Literature DB >> 32988390

Persistent hypermetabolism and longitudinal energy expenditure in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

John Whittle1, Jeroen Molinger1, David MacLeod1, Krista Haines2, Paul E Wischmeyer3,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICU; Indirect Calorimetry; Metabolic cart; Metabolism; Nutrition; SARS-CoV-2; VCO2; VO2

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32988390      PMCID: PMC7521195          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03286-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
COVID-19 infection results in respiratory failure requiring ICU care in a small, yet significant, number of patients [1]. The longitudinal metabolic phenotype and energy expenditure of this novel pandemic disease has yet to be described. As a marked and often prolonged, systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) has been suggested to be a hallmark of severe COVID-19 infection [1], we hypothesized a prolonged hypermetabolic state would evolve over ICU stay that would persist beyond the 7–10 day hypermetabolic phase described previously in other ICU conditions [2]. Further, understanding the energy expenditure of COVID-19 ICU patients is essential to help determine safe, optimal nutrition needs for the ICU provider [3], as both over-/underfeeding is associated with increased ICU mortality [3, 4]. Prediction of resting energy expenditure (pREE) using standardized formulas or bodyweight calculations often correlates poorly with measured REE (mREE) [3]. Thus, our aim was to assess longitudinal mREE via indirect calorimetry (IC) in intubated COVID-19 patients. Here, we report the first results from the LEEP-COVID study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04350073) from March to May, 2020. Following IRB approval, IC was conducted every 72 h (Q-NRG, COSMED/BAXTER, USA) [5]. Prior to testing, patients were confirmed to be in stable condition with only steady-state measures for ≥ 20 min considered valid. mREE was compared to pREE, which was calculated at same timepoints via commonly utilized Harris-Benedict equation (HBE). For calculations, actual body weight (ABW) was used for non-obese (BMI < 30) and both actual and adjusted body weight (AdjBW) was utilized for obese subjects (BMI > 30) [3]. Data from 22 COVID-19 ICU patients are summarized in Table 1 and Fig. 1. During the 1st ICU week, mREE was observed to fall between 15 and 20 kcal/kg (for ABW in BMI < 30 and AdjBW in obese subjects [3].). Increasing hypermetabolism and wider variability in mREE were observed post-1st ICU week. Unlike data from smaller studies in other ICU populations [1], observed hypermetabolism persisted, and in fact increased during 3rd ICU week (mean mREE = 150% pREE in 3rd ICU week). Certain individuals exhibited metabolic rates greater than two-times predicted via HBE, which significantly underpredicted REE post-1st ICU week. Changes in mREE may not be significantly related to severity of organ failure and only minorly affected by paralysis/prone positioning, as these were not significantly different over the study period (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics, clinical care and outcomes, and indirect calorimetry measured resting energy expenditure in COVID-19 ICU patients

(a) Baseline characteristics (n = 22)
 Age (mean, range)58 (31–88)
 Male sex (n, %)13 (59)
 Race (n, %)
  African-American/Black12 (54)
  Caucasian/White7 (32)
  Hispanic3 (14)
 BMI (mean, range)30.7 (17.4–48.1)
 BMI > 30 (%)55
 Ventilator days (21-day study period only) (mean, sd)14.4 (4.7)
 Mortality (21-day study period only) (n, %)3 (14)
 Mortality (hospital mortality) (n, %)5 (22)
(b) Energy expenditure/dataD0–7D7–14D14–21p value
 Measured REE in absolute kCal/day (all patients) (median, IQR)1568 (1175–2215)1830 (1465–2467)2789 (1776–3262)< 0.05
 Measured REE kCal/kg actual BW (non-obese, BMI < 30) (median, IQR)19.2 (16.9–20.7)26 (24.5–35.5)29 (23–34.5)< 0.05
 Measured REE kCal/kg actual BW (obese, BMI > 30) (median, IQR)17.5 (12–19.25)21 (20–23.5)31.5 (24.8–36)< 0.05
 Measured REE kCal/kg adjusted BW (obese, BMI > 30) (median, IQR)20 (17–22.5)26.3 (24–29)32.5 (28.8–35.8)< 0.05
 Measured REE kCal/kg actual BW (all patients) (median, IQR)19 (13.7–28.5)26 (22–42)30.4 (27–35.8)< 0.05
(c) Clinical dataD0–7D7–14D14–21p value
Use of prone positioning (%) (mean, sd)12.3 (8.6)7 (2.4)12.2 (4.3)0.17
Use of paralysis with neuromuscular blocker (%) (mean, sd)14.8 (8)9.7 (1.7)12.3 (3.4)0.2
SOFA score (mean, sd)9 (3.6)9 (3.2)9.5 (3.6)0.5

a, patient characteristics; b, nutritional data for the first 3 weeks post-intubation; c, clinical care and outcomes data

