Literature DB >> 31601685

Surpassing the subitizing threshold: appetitive-aversive conditioning improves discrimination of numerosities in honeybees.

Scarlett R Howard1,2, Aurore Avarguès-Weber3, Jair E Garcia2, Andrew D Greentree4, Adrian G Dyer2,5.   

Abstract

Animals including humans, fish and honeybees have demonstrated a quantity discrimination threshold at four objects, often known as subitizing elements. Discrimination between numerosities at or above the subitizing range is considered a complex capacity. In the current study, we trained and tested two groups of bees on their ability to differentiate between quantities (4 versus 5 through to 4 versus 8) when trained with different conditioning procedures. Bees trained with appetitive (reward) differential conditioning demonstrated no significant learning of this task, and limited discrimination above the subitizing range. In contrast, bees trained using appetitive-aversive (reward-aversion) differential conditioning demonstrated significant learning and subsequent discrimination of all tested comparisons from 4 versus 5 to 4 versus 8. Our results show conditioning procedure is vital to performance on numerically challenging tasks, and may inform future research on numerical abilities in other animals.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Approximate number system; Learning; Number; Numeric; Object file system; Quantity discrimination

Year:  2019        PMID: 31601685     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  7 in total

1.  Wild non-eusocial bees learn a colour discrimination task in response to simulated predation events.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2021-06-21

2.  Different mechanisms underlie implicit visual statistical learning in honey bees and humans.

Authors:  Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Valerie Finke; Márton Nagy; Tūnde Szabó; Daniele d'Amaro; Adrian G Dyer; József Fiser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Non-numerical strategies used by bees to solve numerical cognition tasks.

Authors:  HaDi MaBouDi; Andrew B Barron; Sun Li; Maria Honkanen; Olli J Loukola; Fei Peng; Wenfeng Li; James A R Marshall; Alex Cope; Eleni Vasilaki; Cwyn Solvi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Estimating on the fly: The approximate number system in rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus).

Authors:  Mia Corliss; Theo Brown; T Andrew Hurly; Susan D Healy; Maria C Tello-Ramos
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Zebrafish excel in number discrimination under an operant conditioning paradigm.

Authors:  Angelo Bisazza; Maria Santacà
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.899

6.  Comparative psychophysics of colour preferences in two species of non-eusocial Australian native halictid bees.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard; Jair E Garcia; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  The evolution of quantitative sensitivity.

Authors:  Margaret A H Bryer; Sarah E Koopman; Jessica F Cantlon; Steven T Piantadosi; Evan L MacLean; Joseph M Baker; Michael J Beran; Sarah M Jones; Kerry E Jordan; Salif Mahamane; Andreas Nieder; Bonnie M Perdue; Friederike Range; Jeffrey R Stevens; Masaki Tomonaga; Dorottya J Ujfalussy; Jennifer Vonk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.671

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.