Literature DB >> 35386928

Quantitative non-targeted analysis: Bridging the gap between contaminant discovery and risk characterization.

James P McCord1, Louis C Groff2,3, Jon R Sobus2.   

Abstract

Chemical risk assessments follow a long-standing paradigm that integrates hazard, dose-response, and exposure information to facilitate quantitative risk characterization. Targeted analytical measurement data directly support risk assessment activities, as well as downstream risk management and compliance monitoring efforts. Yet, targeted methods have struggled to keep pace with the demands for data regarding the vast, and growing, number of known chemicals. Many contemporary monitoring studies therefore utilize non-targeted analysis (NTA) methods to screen for known chemicals with limited risk information. Qualitative NTA data has enabled identification of previously unknown compounds and characterization of data-poor compounds in support of hazard identification and exposure assessment efforts. In spite of this, NTA data have seen limited use in risk-based decision making due to uncertainties surrounding their quantitative interpretation. Significant efforts have been made in recent years to bridge this quantitative gap. Based on these advancements, quantitative NTA data, when coupled with other high-throughput data streams and predictive models, are poised to directly support 21st-century risk-based decisions. This article highlights components of the chemical risk assessment process that are influenced by NTA data, surveys the existing literature for approaches to derive quantitative estimates of chemicals from NTA measurements, and presents a conceptual framework for incorporating NTA data into contemporary risk assessment frameworks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exposure modeling; Non-targeted analysis; Quantitation; Risk characterization

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35386928      PMCID: PMC8979303          DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.107011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  117 in total

1.  Relating electrospray ionization response to nonpolar character of small peptides.

Authors:  N B Cech; C G Enke
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Assessing the Interplay between the Physicochemical Parameters of Ion-Pairing Reagents and the Analyte Sequence on the Electrospray Desorption Process for Oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Babak Basiri; Mandi M Murph; Michael G Bartlett
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 3.  Exposure science and the U.S. EPA National Center for Computational Toxicology.

Authors:  Elaine A Cohen Hubal; Ann M Richard; Imran Shah; Jane Gallagher; Robert Kavlock; Jerry Blancato; Stephen W Edwards
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Effect of mobile phase on electrospray ionization efficiency.

Authors:  Jaanus Liigand; Anneli Kruve; Ivo Leito; Marion Girod; Rodolphe Antoine
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  ToxCast Chemical Landscape: Paving the Road to 21st Century Toxicology.

Authors:  Ann M Richard; Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Christopher M Grulke; Patra Volarath; Inthirany Thillainadarajah; Chihae Yang; James Rathman; Matthew T Martin; John F Wambaugh; Thomas B Knudsen; Jayaram Kancherla; Kamel Mansouri; Grace Patlewicz; Antony J Williams; Stephen B Little; Kevin M Crofton; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.739

6.  Electrospray ionization efficiency scale of organic compounds.

Authors:  Merit Oss; Anneli Kruve; Koit Herodes; Ivo Leito
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Emerging Chlorinated Polyfluorinated Polyether Compounds Impacting the Waters of Southwestern New Jersey Identified by Use of Nontargeted Analysis.

Authors:  James P McCord; Mark J Strynar; John W Washington; Erica L Bergman; Sandra M Goodrow
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2020-12-08

8.  Applications of Machine Learning to In Silico Quantification of Chemicals without Analytical Standards.

Authors:  Dimitri Panagopoulos Abrahamsson; June-Soo Park; Randolph R Singh; Marina Sirota; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  MetaboAnalyst: a web server for metabolomic data analysis and interpretation.

Authors:  Jianguo Xia; Nick Psychogios; Nelson Young; David S Wishart
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Development of quantitative screen for 1550 chemicals with GC-MS.

Authors:  Alan J Bergmann; Gary L Points; Richard P Scott; Glenn Wilson; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.142

View more
  7 in total

1.  Uncertainty estimation strategies for quantitative non-targeted analysis.

Authors:  Louis C Groff; Jarod N Grossman; Anneli Kruve; Jeffrey M Minucci; Charles N Lowe; James P McCord; Dustin F Kapraun; Katherine A Phillips; S Thomas Purucker; Alex Chao; Caroline L Ring; Antony J Williams; Jon R Sobus
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.478

2.  First Novel Workflow for Semiquantification of Emerging Contaminants in Environmental Samples Analyzed by Gas Chromatography-Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization-Quadrupole Time of Flight-Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Reza Aalizadeh; Varvara Nikolopoulou; Nikiforos A Alygizakis; Nikolaos S Thomaidis
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 8.008

3.  A Need for a Paradigm Shift in Healthy Nutrition Research.

Authors:  Alberto Aleta; Furio Brighenti; Olivier Jolliet; Erik Meijaard; Raanan Shamir; Yamir Moreno; Mario Rasetti
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-04-19

4.  Approaches for assessing performance of high-resolution mass spectrometry-based non-targeted analysis methods.

Authors:  Christine M Fisher; Katherine T Peter; Seth R Newton; Andrew J Schaub; Jon R Sobus
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.478

5.  Detailed Investigation of the Contribution of Gas-Phase Air Contaminants to Exposure Risk during Indoor Activities.

Authors:  Anna L Hodshire; Ellison Carter; James M Mattila; Vito Ilacqua; Jordan Zambrana; Jonathan P D Abbatt; Andrew Abeleira; Caleb Arata; Peter F DeCarlo; Allen H Goldstein; Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz; Marina E Vance; Chen Wang; Delphine K Farmer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 6.  Frontiers in quantifying wildlife behavioural responses to chemical pollution.

Authors:  Michael G Bertram; Jake M Martin; Erin S McCallum; Lesley A Alton; Jack A Brand; Bryan W Brooks; Daniel Cerveny; Jerker Fick; Alex T Ford; Gustav Hellström; Marcus Michelangeli; Shinichi Nakagawa; Giovanni Polverino; Minna Saaristo; Andrew Sih; Hung Tan; Charles R Tyler; Bob B M Wong; Tomas Brodin
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-01

7.  Evaluation of Coriolis Micro Air Sampling to Detect Volatile and Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds.

Authors:  Audrey Courtier; Benoit Roig; Stephane Cariou; Axelle Cadiere; Sandrine Bayle
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.927

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.