BW body weight; BMI body mass index; REE resting energy expenditure, predicted REE via Harris-Benedict equation; AdjBW adjusted bodyweight, ABW actual body weight, obesity BMI > 30, non-obese BMI < 30I, IQR interquartile range, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, sd standard deviation

Notes: All obese subjects had BMI measures between 30 and 50. p values are for Kruskal-Wallis test

Subjects were withdrawn from this analysis upon extubation or death

Fig. 1

Longitudinal energy expenditure, VO2/VCO2, and clinical care and SOFA score in intubated COVID-19 ICU patients over first 3 ICU weeks post-intubation. a Resting absolute energy expenditure over time in intubated patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. b Resting VO2, VCO2, and RER over time in intubated patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. c Resting energy expenditure over time in intubated non-obese patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. d Resting energy expenditure over time in intubated non-obese and obese patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. e Resting energy expenditure over time in intubated obese patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. f Percentage (%) of intubated patients with SARS-CoV-2 who were in prone position or paralyzed with neuromuscular blockers throughout study. Total number of subjects at any time point still participating in the study is presented in blue. g SOFA scores over time in intubated patients with SARS-CoV-2. Notes: (i) Longitudinal data presented as fitted regression curves (locally weighted scatter plot smoothing, with a 10-point smoothing window) with 72 h measured REE values presented as mean (sd), p values are for MANOVA comparing both differences over time (longitudinal) and at individual time points. (ii) Metabolic cart measurements were able to be conducted on patients with an FiO2 < 70% per manufacturer specifications and as described in new generation metabolic cart (QNRG) validation study reference [5]. (iii) Abbreviations: VO2, volume of oxygen consumed per minute; VCO2, volume of carbon dioxide consumed per minute; obesity, BMI > 30–50, non-obese, BMI < 30; REE, resting energy expenditure; kCal, kilocalories; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; ASPEN, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Baseline characteristics, clinical care and outcomes, and indirect calorimetry measured resting energy expenditure in COVID-19 ICU patients a, patient characteristics; b, nutritional data for the first 3 weeks post-intubation; c, clinical care and outcomes data BW body weight; BMI body mass index; REE resting energy expenditure, predicted REE via Harris-Benedict equation; AdjBW adjusted bodyweight, ABW actual body weight, obesity BMI > 30, non-obese BMI < 30I, IQR interquartile range, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, sd standard deviation Notes: All obese subjects had BMI measures between 30 and 50. p values are for Kruskal-Wallis test Subjects were withdrawn from this analysis upon extubation or death Longitudinal energy expenditure, VO2/VCO2, and clinical care and SOFA score in intubated COVID-19 ICU patients over first 3 ICU weeks post-intubation. a Resting absolute energy expenditure over time in intubated patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. b Resting VO2, VCO2, and RER over time in intubated patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. c Resting energy expenditure over time in intubated non-obese patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. d Resting energy expenditure over time in intubated non-obese and obese patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. e Resting energy expenditure over time in intubated obese patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. f Percentage (%) of intubated patients with SARS-CoV-2 who were in prone position or paralyzed with neuromuscular blockers throughout study. Total number of subjects at any time point still participating in the study is presented in blue. g SOFA scores over time in intubated patients with SARS-CoV-2. Notes: (i) Longitudinal data presented as fitted regression curves (locally weighted scatter plot smoothing, with a 10-point smoothing window) with 72 h measured REE values presented as mean (sd), p values are for MANOVA comparing both differences over time (longitudinal) and at individual time points. (ii) Metabolic cart measurements were able to be conducted on patients with an FiO2 < 70% per manufacturer specifications and as described in new generation metabolic cart (QNRG) validation study reference [5]. (iii) Abbreviations: VO2, volume of oxygen consumed per minute; VCO2, volume of carbon dioxide consumed per minute; obesity, BMI > 30–50, non-obese, BMI < 30; REE, resting energy expenditure; kCal, kilocalories; RER, respiratory exchange ratio; ASPEN, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Longitudinal IC data presented here demonstrate a progressive hypermetabolic phenotype beginning 1 week post-intubation in COVID-19 ICU patients, with significantly greater mREE versus predictive equations or ASPEN-recommended 11–14 kcal/kg ABW for obese subjects used currently to determine energy requirements. Our data support use of standard predictive equations or ~ 20 kcal/kg as a reasonable approximation of mREE in 1st ICU week in COVID-19 patients. Current ESPEN/ASPEN ICU guidelines suggest hypocaloric (~ 70% pREE) feeding during acute phase to prevent overfeeding risk as it is believed ICU patients have initial early endogenous nutrient production that we currently are unable to measure [3, 4]. To our knowledge, this is the first description of longitudinal mREE in a COVID-19 ICU population. The COVID-19 metabolic phenotype may be unique from previously described ICU models of metabolic response [2], with a more prolonged hypermetabolic phase that may be independent of severity of organ failure and, as previously published, may only be minorly affected by interventions such as paralysis [6]. Further, it is one of the largest single-ICU diagnosis cohorts with longitudinal IC measures for 21 days. In conclusion, we demonstrate progressive hypermetabolism and considerable variation in REE throughout ICU stay. We hope this data assists ICU clinicians in further understanding the effects of COVID-19 on metabolism and in assessing nutrition care needs. These data suggest personalization of nutrition delivery, including IC use [3, 5], should be considered to provide more accurate assessments of energy expenditure and help guide nutrition delivery in COVID-19 ICU patients.
  5 in total

1.  Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.).

