Maria Grazia Andreassi1, Emanuela Piccaluga2, Giulio Guagliumi2, Maurizio Del Greco2, Fiorenzo Gaita2, Eugenio Picano2. 1. From the CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy (M.G.A., E. Picano); Cardiovascular Department, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital Milan, Milano Italy (E. Piccaluga); Cardiovascular Department, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy (G.G.); Department of Cardiology, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy (M.D.G.); and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Torino, Italy (F.G.). mariagrazia.andreassi@ifc.cnr.it. 2. From the CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy (M.G.A., E. Picano); Cardiovascular Department, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital Milan, Milano Italy (E. Piccaluga); Cardiovascular Department, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy (G.G.); Department of Cardiology, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy (M.D.G.); and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Torino, Italy (F.G.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Orthopedic strain and radiation exposure are recognized risk factors in personnel staff performing fluoroscopically guided cardiovascular procedures. However, the potential occupational health effects are still unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of health problems among personnel staff working in interventional cardiology/cardiac electrophysiology and correlate them with the length of occupational radiation exposure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a self-administered questionnaire to collect demographic information, work-related information, lifestyle-confounding factors, all current medications, and health status. A total number of 746 questionnaires were properly filled comprising 466 exposed staff (281 males; 44±9 years) and 280 unexposed subjects (179 males; 43±7years). Exposed personnel included 218 interventional cardiologists and electrophysiologists (168 males; 46±9 years); 191 nurses (76 males; 42±7 years), and 57 technicians (37 males; 40±12 years) working for a median of 10 years (quartiles: 5-24 years). Skin lesions (P=0.002), orthopedic illness (P<0.001), cataract (P=0.003), hypertension (P=0.02), and hypercholesterolemia (P<0.001) were all significantly higher in exposed versus nonexposed group, with a clear gradient unfavorable for physicians over technicians and nurses and for longer history of work (>16 years). In highly exposed physicians, adjusted odds ratio ranged from 1.7 for hypertension (95% confidence interval: 1-3; P=0.05), 2.9 for hypercholesterolemia (95% confidence interval: 1-5; P=0.004), 4.5 for cancer (95% confidence interval: 0.9-25; P=0.06), to 9 for cataract (95% confidence interval: 2-41; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Health problems are more frequently observed in workers performing fluoroscopically guided cardiovascular procedures than in unexposed controls, raising the need to spread the culture of safety in the cath laboratory.
BACKGROUND: Orthopedic strain and radiation exposure are recognized risk factors in personnel staff performing fluoroscopically guided cardiovascular procedures. However, the potential occupational health effects are still unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of health problems among personnel staff working in interventional cardiology/cardiac electrophysiology and correlate them with the length of occupational radiation exposure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a self-administered questionnaire to collect demographic information, work-related information, lifestyle-confounding factors, all current medications, and health status. A total number of 746 questionnaires were properly filled comprising 466 exposed staff (281 males; 44±9 years) and 280 unexposed subjects (179 males; 43±7years). Exposed personnel included 218 interventional cardiologists and electrophysiologists (168 males; 46±9 years); 191 nurses (76 males; 42±7 years), and 57 technicians (37 males; 40±12 years) working for a median of 10 years (quartiles: 5-24 years). Skin lesions (P=0.002), orthopedic illness (P<0.001), cataract (P=0.003), hypertension (P=0.02), and hypercholesterolemia (P<0.001) were all significantly higher in exposed versus nonexposed group, with a clear gradient unfavorable for physicians over technicians and nurses and for longer history of work (>16 years). In highly exposed physicians, adjusted odds ratio ranged from 1.7 for hypertension (95% confidence interval: 1-3; P=0.05), 2.9 for hypercholesterolemia (95% confidence interval: 1-5; P=0.004), 4.5 for cancer (95% confidence interval: 0.9-25; P=0.06), to 9 for cataract (95% confidence interval: 2-41; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Health problems are more frequently observed in workers performing fluoroscopically guided cardiovascular procedures than in unexposed controls, raising the need to spread the culture of safety in the cath laboratory.
Authors: Miriam Schnur; Severin Wannagat; Lena Loehr; Sebastian Lask; Andreas Mügge; Alexander Wutzler Journal: Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol Date: 2018-12
Authors: Raquel Velazquez-Kronen; David Borrego; Ethel S Gilbert; Donald L Miller; Kirsten B Moysich; Jo L Freudenheim; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Mark P Little; Amy E Millen; Stephen Balter; Bruce H Alexander; Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet; Cari M Kitahara Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2019-03-19 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Johanna Müller-Leisse; Henrike Aenne Katrin Hillmann; Christian Veltmann; David Duncker Journal: Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol Date: 2021-05-04
Authors: Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Mohammad A Tavallaei; Mihaela Pop; Elena K Grant; Henry Chubb; Kawal Rhode; Graham A Wright Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Christophe T Arendt; Patricia Tischendorf; Julian L Wichmann; Michael Messerli; Lucas Jörg; Niklas Ehl; Robin F Gohmann; Simon Wildermuth; Thomas J Vogl; Ralf W Bauer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 5.315