| Literature DB >> 31584972 |
Fabio Antonio Venancio1, Maria Eulina Quilião Bernal2, Maria da Conceição de Barros Vieira Ramos3, Neuma Rocha Chaves3, Marcos Vinicius Hendges4, Mattheus Marques Rodrigues de Souza4, Márcio José de Medeiros5, Cláudia Du Bocage Santos Pinto6, Everton Falcão de Oliveira1,6.
Abstract
Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS) is a unique pattern of congenital abnormalities found in fetuses and neonates infected with the Zika virus (ZIKV). Here, we clinically identify and characterize infants with CZS between 2015 and 2018 in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil-a border area with Paraguay and Bolivia. This cross-sectional study, based on primary and secondary data, tracks the cases registered in the Brazilian Public Health Reporting System through the following stages: (1) preliminary data analysis, (2) identification of the congenital syndrome cases, (3) etiologic classification of the cases, (4) active search, and (5) clinical assessment. Of the 72 investigated cases, 16 were probable cases of CZS. Of these, it was only possible to clinically assess 11 infants. Considering the 16 probable cases of CZS, nine were classified as confirmed cases, and five as potential cases of the syndrome. Regarding clinical features, brain palsy was identified in all analyzed infants. Moreover, microcephaly and pseudobulbar syndrome were found in eight infants, and hydrocephalus was found in three individuals. In addition to these conditions, seven children were malnourished. Our study may provide significant insights for other researches that aim to elucidate CZS and its clinical and populational consequences.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31584972 PMCID: PMC6777783 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Algorithm for the screening of cases reported to the RESP(a).
(a)Inclusion of one case not reported to RESP, CA = congenital anomalies, CZS = congenital ZIKV syndrome. Note: Gray boxes indicate excluded cases during screening.
Fig 2Frequency of congenital anomaly cases reported to the RESP, confirmed and potential cases of CZS (A), and ZIKV fever incidence in total population and pregnant women (B). (a) It includes four unassessed cases that were classified as confirmed based on secondary data.
Clinical and laboratory data from mother and children from the RESP by location.
| ID | City | Year of birth (child) | Initial clinical findings | Period of identification of the clinical finding | Confirmation of laboratory infection for ZIKV in the infant (method) | Confirmation of laboratory infection for ZIKV in the mother (method) | Etiology of congenital anomaly reported to the RESP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Campo Grande | 2016 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | Yes (RT-PCR) | Yes (RT-PCR) | ZIKV |
| 2 | Campo Grande | 2016 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | Yes (RT-PCR) | Yes (RT-PCR) | ZIKV |
| 3 | Caracol | 2016 | Microcephaly | Intrauterine | Yes (RT-PCR) | Yes (RT-PCR) | ZIKV |
| 4 | Campo Grande | 2016 | Microcephaly | Intrauterine | Yes (RT-PCR) | Yes (RT-PCR) | ZIKV |
| 5 | Campo Grande | 2016 | Microcephaly | Intrauterine | Yes (RT-PCR) | Yes (RT-PCR) | ZIKV |
| 6 | Campo Grande | 2016 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | Yes (RT-PCR) | Yes (RT-PCR) | ZIKV |
| 7 | Camapuã | 2017 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | Yes (RT-PCR) | Yes (RT-PCR) | ZIKV |
| 8 | Dourados | 2016 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | Yes (RT-PCR) | Yes (RT-PCR) | ZIKV |
| 9 | Campo Grande | 2016 | Microcephaly | Intrauterine | Yes (RT-PCR) | Yes (RT-PCR) | ZIKV |
| 10 | Campo Grande | 2016 | Not registered | ____ | No | Yes (RT-PCR) | ZIKV |
| 11 | Campo Grande | 2018 | Microcephaly | Intrauterine | Yes (Serology anti-ZIKV—IgG) | Yes (Serology anti-ZIKV—IgG) | ZIKV |
| 12 | Campo Grande | 2016 | Brain Calcifications | Intrauterine | No (RT-PCR) | Yes (RT-PCR) | No data available |
| 13 | Rio Verde | 2016 | Microcephaly | Intrauterine | Yes (Serology anti-ZIKV—IgG) | Yes (RT-PCR) | ZIKV |
| 14 | Campo Grande | 2018 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | Yes (Serology anti-ZIKV—IgG) | Yes (Serology anti-ZIKV—IgG) | ZIKV |
| 15 | Caarapó | 2016 | Syndactilism, Polydactylism and Palatine Fissure | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | Yes (RT-PCR) | No data available |
| 16 | Campo Grande | 2016 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | Yes (RT-PCR) | No data available |
| 17 | Bonito | 2016 | Microcephaly | Intrauterine | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | Cytomegalovirus |
| 18 | Campo Grande | 2016 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | Cytomegalovirus |
| 19 | Dourados | 2016 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | |
| 20 | Dourados | 2016 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | Not identified |
| 21 | Fátima do Sul | 2016 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | Cytomegalovirus |
| 22 | Jardim | 2017 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | No data available |
| 23 | Nova alvorada do Sul | 2018 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | Not identified |
| 24 | Nova Andradina | 2016 | Microcephaly | Intrauterine | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | Not identified |
| 25 | Paranaíba | 2016 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | |
| 26 | Paranaíba | 2016 | Brain Calcifications | Intrauterine | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | No data available |
| 27 | Ponta Porã | 2015 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | Cytomegalovirus |
| 28 | Ponta Porã | 2017 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | Cytomegalovirus |
| 29 | Ponta Porã | 2016 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | |
| 30 | Paranaíba | 2015 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | Yes (RT-PCR) | Not identified |
| 31 | Maracaju | 2016 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | Cytomegalovirus |
| 32 | Campo Grande | 2018 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | Genetic mutation |
| 33 | Campo Grande | 2016 | Microcephaly | Postpartum | No (RT-PCR) | No (RT-PCR) | Not identified |
(a) Child not reported to the RESP; ID = identification number; RT-PCR = reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
Clinical characteristics and laboratory data of probable cases of CZS at delivery (before clinical assessment).
