaired in fresh lymphocytes. Cryopreserved lymphocytes were unable to repair oxidant-induced DNA strand breaks. Frozen human lymphocytes can therefore be successfully used for most aspects of DNA damage biomonitoring, but not for repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11971991     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/17.3.211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  14 in total

1.  Prospective analysis of DNA damage and repair markers of lung cancer risk from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Alice J Sigurdson; Irene M Jones; Qingyi Wei; Xifeng Wu; Margaret R Spitz; Douglas A Stram; Myron D Gross; Wen-Yi Huang; Li-E Wang; Jian Gu; Cynthia B Thomas; Douglas J Reding; Richard B Hayes; Neil E Caporaso
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  No increases in biomarkers of genetic damage or pathological changes in heart and brain tissues in male rats administered methylphenidate hydrochloride (Ritalin) for 28 days.

Authors:  Kristine L Witt; David E Malarkey; Cheryl A Hobbs; Jeffrey P Davis; Grace E Kissling; William Caspary; Gregory Travlos; Leslie Recio
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Cryopreservation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex cells.

Authors:  Zhiquan Shu; Kris M Weigel; Scott D Soelberg; Annie Lakey; Gerard A Cangelosi; Kyong-Hoon Lee; Jae-Hyun Chung; Dayong Gao
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Impact of spinach consumption on DNA stability in peripheral lymphocytes and on biochemical blood parameters: results of a human intervention trial.

Authors:  Beate Moser; Thomas Szekeres; Christian Bieglmayer; Karl-Heinz Wagner; Miroslav Mišík; Michael Kundi; Oliwia Zakerska; Armen Nersesyan; Nina Kager; Johann Zahrl; Christine Hoelzl; Veronika Ehrlich; Siegfried Knasmueller
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.614

5.  A modified alkaline comet assay for measuring DNA repair capacity in human populations.

Authors:  Andrzej R Trzeciak; Janice Barnes; Michele K Evans
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Quantification of DNA repair capacity in whole blood of patients with head and neck cancer and healthy donors by comet assay.

Authors:  Daniel T Saha; Bruce J Davidson; Antai Wang; Allison J Pollock; Roy A Orden; Radoslav Goldman
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Expanded usage of the Challenge-Comet assay as a DNA repair biomarker in human populations: protocols for fresh and cryopreserved blood samples, and for different challenge agents.

Authors:  Vanessa Valdiglesias; María Sánchez-Flores; Natalia Fernández-Bertólez; William Au; Eduardo Pásaro; Blanca Laffon
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  No effect of caloric restriction or exercise on radiation repair capacity.

Authors:  Nina Habermann; Karen W Makar; Clare Abbenhardt; Liren Xiao; Ching-Yun Wang; Heidi K Utsugi; Catherine M Alfano; Kristin L Campbell; Catherine Duggan; Karen E Foster-Schubert; Caitlin E Mason; Ikuyo Imayama; George L Blackburn; John D Potter; Anne McTiernan; Cornelia M Ulrich
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Effect of cryopreservation on DNA damage and DNA repair activity in human blood samples in the comet assay.

Authors:  Ezgi Eyluel Bankoglu; Franzisca Stipp; Johanna Gerber; Florian Seyfried; August Heidland; Udo Bahner; Helga Stopper
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Development of new method and protocol for cryopreservation related to embryo and oocytes freezing in terms of fertilization rate: A comparative study including review of literature.

Authors:  Mayadhar Barik; Minu Bajpai; Santosh Patnaik; Pravash Mishra; Priyamadhaba Behera; Sada Nanda Dwivedi
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2016-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.