| Literature DB >> 32992985 |
Maria Eulina Quilião1, Fabio Antonio Venancio2, Lisany Krug Mareto3, Sahra de Almeida Metzker4, Ana Isabel do Nascimento5, Daniele Cristina Vitorelli-Venancio2, Cláudia Du Bocage Santos-Pinto3, Everton Falcão de Oliveira2,3.
Abstract
Clinical outcomes related to congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) include microcephaly accompanied by specific brain injuries. Among several CZS outcomes that have been described, epilepsy and motor impairments are present in most cases. Pharmacological treatment for seizures resulting from epilepsy is performed with anticonvulsant drugs, which in the long term are related to impairments in the child's neuropsychomotor development. Here, we describe the results from a two-year follow-up of a cohort of children diagnosed with CZS related to the growth of the head circumference and some neurological and motor outcomes, including the pharmacological approach, and its results in the treatment of epileptic seizures. This paper is part of a prospective cohort study carried out in the state of Mato Grosso Sul, Brazil, based on a Zika virus (ZIKV)-exposed child population. Our data were focused on the assessment of head circumference growth and some neurological and motor findings, including the description of seizure conditions and pharmacological management in two periods. Among the 11 children evaluated, 8 had severe microcephaly associated with motor impairment and/or epilepsy. Seven children were diagnosed with epilepsy. Of these, 3 had West syndrome. In four children with other forms of epilepsy, there was no pharmacological control.Entities:
Keywords: West syndrome; Zika virus; congenital Zika syndrome; epilepsy; motor impairment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32992985 PMCID: PMC7601787 DOI: 10.3390/v12101083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Longitudinal monitoring of head circumference of children with congenital Zika syndrome (CZS).
| ID | At Delivery | First Assessment (Oct 2018 to Feb 2019) | Second Assessment (Oct 2019 to Feb 2020) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZS Status | Gestation Length (in Week) | Head Circumference | SD (Z-Score) | Child’s Age | Head Circumference | SD (Z-Score) | Child’s Age | Head Circumference | SD (Z-Score) | |
| 1 | Confirmed | 39 | 29 | −3 (−3.89) | 2y 3m | 42 | −4 (−4.80) | 3y 3m | 43.5 | −4 (−4.32) |
| 2 | Confirmed | 42 | 31 | −3 (−3.40) | 2y 3m | 39 | −4 (−6.98) | 3y 4m | 44 | −4 (−4.00) |
| 3 | Confirmed | 39 | 28 | −4 (−4.29) | 2y 3m | 38 | −4 (−6.84) | 3y 3m | 38 | −4 (−7.60) |
| 4 | Confirmed | 35 | 28 | −3 (−3.16) | 2y 4m | 36.5 | −4 (−8.84) | 3y 3m | 40 | −4 (−6.76) |
| 5 | Confirmed | 36 | 26 | −4 (−4.53) | 2y 4m | 36 | −4 (−8.34) | 3y 4m | 38 | −4 (−7.64) |
| 6 | Potential | 41 | 35.5 | 0 (+0.70) | 2y 4m | 49 | 0 (+0.20) | 3y 7m | 50 | 0 (+0.04) |
| 7 | Potential | 34 | 26 | −4 (−3.79) | 0y 7m | 36 | −4 (−5.19) | 1y 10m | 39 | −4 (−5.67) |
| 8 | Potential | 37 | 32 | −1 (−1.12) | 2y 3m | 42 | −4 (−4.80) | 3y 5m | 43 | −4 (−4.73) |
| 9 | Potential | 39 | 30 | −3 (−3.22) | 2y 3m | 42 | −4 (−4.80) | 3y 6m | 43.5 | −4 (−4.42) |
| 10 | Potential | 35 | 29 | −3 (−2.15) | 0y 9m | 40 | −2 (−2.86) | 1y 5m | 43 | −2 (−2.22) |
| 11 | Potential | 24 | 29 | +4 (+4.10) | 2y 5m | 48 | 0 (+0.13) | 3y 7m | 49 | 0 (−0.02) |
ID: Identification number; SD = Standard deviation; Confirmed case: A live-born child with clinical outcomes and imaging evidence suggestive of CZS, RT-PCR ZIKV-positive, or ZIKV-reagent serology (IgM) tested after birth and with unreacted/negative STORCH results in both the mother and newborn; Potential case: A live-born child with clinical outcomes and imaging evidence suggestive of CZS, with ZIKV-reagent serology (IgG) after birth, and/or live-born from a ZIKV-positive mother (RT-PCR or ZIKV-reagent serology—IgM), who has clinical outcomes and suggestive imaging evidence of CZS.