| ID | Sex | Pregnancy period (in week) | Laboratory confirmation for infant | Method of laboratory evidence | Maternal infection | Trimester of maternal infection | Previous maternal infection by other arbovirus | Period of malformation identification | HC at delivery | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 39 | Yes | RT-PCR | Yes | Second | Yes | Postpartum | 29 | -3 |
| 2 | M | 42 | Yes | RT-PCR | Yes | First | Yes | Postpartum | 31 | -3 |
| 3 | F | 39 | Yes | RT-PCR | Yes | First | No | Antenatal (32w) | 28 | -4 |
| 4 | M | 35 | Yes | RT-PCR | Yes | First | No | Antenatal (35w) | 28 | -3 |
| 5 | F | 36 | Yes | RT-PCR | Yes | Third | No | Antenatal (33w) | 26 | -4 |
| 6 | M | 34 | Yes | RT-PCR | Yes | Second | No | Postpartum | 31 | 0 |
| 7 | M | 39 | Yes | RT-PCR | Yes | —- | No | Postpartum | 32 | -1 |
| 8 | F | 37 | Yes | RT-PCR | Yes | —- | No | Postpartum | 29 | -2 |
| 9 | M | 39 | Yes | RT-PCR | Yes | First | No | Antenatal (30w) | 31 | -2 |
| 10 | M | 41 | No | RT-PCR | Yes | First | No | Postpartum | 35,5 | 0 |
| 11 | F | 34 | Yes | Serology (anti-ZIKV—IgG) | Yes | Unknown | No | Antenatal (32w) | 26 | -4 |
| 12 | M | 37 | No | RT-PCR | Yes | Second | Yes | Antenatal (36w) | 32 | -1 |
| 13 | M | 39 | Yes | Serology (anti-ZIKV—IgG) | Yes | First | No | Antenatal (13w) | 30 | -3 |
| 14 | F | 35 | Yes | Serology (anti-ZIKV—IgG) | Yes | —- | No | Postpartum | 29 | -2 |
| 15 | F | 37 | No | RT-PCR | Yes | First | No | Postpartum | 32,5 | 0 |
| 16 | M | 32 | No | RT-PCR | Yes | Second | No | Postpartum | 29 | 0 |
(a) Previous historical to dengue; ID = identification number; SD = standard deviation; HC = head circumference; RT-PCR = Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction; —- = no information available
Clinical outcomes of cases assessed in stage 5.
| ID | Child age (at assessment) | Current HC | SD | CP | Most affected brain hemisphere | Microcephaly | Craniofacial disproportion | Redundant Scalp Skin | Hydrocephalus | Epilepsy | Arthrogryposis | Visual and oculomotricity alterations | Auditory Impairment | Nutritional Status | Final classification for CZS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2y 3m 29d | 42 | -4 | Yes | Left | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | Malnutrition | Confirmed |
| 2 | 2y 3m 20d | 39 | -4 | Yes | Not identified | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Malnutrition | Confirmed |
| 3 | 2y 3m 7d | 38 | -4 | Yes | Left | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Malnutrition | Confirmed |
| 4 | 2y 4m 3d | 36,5 | -4 | Yes | Left | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Malnutrition | Confirmed |
| 5 | 2y 4m 14d | 36 | -4 | Yes | Right | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | Malnutrition | Confirmed |
| 10 | 2y 4m 14d | 49 | 0 | Yes | Not identified | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Eutrophy | Potential |
| 11 | 0y 7m 12d | 36 | -4 | Yes | Right | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Obesity | Potential |
| 12 | 2y 3m 22d | 42 | -4 | Yes | Left | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Malnutrition | Potential |
| 13 | 2y 3m 13d | 42 | -4 | Yes | Right | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Malnutrition | Potential |
| 15 | 2y 6m 25d | 45 | -2 | No | Not applicable | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Eutrophy | Discarded |
| 16 | 2y 6m 11d | 49 | 0 | No | Not applicable | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Eutrophy | Discarded |
ID = identification number; HC = head circumference; SD = standard deviation; CP = cerebral palsy.