Literature DB >> 32997298

Radiation exposure of interventional cardiologists during coronary angiography: evaluation by phantom measurement and computer simulation.

Younghoon Roh1, Sora Nam1, Bong-Ki Lee2, Dong-Ryeol Ryu2, Kwangjin Chun2, Kyu-Sun Lee3, Namho Cho3, Yongsu Yoon4, Hyemin Park1, Byung-Ryul Cho5, Jung Su Kim6.   

Abstract

During interventional cardiological procedures, operators are exposed to patients' scatter radiation. Therefore, we measured the radiation exposure of the operator's eyeball, thyroid, and chest wall during angiography. We used the optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the anthropomorphic phantom and developed Monte Carlo simulations using the Korean human voxel phantom. At 15 frames/s, the radiation dose of the operator's right eyeball (RE), left eyeball (LE), thyroid (T), and chest wall (CW) at the femoral artery puncture position (FAPP) with protective equipment (PE) was 0.015, 0.16, 0.012, and 0.014 mGy, respectively. At 7.5 frames/sec, the radiation dose of the operator's RE, LE, T, and CW at FAPP with PE was 33.33%, 18.75%, 52.94%, and 45.00% lower than that of those at the radial artery puncture position (RAPP), respectively. At 15 frames/s, the radiation dose of the operator's RE, LE, T, and CW at RAPP without PE was 1.76 times, 2.23 times, 2.76 times, and 2.05 times higher than that of those with PE. Per the simulation results, the absorbed radiation dose of the eye ball, thyroid gland, and myocardium of the heart at FAPP with and without PE under 15 frame/s was 9.68%, 13.04%, 8.33% and 9.98%, 6.00%, 8.82% lower than at RAPP under similar conditions. Effective measures for occupational radiological protection are lower frame rate exposure, increased distance from the X-ray source, and PE use. Radiologist protection in interventional cardiology cannot be handled independently of patient protection, owing to several correlations; thus, reducing the patient dose will reduce the operator dose.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary angiography; Interventional cardiologist; Occupational exposure; Radiation exposure; Scatter radiation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32997298     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-020-00931-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 2662-4729


  8 in total

Review 1.  ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context.

Authors:  F A Stewart; A V Akleyev; M Hauer-Jensen; J H Hendry; N J Kleiman; T J Macvittie; B M Aleman; A B Edgar; K Mabuchi; C R Muirhead; R E Shore; W H Wallace
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2012-02

2.  Occupational Health Risks in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Workers.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Andreassi; Emanuela Piccaluga; Giulio Guagliumi; Maurizio Del Greco; Fiorenzo Gaita; Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.546

3.  ICRP Publication 139: Occupational Radiological Protection in Interventional Procedures.

Authors:  P Ortiz López; L T Dauer; R Loose; C J Martin; D L Miller; E Vañó; M Doruff; R Padovani; G Massera; C Yoder
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2018-03

Review 4.  ICRP PUBLICATION 120: Radiological protection in cardiology.

Authors:  C Cousins; D L Miller; G Bernardi; M M Rehani; P Schofield; E Vañó; A J Einstein; B Geiger; P Heintz; R Padovani; K-H Sim
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2013-02

5.  Clinical application of 'Justification' and 'Optimization' principle of ALARA in pediatric CT imaging: "How many children can be protected from unnecessary radiation?".

Authors:  Kushaljit S Sodhi; Satheesh Krishna; Akshay K Saxena; Anindita Sinha; Niranjan Khandelwal; Edward Y Lee
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  ICRP publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology.

Authors:  P-L Khong; H Ringertz; V Donoghue; D Frush; M Rehani; K Appelgate; R Sanchez
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2013-04

Review 7.  Occupational radiation doses to operators performing cardiac catheterization procedures.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller; Stephen Balter; Ruth A Kleinerman; Martha S Linet; Deukwoo Kwon; Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Assessment of pain score and specimen adequacy for ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Li-Jen Liao; Wu-Chia Lo; Wan-Lun Hsu; Po-Wen Cheng; Cheng-Ping Wang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.133

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.