| Literature DB >> 32984952 |
Jeanne Tie1,2,3,4, Joshua D Cohen5, Serigne N Lo6,7,8, Yuxuan Wang5, Lu Li9, Michael Christie1,4,10, Margaret Lee1,2,11,12, Rachel Wong1,11,12, Suzanne Kosmider2, Iain Skinner2, Hui Li Wong1,3, Belinda Lee1,3, Matthew E Burge13, Desmond Yip14, Christos S Karapetis15, Timothy J Price16, Niall C Tebbutt17, Andrew M Haydon18, Janine Ptak5, Mary J Schaeffer5, Natalie Silliman5, Lisa Dobbyn5, Maria Popoli5, Cristian Tomasetti7,19, Nickolas Papadopoulos5, Kenneth W Kinzler5, Bert Vogelstein5, Peter Gibbs1,2,4.
Abstract
Studies in multiple solid tumor types have demonstrated the prognostic significance of ctDNA analysis after curative intent surgery. A combined analysis of data across completed studies could further our understanding of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a prognostic marker and inform future trial design. We combined individual patient data from three independent cohort studies of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Plasma samples were collected 4 to 10 weeks after surgery. Mutations in ctDNA were assayed using a massively parallel sequencing technique called SafeSeqS. We analyzed 485 CRC patients (230 Stage II colon, 96 Stage III colon, and 159 locally advanced rectum). ctDNA was detected after surgery in 59 (12%) patients overall (11.0%, 12.5% and 13.8% for samples taken at 4-6, 6-8 and 8-10 weeks; P = .740). ctDNA detection was associated with poorer 5-year recurrence-free (38.6% vs 85.5%; P < .001) and overall survival (64.6% vs 89.4%; P < .001). The predictive accuracy of postsurgery ctDNA for recurrence was higher than that of individual clinicopathologic risk features. Recurrence risk increased exponentially with increasing ctDNA mutant allele frequency (MAF) (hazard ratio, 1.2, 2.5 and 5.8 for MAF of 0.1%, 0.5% and 1%). Postsurgery ctDNA was detected in 3 of 20 (15%) patients with locoregional and 27 of 60 (45%) with distant recurrence (P = .018). This analysis demonstrates a consistent long-term impact of ctDNA as a prognostic marker across nonmetastatic CRC, where ctDNA outperforms other clinicopathologic risk factors and MAF further stratifies recurrence risk. ctDNA is a better predictor of distant vs locoregional recurrence.Entities:
Keywords: circulating tumor DNA; colorectal cancer; prognosis; recurrence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32984952 PMCID: PMC8818130 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33312
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cancer ISSN: 0020-7136 Impact factor: 7.396