Literature DB >> 32989605

Mendelian randomization study indicates lack of causal relationship between physical activity and lung cancer.

Wei Xian1,2,3,4, Jiayi Shen4, Huaqiang Zhou1,2,3, Jiaqing Liu1,2,3, Yaxiong Zhang1,2,3, Zhonghan Zhang1,2,3, Ting Zhou1,2,3, Shaodong Hong1,2,3, Yunpeng Yang1,2,3, Wenfeng Fang1,2,3, Hongyun Zhao1,2,3, Yan Huang1,2,3, Li Zhang5,6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous researches have indicated physical activity (PA) may be associated with lower risk of lung cancer. However, causal relationship between PA and risk of lung cancer is not clear. We aimed to inspect the causal effect of PA on lung cancer.
METHODS: We analyzed summary data of accelerator-measured PA and lung cancer from the genome-wide association study (GWAS) using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) method. We obtained summary data of accelerator-measured PA from UK Biobank, data of lung cancer patients from Consortium and International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO) to investigate possible causal effect of PA on lung cancer.
RESULTS: According to result of MR using inverse variance weighted method (IVW), we found that genetically predicted higher PA level did not causally decrease risk of lung cancer (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88-1.03, p = 0.238). Results of MR-Egger and weighted median method were consistent with IVW method.
CONCLUSION: Our mendelian randomization study showed that genetically higher PA is not causally associated with risk of lung cancer. More researches are needed to investigate relationship between PA and lung cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Causal relationship; Lung cancer; Mendelian randomization; Physical activity; Prevention

Year:  2020        PMID: 32989605     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03409-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  23 in total

Review 1.  Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting.

Authors:  Anna G C Boef; Olaf M Dekkers; Saskia le Cessie
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies.

Authors:  Marie-Jo A Brion; Konstantin Shakhbazov; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 3.  Increasing physical activity and exercise in lung cancer: reviewing safety, benefits, and application.

Authors:  Brett C Bade; D David Thomas; JoAnn B Scott; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 4.  Early Life Exposures and Adult Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Megan A Clarke; Corinne E Joshu
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 5.  Leisure-time physical activity and lung cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Darren R Brenner; Demetra H Yannitsos; Megan S Farris; Mattias Johansson; Christine M Friedenreich
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.705

6.  Impact of physical activity on fatigue and quality of life in people with advanced lung cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H M Dhillon; M L Bell; H P van der Ploeg; J D Turner; M Kabourakis; L Spencer; C Lewis; R Hui; P Blinman; S J Clarke; M J Boyer; J L Vardy
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Large Scale Population Assessment of Physical Activity Using Wrist Worn Accelerometers: The UK Biobank Study.

Authors:  Aiden Doherty; Dan Jackson; Nils Hammerla; Thomas Plötz; Patrick Olivier; Malcolm H Granat; Tom White; Vincent T van Hees; Michael I Trenell; Christoper G Owen; Stephen J Preece; Rob Gillions; Simon Sheard; Tim Peakman; Soren Brage; Nicholas J Wareham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome.

Authors:  Gibran Hemani; Jie Zheng; Benjamin Elsworth; Tom R Gaunt; Philip C Haycock; Kaitlin H Wade; Valeriia Haberland; Denis Baird; Charles Laurin; Stephen Burgess; Jack Bowden; Ryan Langdon; Vanessa Y Tan; James Yarmolinsky; Hashem A Shihab; Nicholas J Timpson; David M Evans; Caroline Relton; Richard M Martin; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 9.  Physical Activity and Exercise in Lung Cancer Care: Will Promises Be Fulfilled?

Authors:  Massimo Lanza; Sara Pilotto; Alice Avancini; Giulia Sartori; Anastasios Gkountakos; Miriam Casali; Ilaria Trestini; Daniela Tregnago; Emilio Bria; Lee W Jones; Michele Milella
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-26

10.  Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 12.434

View more
  3 in total

1.  Univariable and Multivariable Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Investigating the Effects of Leisure Sedentary Behaviors on the Risk of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Haoxin Peng; Xiangrong Wu; Yaokai Wen; Yiyuan Ao; Yutian Li; Wenhui Guan; Jinsheng Lin; Caichen Li; Hengrui Liang; Jianxing He; Wenhua Liang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study supports the causal effects of a high basal metabolic rate on colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  E Wu; Juntao Ni; Lin Tao; Tian Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on risk of cancer.

Authors:  Georgios Markozannes; Afroditi Kanellopoulou; Olympia Dimopoulou; Dimitrios Kosmidis; Xiaomeng Zhang; Lijuan Wang; Evropi Theodoratou; Dipender Gill; Stephen Burgess; Konstantinos K Tsilidis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 11.150

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.