Literature DB >> 32989162

Different mechanisms underlie implicit visual statistical learning in honey bees and humans.

Aurore Avarguès-Weber1, Valerie Finke2, Márton Nagy3,4, Tūnde Szabó3,4,5,6, Daniele d'Amaro7, Adrian G Dyer8,9, József Fiser10,4.   

Abstract

The ability of developing complex internal representations of the environment is considered a crucial antecedent to the emergence of humans' higher cognitive functions. Yet it is an open question whether there is any fundamental difference in how humans and other good visual learner species naturally encode aspects of novel visual scenes. Using the same modified visual statistical learning paradigm and multielement stimuli, we investigated how human adults and honey bees (Apis mellifera) encode spontaneously, without dedicated training, various statistical properties of novel visual scenes. We found that, similarly to humans, honey bees automatically develop a complex internal representation of their visual environment that evolves with accumulation of new evidence even without a targeted reinforcement. In particular, with more experience, they shift from being sensitive to statistics of only elemental features of the scenes to relying on co-occurrence frequencies of elements while losing their sensitivity to elemental frequencies, but they never encode automatically the predictivity of elements. In contrast, humans involuntarily develop an internal representation that includes single-element and co-occurrence statistics, as well as information about the predictivity between elements. Importantly, capturing human visual learning results requires a probabilistic chunk-learning model, whereas a simple fragment-based memory-trace model that counts occurrence summary statistics is sufficient to replicate honey bees' learning behavior. Thus, humans' sophisticated encoding of sensory stimuli that provides intrinsic sensitivity to predictive information might be one of the fundamental prerequisites of developing higher cognitive abilities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apis mellifera; human visual cognition; insect cognition; internal representation; unsupervised learning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32989162      PMCID: PMC7568273          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1919387117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  70 in total

Review 1.  Searching for the memory trace in a mini-brain, the honeybee.

Authors:  R Menzel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 2.  Are bigger brains better?

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Jeremy Niven
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Surpassing the subitizing threshold: appetitive-aversive conditioning improves discrimination of numerosities in honeybees.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard; Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Jair E Garcia; Andrew D Greentree; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Statistical computations over a speech stream in a rodent.

Authors:  Juan M Toro; Josep B Trobalón
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-07

Review 5.  Visual cognition in social insects.

Authors:  Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Nina Deisig; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 6.  Categorization of visual stimuli in the honeybee Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Julie Benard; Silke Stach; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Animal cognition: concepts from apes to bees.

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Keith Jensen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Modularity, comparative cognition and human uniqueness.

Authors:  Sara J Shettleworth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Honey bees as a model for vision, perception, and cognition.

Authors:  Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 19.686

10.  Numerical cognition in honeybees enables addition and subtraction.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard; Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Jair E Garcia; Andrew D Greentree; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  6 in total

1.  Neural processes underlying statistical learning for speech segmentation in dogs.

Authors:  Marianna Boros; Lilla Magyari; Dávid Török; Anett Bozsik; Andrea Deme; Attila Andics
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Changing How Biologists View Flowers-Color as a Perception Not a Trait.

Authors:  Jair E Garcia; Ryan D Phillips; Craig I Peter; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Letter chunk frequency does not explain morphological masked priming : Affix frequency in masked priming.

Authors:  Mara De Rosa; Davide Crepaldi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-11-05

4.  Spontaneous relational and object similarity in wild bumblebees.

Authors:  Gema Martin-Ordas
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.812

Review 5.  Einstein, von Frisch and the honeybee: a historical letter comes to light.

Authors:  Adrian G Dyer; Andrew D Greentree; Jair E Garcia; Elinya L Dyer; Scarlett R Howard; Friedrich G Barth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Approach Direction Prior to Landing Explains Patterns of Colour Learning in Bees.

Authors:  Keri V Langridge; Claudia Wilke; Olena Riabinina; Misha Vorobyev; Natalie Hempel de Ibarra
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.