| Literature DB >> 32995326 |
Zahra Bosak1, Mina Iravani2, Eskandar Moghimipour3, Mohammad Hosein Haghighizadeh4, Parivash Jelodarian5, Mohammad Reza Khazdair6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of chamomile vaginal gel on dyspareunia and sexual satisfaction in postmenopausal women. The phytoestrogenic properties of Matricaria chamomilla were the reason for selection of this plant.Entities:
Keywords: Chamomile; Dyspareunia; Menopause; Sexual satisfaction
Year: 2020 PMID: 32995326 PMCID: PMC7508318
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Figure 1Flow chart of the study
Personal characteristics of subjects (n=96)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 53±3.4 | 53.8±3.2 | 53.7± 2 | 0.503 | |
| Menopausal age (year) | 48/8±1.5 | 49/3±1/2 | 49/5±1/3 | 0.121 | |
| Menarche age (year) | 14.2±1.1 | 14.3±1.2 | 13.8±1.8 | 0.445 | |
| BMI | 24.5±0.29 | 24.6±0.24 | 24.4±0.42 | 0.194 | |
| Education | Elementary | 24(80%) | 24 (75%) | 21 (77.8%) | 0.958 |
| secondary | 4 (13.3%) | 6 (18.8%) | 5 (18.5%) | ||
| High school | 2 (6.7%) | 2 (6.3%) | 1 (3.7%) | ||
| Academic | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| job | employed | 1 (3.3%) | 2 (6.3%) | 1 (3.7%) | 0.834 |
| housewife | 29 (96.7%) | 30 (93.8%) | 26 (96.3%) | ||
| Retired | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Economic status | Poor | 5 (16.7%) | 6 (18.8%) | 5 (18.5%) | 0.963 |
| Moderate | 21 (70%) | 23 (71.9%) | 20 (74.1%) | ||
| Excellent | 4 (13.3%) | 3 (9.4%) | 2 (7.4%) | ||
| Number of intercourse per week | 0 | 2 (6.7%) | 3 (9.4%) | 3 (11.1%) | 0.993 |
| 1 | 20 (66.7%) | 19 (59.4%) | 16 (59.3%) | ||
| 2 | 4 (13.3%) | 6 (18.8%) | 5 (18.5%) | ||
| 3 | 1 (3.3%) | 2 (6.3%) | 1 (3.7%) | ||
| 4 | 3 (10%) | 2 (6.3%) | 2 (7.4%) |
Data is presented as mean±SD and number (percent). Statistical analyses were done using the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal- wallis test.
Comparison of dyspareunia severity before intervention and at weeks 2, 6, and 12 after the study
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | no | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.870 |
| mild | 5 (16.7%) | 5 (15.6%) | 4 (14.8%) | ||
| moderate | 16 (53.3%) | 17 (53.1%) | 15 (55.6%) | ||
| severe | 9 (30%) | 10 (31.3%) | 8 (29.6%) | ||
| Week 2 | no | 9 (30%) | 11 (34.4%) | 0 | 0.001 |
| mild | 12 (40%) | 15 (46.9%) | 5 (18.5%) | ||
| moderate | 9 (30%) | 6 (18.8%) | 17 (63%) | ||
| severe | 0 | 0 | 5 (18.5%) | ||
| Week 6 | no | 21 (70%) | 25 (78.1%) | 0 | 0.001 |
| mild | 9 (30%) | 7 (21.9%) | 7 (25.9%) | ||
| moderate | 0 | 0 | 15 (55.6%) | ||
| severe | 0 | 0 | 5 (18.5%) | ||
| Week 12 | no | 29 (96.7%) | 31 (96.9%) | 0 | 0.001 |
| mild | 1 (3.3%) | 1 (3.1%) | 8 (29.6%) | ||
| moderate | 0 | 0 | 14 (51.9%) | ||
| severe | 0 | 0 | 5 (18.5%) | ||
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 | ||
Data is presented as number (percent).
P-value*: comparison of the three groups at the beginning of the study and after the intervention (Week 2, 6 and 12), made using kruskal Wallis test.
P-value**: Compared using Friedman test for changes within the groups.
Comparison of mean scores of sexual satisfaction in groups received chamomile vaginal gel, conjugated estrogen vaginal cream, and placebo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | 66.8±16.3 | 16.3±66.5 | 15.7±71.8 | 0.300 |
| After intervention | 88.4±14.9 | 12.9±7.88 | 16.2±76.4 | 0.003 |
Data is presented as mean±SD.
* One-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean of changes between the three groups, before and after the intervention.
Pairwise comparison of groups
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Chamomile | Conjugated estrogen | 1.3 ±-1.6 | 0.467 |
| Placebo | 17±1.4 | 0.001 | |
| Conjugated estrogen | Chamomile | 1.3 ±1.6 | 0.467 |
| Placebo | 18.6±1.4 | 0.001 | |
| Placebo | Chamomile | -17±1.4 | 0.001 |
| Conjugated estrogen | -18.6±1.4 | 0.001 |
Data is presented as mean±SD. * The comparison of groups was made by Tukey’s test post hoc.