Literature DB >> 33734477

Point-Counterpoint: Indirect Calorimetry Is Essential for Optimal Nutrition Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit.

Paul E Wischmeyer1, Jeroen Molinger2, Krista Haines3.   

Abstract

Iatrogenic malnutrition and underfeeding are ubiquitous in intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide for prolonged periods after ICU admission. A major driver leading to the lack of emphasis on timely ICU nutrition delivery is lack of objective data to guide nutrition care. If we are to ultimately overcome current fundamental challenges to effective ICU nutrition delivery, we must all adopt routine objective, longitudinal measurement of energy targets via indirect calorimetry (IC). Key evidence supporting the routine use of IC in the ICU includes (1) universal societal ICU nutrition guidelines recommending IC to determine energy requirements; (2) data showing predictive equations or body weight calculations that are consistently inaccurate and correlate poorly with measured energy expenditure, ultimately leading to routine overfeeding and underfeeding, which are both associated with poor ICU outcomes; (3) recent development and worldwide availability of a new validated, accurate, easy-to-use IC device; and (4) recent data in ICU patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) showing progressive hypermetabolism throughout ICU stay, emphasizing the inaccuracy of predictive equations and marked day-to-day variability in nutrition needs. Thus, given the availability of a new validated IC device, these findings emphasize that routine longitudinal IC measures should be considered the new standard of care for ICU and post-ICU nutrition delivery. As we would not deliver vasopressors without accurate blood pressure measurements, the ICU community is only likely to embrace an increased focus on the importance of early nutrition delivery when we can consistently provide objective IC measures to ensure personalized nutrition care delivers the right nutrition dose, in the right patient, at the right time to optimize clinical outcomes.
© 2021 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  critical illness; energy expenditure; indirect calorimetry; intensive care unit; malnutrition; nutrition support

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33734477      PMCID: PMC8276639          DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract        ISSN: 0884-5336            Impact factor:   3.080


  38 in total

1.  Indirect calorimetry in mechanically ventilated patients. A systematic comparison of three instruments.

Authors:  Martin Sundström; Inga Tjäder; Olav Rooyackers; Jan Wernerman
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 7.324

2.  Determining the Accuracy and Reliability of Indirect Calorimeters Utilizing the Methanol Combustion Technique.

Authors:  Sepideh Kaviani; Dale A Schoeller; Eric Ravussin; Edward L Melanson; Sarah T Henes; Lara R Dugas; Ronald E Dechert; George Mitri; Paul F M Schoffelen; Pim Gubbels; Asa Tornberg; Stephen Garland; Marco Akkermans; Jamie A Cooper
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.080

Review 3.  Feeding the critically ill patient.

Authors:  Stephen A McClave; Robert G Martindale; Todd W Rice; Daren K Heyland
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  Severe Covid-19.

Authors:  David A Berlin; Roy M Gulick; Fernando J Martinez
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Evaluation of three indirect calorimetry devices in mechanically ventilated patients: which device compares best with the Deltatrac II(®)? A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Séverine Graf; Véronique Laurie Karsegard; Valérie Viatte; Claudia Paula Heidegger; Yvan Fleury; Claude Pichard; Laurence Genton
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 7.324

6.  Nutrition support in the critical care setting: current practice in canadian ICUs--opportunities for improvement?

Authors:  Daren K Heyland; Deborah Schroter-Noppe; John W Drover; Minto Jain; Laurie Keefe; Rupinder Dhaliwal; Andrew Day
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Predictive equations versus measured energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry: A retrospective validation.

Authors:  Oren Zusman; Ilya Kagan; Itai Bendavid; Miriam Theilla; Jonathan Cohen; Pierre Singer
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 8.  Tailoring nutrition therapy to illness and recovery.

Authors:  Paul E Wischmeyer
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  The effect of cisatracurium infusion on the energy expenditure of critically ill patients: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  W A C Koekkoek; Y A Menger; F J L van Zanten; D van Dijk; A R H van Zanten
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Persistent hypermetabolism and longitudinal energy expenditure in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  John Whittle; Jeroen Molinger; David MacLeod; Krista Haines; Paul E Wischmeyer
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Nutrition Therapy in Non-intubated Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure.

Authors:  Nadine Sbaih; Kelly Hawthorne; Jennifer Lutes; Rodrigo Cavallazzi
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2021-08-31

Review 2.  Indirect calorimetry in critical illness: a new standard of care?

Authors:  Elisabeth De Waele; Joop Jonckheer; Paul E Wischmeyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  Measured Energy Expenditure Using Indirect Calorimetry in Post-Intensive Care Unit Hospitalized Survivors: A Comparison with Predictive Equations.

Authors:  Anne-Françoise Rousseau; Marjorie Fadeur; Camille Colson; Benoit Misset
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 6.706

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.