Authors:  Stephen A McClave; Beth E Taylor; Robert G Martindale; Malissa M Warren; Debbie R Johnson; Carol Braunschweig; Mary S McCarthy; Evangelia Davanos; Todd W Rice; Gail A Cresci; Jane M Gervasio; Gordon S Sacks; Pamela R Roberts; Charlene Compher
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  The clinical evaluation of the new indirect calorimeter developed by the ICALIC project.

Authors:  Taku Oshima; Marta Delsoglio; Yves M Dupertuis; Pierre Singer; Elisabeth De Waele; Cecilia Veraar; Claudia-Paula Heidegger; Jan Wernermann; Paul E Wischmeyer; Mette M Berger; Claude Pichard
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 7.324

3.  Components of energy expenditure in patients with severe sepsis and major trauma: a basis for clinical care.

Authors:  M Uehara; L D Plank; G L Hill
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Pierre Singer; Annika Reintam Blaser; Mette M Berger; Waleed Alhazzani; Philip C Calder; Michael P Casaer; Michael Hiesmayr; Konstantin Mayer; Juan Carlos Montejo; Claude Pichard; Jean-Charles Preiser; Arthur R H van Zanten; Simon Oczkowski; Wojciech Szczeklik; Stephan C Bischoff
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 7.324

5.  The effect of cisatracurium infusion on the energy expenditure of critically ill patients: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  W A C Koekkoek; Y A Menger; F J L van Zanten; D van Dijk; A R H van Zanten
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total
  32 in total

1.  Nutritional parameters and outcomes in patients admitted to intensive care with COVID-19: a retrospective single-centre service evaluation.

Authors:  Timothy Eden; Shane McAuliffe; Dominic Crocombe; Jonathan Neville; Sumantra Ray
Journal:  BMJ Nutr Prev Health       Date:  2021-08-06

Review 2.  Nutritional priorities in patients with severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Zudin A Puthucheary; Todd W Rice
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.620

3.  Point-Counterpoint: Indirect Calorimetry Is Essential for Optimal Nutrition Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Paul E Wischmeyer; Jeroen Molinger; Krista Haines
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.080

Review 4.  Indirect calorimetry in critical illness: a new standard of care?

Authors:  Elisabeth De Waele; Joop Jonckheer; Paul E Wischmeyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.359

5.  Successful use of mild therapeutic hypothermia as compassionate treatment for severe refractory hypoxemia in COVID-19.

Authors:  Pablo Cruces; Camila Cores; Daniel Casanova; Federico Pizarro; Franco Díaz
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 6.  Overcoming challenges to enteral nutrition delivery in critical care.

Authors:  Paul E Wischmeyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.687

Review 7.  Nutrition guidelines for critically ill adults admitted with COVID-19: Is there consensus?

Authors:  Lee-Anne S Chapple; Oana A Tatucu-Babet; Kate J Lambell; Kate Fetterplace; Emma J Ridley
Journal:  Clin Nutr ESPEN       Date:  2021-05-25

8.  Energy requirements of long-term ventilated COVID-19 patients with resolved SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Janusz von Renesse; Simone von Bonin; Hanns-Christoph Held; Ralph Schneider; Adrian M Seifert; Lena Seifert; Peter Spieth; Jürgen Weitz; Thilo Welsch; Ronny Meisterfeld
Journal:  Clin Nutr ESPEN       Date:  2021-06-29

Review 9.  Energetic dysfunction in sepsis: a narrative review.

Authors:  Sebastien Preau; Dominique Vodovar; Boris Jung; Steve Lancel; Lara Zafrani; Aurelien Flatres; Mehdi Oualha; Guillaume Voiriot; Youenn Jouan; Jeremie Joffre; Fabrice Uhel; Nicolas De Prost; Stein Silva; Eric Azabou; Peter Radermacher
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 6.925

10.  Adherence to COVID-19 Nutrition Guidelines Is Associated with Better Nutritional Management Behaviors of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Amelia Faradina; Sung-Hui Tseng; Dang Khanh Ngan Ho; Esti Nurwanti; Hamam Hadi; Sintha Dewi Purnamasari; Imaning Yulia Rochmah; Jung-Su Chang
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.