Literature DB >> 16909238

Categorization of visual stimuli in the honeybee Apis mellifera.

Julie Benard1, Silke Stach, Martin Giurfa.   

Abstract

Categorization refers to the classification of perceptual input into defined functional groups. We present and discuss evidence suggesting that stimulus categorization can also be found in an invertebrate, the honeybee Apis mellifera, thus underlining the generality across species of this cognitive process. Honeybees show positive transfer of appropriate responding from a trained to a novel set of visual stimuli. Such a transfer was demonstrated for specific isolated features such as symmetry or orientation, but also for assemblies (layouts) of features. Although transfer from training to novel stimuli can be achieved by stimulus generalization of the training stimuli, most of these transfer tests involved clearly distinguishable stimuli for which generalization would be reduced. Though in most cases specific experimental controls such as stimulus balance and discriminability are still required, it seems appropriate to characterize the performance of honeybees as reflecting categorization. Further experiments should address the issue of which categorization theory accounts better for the visual performances of honeybees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16909238     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-006-0032-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  31 in total

Review 1.  Honeybees foraging for numbers.

Authors:  Martin Giurfa
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  The effect of flower-like and non-flower-like visual properties on choice of unrewarding patterns by bumblebees.

Authors:  Levente L Orbán; Catherine M S Plowright
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-06-15

3.  Brain modularity in arthropods: individual neurons that support "what" but not "where" memories.

Authors:  Julieta Sztarker; Daniel Tomsic
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Variation in multicomponent recognition cues alters egg rejection decisions: a test of the optimal acceptance threshold hypothesis.

Authors:  Daniel Hanley; Analía V López; Vanina D Fiorini; Juan C Reboreda; Tomáš Grim; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Low-Beta Oscillations Turn Up the Gain During Category Judgments.

Authors:  David A Stanley; Jefferson E Roy; Mikio C Aoi; Nancy J Kopell; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Signal detection and optimal acceptance thresholds in avian brood parasite-host systems: implications for egg rejection.

Authors:  Francisco Ruiz-Raya; Manuel Soler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Aversive reinforcement improves visual discrimination learning in free-flying honeybees.

Authors:  Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Maria G de Brito Sanchez; Martin Giurfa; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Honeybees can discriminate between Monet and Picasso paintings.

Authors:  Wen Wu; Antonio M Moreno; Jason M Tangen; Judith Reinhard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Honey bees selectively avoid difficult choices.

Authors:  Clint J Perry; Andrew B Barron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Different mechanisms underlie implicit visual statistical learning in honey bees and humans.

Authors:  Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Valerie Finke; Márton Nagy; Tūnde Szabó; Daniele d'Amaro; Adrian G Dyer; József Fiser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.