Josephine C Jacobs1,2, Jeffrey G Jarvik3, Roger Chou4,5, Derek Boothroyd6, Jeanie Lo7, Andrea Nevedal8, Paul G Barnett7,8. 1. Health Economics Resource Center (HERC), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. josephine.jacobs@va.gov. 2. Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. josephine.jacobs@va.gov. 3. Departments of Radiology, Neurological Surgery and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 4. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Informatics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 6. Quantitative Research Unit, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA, USA. 7. Health Economics Resource Center (HERC), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA. 8. Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contrary to guidelines, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often ordered in the first 6 weeks of new episodes of uncomplicated non-specific low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the downstream consequences of early imaging. DESIGN: Retrospective matched cohort study using data from electronic health records of primary care clinics of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. PARTICIPANTS: Patients seeking primary care for non-specific low back pain without a red flag condition or an encounter for low back pain in the prior 6 months (N = 405,965). EXPOSURE: MRI of the lumbar spine within 6 weeks of the initial primary care visit. MAIN MEASURES: Covariates included patient demographics, health history in the prior year, and baseline pain. Outcomes were lumbar surgery, prescription opioid use, acute health care costs, and last pain score recorded within 1 year of the index visit. KEY RESULTS: Early MRI was associated with more back surgery (1.48% vs. 0.12% in episodes without early MRI), greater use of prescription opioids (35.1% vs. 28.6%), a higher final pain score (3.99 vs. 3.87), and greater acute care costs ($8082 vs. $5560), p < 0.001 for all comparisons. LIMITATIONS: Reliance on data gathered in normal clinical care and the potential for residual confounding despite the use of coarsened exact matching weights to adjust for baseline differences. CONCLUSIONS: The association between early imaging and increased utilization was apparent even in a setting largely unaffected by incentives of fee-for-service care. Reduced imaging cost is only part of the motivation to improve adherence with guidelines for the use of MRI. Early scans are associated with excess surgery, higher costs for other care, and worse outcomes, including potential harms from prescription opioids.
BACKGROUND: Contrary to guidelines, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often ordered in the first 6 weeks of new episodes of uncomplicated non-specific low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the downstream consequences of early imaging. DESIGN: Retrospective matched cohort study using data from electronic health records of primary care clinics of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. PARTICIPANTS: Patients seeking primary care for non-specific low back pain without a red flag condition or an encounter for low back pain in the prior 6 months (N = 405,965). EXPOSURE: MRI of the lumbar spine within 6 weeks of the initial primary care visit. MAIN MEASURES: Covariates included patient demographics, health history in the prior year, and baseline pain. Outcomes were lumbar surgery, prescription opioid use, acute health care costs, and last pain score recorded within 1 year of the index visit. KEY RESULTS: Early MRI was associated with more back surgery (1.48% vs. 0.12% in episodes without early MRI), greater use of prescription opioids (35.1% vs. 28.6%), a higher final pain score (3.99 vs. 3.87), and greater acute care costs ($8082 vs. $5560), p < 0.001 for all comparisons. LIMITATIONS: Reliance on data gathered in normal clinical care and the potential for residual confounding despite the use of coarsened exact matching weights to adjust for baseline differences. CONCLUSIONS: The association between early imaging and increased utilization was apparent even in a setting largely unaffected by incentives of fee-for-service care. Reduced imaging cost is only part of the motivation to improve adherence with guidelines for the use of MRI. Early scans are associated with excess surgery, higher costs for other care, and worse outcomes, including potential harms from prescription opioids.
Entities:
Keywords:
downstream consequences; inappropriate magnetic resonance imaging; low back pain; primary care providers; retrospective matched cohort study
Authors: Robert J Trager; Brian R Anderson; Regina M Casselberry; Jaime A Perez; Jeffery A Dusek Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Rikke K Jensen; Berit Schiøttz-Christensen; Christian Volmar Skovsgaard; Mathias Thorvaldsen; Rune Mygind Mieritz; Andreas K Andresen; Henrik Wulff Christensen; Jan Hartvigsen Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 3.925
Authors: Joel M Stevans; Anthony Delitto; Samannaaz S Khoja; Charity G Patterson; Clair N Smith; Michael J Schneider; Janet K Freburger; Carol M Greco; Jennifer A Freel; Gwendolyn A Sowa; Ajay D Wasan; Gerard P Brennan; Stephen J Hunter; Kate I Minick; Stephen T Wegener; Patti L Ephraim; Michael Friedman; Jason M Beneciuk; Steven Z George; Robert B Saper Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-02-01
Authors: Hazel J Jenkins; Alice Kongsted; Simon D French; Tue Secher Jensen; Klaus Doktor; Jan Hartvigsen; Mark Hancock Journal: Chiropr Man Therap Date: 2021-11-23