Electroencephalogram, occurrence of epilepsy, type, treatment, and seizure control of congenital Zika syndrome cases.
| ID | EEG | First Assessment (Oct 2018 to Feb 2019) | Second Assessment (Oct 2019 to Feb 2020) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child’s Age (First Evaluation) | Seizure Frequency | Seizure Type | Treatment | Seizure Control | Child’s Age (Second Evaluation) | Seizure Frequency | Seizure Type | Treatment | Seizure Control | ||
| 1 | Normal | 2y 3m | No seizure | No epileptic | No treatment | No applicable | 3y 3m | No seizure | No epileptic | No treatment | No applicable |
| 2 | Focal | 2y 3m | Weekly seizures | Focal motor | Monotherapy (phenobarbital) | No | 3y 4m | No seizure | Controlled epilepsy | Monotherapy (vigabatrin) | Yes |
| 3 | Hypsarrhythmia | 2y 3m | Daily seizures | Epileptic spasms | Polytherapy (sodium valproate, vigabatrin, and phenobarbital) | No | 3y 3m | Occasionally | Focal motor | Polytherapy (levetiracetam and phenobarbital) | No |
| 4 | Generalized epileptiform discharges | 2y 4m | Single seizure (at 14 months) | Tonic-clonic | Monotherapy (phenobarbital) | Yes | 3y 3m | No seizure | No seizure | No treatment | No applicable |
| 5 | Focal | 2y 4m | Single seizure (at 4 months) | Focal motor | Monotherapy (phenobarbital) | Yes | 3y 4m | No seizure | No seizure | No treatment | No applicable |
| 6 | Normal | 2y 4m | No seizure | No epileptic | No treatment | No applicable | 3y 7m | No seizure | No epileptic | No treatment | No applicable |
| 7 | Hypsarrhythmia | 0y 7m | Daily seizures | Epileptic spasms | Polytherapy (clonazepam, levetiracetam, and vigabatrin) | No | 1y 7m | Daily seizures | Epileptic spasms | Polytherapy (vigabatrin and nitrazepam) | No |
| 8 | Hypsarrhythmia | 2y 3m | Daily seizures | Epileptic spasms | Polytherapy (levetiracetam, vigabatrin, and phenobarbital) | No | 3y 5m | Daily seizures | Epileptic spasms | Polytherapy (levetiracetam, vigabatrin, and clobazam) | No |
| 9 | Multifocal epileptiform discharge | 2y 3m | Weekly seizures up to 6 months old | Focal motor | Monotherapy (oxcarbazepine) | Yes | 3y 6m | Daily seizures starting at 3 years old | Epileptic spasms | Polytherapy (oxcarbazepine and levetiracetam) | No |
| 10 | Focal | 0y 9m | No seizure | No epileptic | No treatment | No applicable | 1y 5m | No seizure | No epileptic | No treatment | No applicable |
| 11 | Normal | 2y 5m | No seizure | No epileptic | No treatment | No applicable | 3y 7m | No seizure | No epileptic | No treatment | No applicable |
ID: Identification number; EEG: Electroencephalogram.
Head circumference and Z-score relative changes and other main study findings.
| ID | HC Relative Change (%) | Z-Score Relative Change (%) * | Microcephaly | EEG | Seizure Occurrence | Seizure Control after the Two Assessments | GMFCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.6 | 10.0 | Yes | Normal | No | No applicable | 5 |
| 2 | 12.8 | 42.7 | Yes | Focal | Yes | Yes | 5 |
| 3 | 0.0 | 11.1 | Yes | Hypsarrhythmia | Yes | No | 5 |
| 4 | 9.6 | 23.5 | Yes | Generalized epileptiform discharges | Yes | Yes | 5 |
| 5 | 5.6 | 8.4 | Focal | Yes | Yes | 5 | |
| 6 | 2.0 | 80.0 | No | Normal | No | No applicable | 3 |
| 7 | 8.3 | 9.2 | Yes | Hypsarrhythmia | Yes | No | 5 |
| 8 | 2.4 | 1.5 | Yes | Hypsarrhythmia | Yes | No | 5 |
| 9 | 3.6 | 7.9 | Yes | Multifocal epileptiform discharge | Yes | No | 5 |
| 10 | 7.5 | 22.4 | No | Focal | No | No applicable | 5 |
| 11 | 2.1 | 115.4 | No | Normal | No | No applicable | 2 |
* The relative difference was expressed in module values. ID: Identification number; EEG: Electroencephalogram; GMFCS: Gross Motor Function Classification System.