Literature DB >> 32991717

The Alginate Immobilization of Metabolic Enzymes Platform Retrofits an Estrogen Receptor Transactivation Assay With Metabolic Competence.

Chad Deisenroth1, Danica E DeGroot1, Todd Zurlinden1, Andrew Eicher1, James McCord1, Mi-Young Lee2, Paul Carmichael2, Russell S Thomas1.   

Abstract

The U.S. EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program utilizes data across the ToxCast/Tox21 high-throughput screening (HTS) programs to evaluate the biological effects of potential endocrine active substances. A potential limitation to the use of in vitro assay data in regulatory decision-making is the lack of coverage for xenobiotic metabolic processes. Both hepatic- and peripheral-tissue metabolism can yield metabolites that exhibit greater activity than the parent compound (bioactivation) or are inactive (bioinactivation) for a given biological target. Interpretation of biological effect data for both putative endocrine active substances, as well as other chemicals, screened in HTS assays may benefit from the addition of xenobiotic metabolic capabilities to decrease the uncertainty in predicting potential hazards to human health. The objective of this study was to develop an approach to retrofit existing HTS assays with hepatic metabolism. The Alginate Immobilization of Metabolic Enzymes (AIME) platform encapsulates hepatic S9 fractions in alginate microspheres attached to 96-well peg lids. Functional characterization across a panel of reference substrates for phase I cytochrome P450 enzymes revealed substrate depletion with expected metabolite accumulation. Performance of the AIME method in the VM7Luc estrogen receptor transactivation assay was evaluated across 15 reference chemicals and 48 test chemicals that yield metabolites previously identified as estrogen receptor active or inactive. The results demonstrate the utility of applying the AIME method for identification of false-positive and false-negative target assay effects, reprioritization of hazard based on metabolism-dependent bioactivity, and enhanced in vivo concordance with the rodent uterotrophic bioassay. Integration of the AIME metabolism method may prove useful for future biochemical and cell-based HTS applications. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology 2020. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endocrine toxicology; estrogen receptor; high-throughput screening; xenobiotic metabolism

Year:  2020        PMID: 32991717      PMCID: PMC8154005          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaa147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  73 in total

1.  A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  1999

2.  Direct influence of S9 liver homogenate on fluorescence signals: impact on practical applications in a bacterial genotoxicity assay.

Authors:  Jürg Dreier; Eva B Breitmaier; Elmar Gocke; Christian M Apfel; Malcolm G P Page
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  The conduct of in vitro and in vivo drug-drug interaction studies: a Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) perspective.

Authors:  Thorir D Bjornsson; John T Callaghan; Heidi J Einolf; Volker Fischer; Lawrence Gan; Scott Grimm; John Kao; S Peter King; Gerald Miwa; Lan Ni; Gondi Kumar; James McLeod; R Scott Obach; Stanley Roberts; Amy Roe; Anita Shah; Fred Snikeris; John T Sullivan; Donald Tweedie; Jose M Vega; John Walsh; Steven A Wrighton
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.922

4.  Integrated Model of Chemical Perturbations of a Biological Pathway Using 18 In Vitro High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Estrogen Receptor.

Authors:  Richard S Judson; Felicia Maria Magpantay; Vijay Chickarmane; Cymra Haskell; Nessy Tania; Jean Taylor; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Daniel M Rotroff; Dayne L Filer; Keith A Houck; Matthew T Martin; Nisha Sipes; Ann M Richard; Kamel Mansouri; R Woodrow Setzer; Thomas B Knudsen; Kevin M Crofton; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Evaluation of androgen assay results using a curated Hershberger database.

Authors:  N C Kleinstreuer; P Browne; X Chang; R Judson; W Casey; P Ceger; C Deisenroth; N Baker; K Markey; R S Thomas
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.143

6.  Incorporation of a metabolizing system in biodetection assays for endocrine active substances.

Authors:  Julie Mollergues; Barbara van Vugt-Lussenburg; Christian Kirchnawy; Reka Anna Bandi; Rosan B van der Lee; Maricel Marin-Kuan; Benoit Schilter; Karma C Fussell
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 6.043

7.  A biomarker approach to measuring human dietary exposure to certain phthalate diesters.

Authors:  W A Anderson; L Castle; M J Scotter; R C Massey; C Springall
Journal:  Food Addit Contam       Date:  2001-12

8.  The Liverbeads as a tool for the comet assay.

Authors:  Laurence Vian; Ayda Yusuf; Claire Guyomard; Jean-Paul Cano
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-08-26       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  High-Throughput Screening of Chemical Effects on Steroidogenesis Using H295R Human Adrenocortical Carcinoma Cells.

Authors:  Agnes L Karmaus; Colleen M Toole; Dayne L Filer; Kenneth C Lewis; Matthew T Martin
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  Improving the human hazard characterization of chemicals: a Tox21 update.

Authors:  Raymond R Tice; Christopher P Austin; Robert J Kavlock; John R Bucher
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization.

Authors:  James P McCord; Louis C Groff; Jon R Sobus
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Mapping Mechanistic Pathways of Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity Using Chemical Structure and Bioactivity Measurements.

Authors:  Stephen W Edwards; Mark Nelms; Virginia K Hench; Jessica Ponder; Kristie Sullivan
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-07

3.  A Population-Based Human In Vitro Approach to Quantify Inter-Individual Variability in Responses to Chemical Mixtures.

Authors:  Lucie C Ford; Suji Jang; Zunwei Chen; Yi-Hui Zhou; Paul J Gallins; Fred A Wright; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-08-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.