Literature DB >> 32983763

Use of the Omental Free Flap for Treatment of Chronic Anterior Skull Base Infections.

George Kokosis1, Joshua Vorstenbosch1, Arianna Lombardi1, Meghana G Shamsunder1, Babak Mehrara1, Geoffrey E Hespe2, Laura Wang1, Cameron W Brennan3, Ian Ganly4, Evan Matros1.   

Abstract

Chronic complications following anterior cranial fossa tumor extirpation, such as cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, mucocele, pneumocephalus, and abscess, negatively impact patient quality of life. Robust vascularized tissue is generally required to adequately reconstruct and obliterate this complex geometric space. The aim of this study was to describe outcomes and advantages of the omental flap for these defects. Following institutional review board approval, a prospective, reconstructive database was reviewed from 2011 to 2020. Four patients with chronic anterior skull base complications treated with omental flap reconstruction were identified, with chart reviews performed. Median time from the index operation until the complication ultimately required a free omental transfer was 7.3 years. All patients underwent adjuvant radiation with the indications for surgery, including cerebral abscess, recurrent meningitis, osteomyelitis, and pneumocephalus. All free flaps survived without any need for revision. There were no donor site complications. One patient had delayed healing at an adjacent nasal wound that healed secondarily. At a median follow-up of 19.4 months, none of the patients had recurrent infections. The omental free flap has a number of properties, which make it ideally suitable for anterior skull base defects. Its malleable nature combined with the presence of multiple vascular arcades enable flexibility in flap design to contour to the crevices of 3-dimensional skull base defects. Although other free flaps are available to the plastic surgeon, the versatility and reliability of the omentum make it a first-line consideration for anterior skull base reconstruction.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32983763      PMCID: PMC7489647          DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open        ISSN: 2169-7574


INTRODUCTION

Open craniofacial tumor resection followed by postoperative radiation therapy can result in significant complications. Communication with the nasal cavity, paranasal sinus, or external skin predisposes patients to chronic infection. Once skull base infections occur, they result in repeated episodes of meningitis, subdural or intradural abscess, and can even be associated with seizures.[1,2] Whether by the endoscopic or open approach, the primary treatment option for skull base defects is the interposition of vascularized tissue separating the contaminated nasal cavity from the sterile, central nervous system. The first line of treatment for open craniofacial surgery tumor resection includes local tissue, such as the pericranial, the nasal septal, temporal parietal fascial, and temporalis muscle flaps.[3-7] However, for larger defects or those affected by radiation, chronic infection, or recurrent tumor, local tissues are either no longer available or insufficient, necessitating free tissue transfer. A case series of chronic anterior skull base complications illustrating the advantages of the omental free flap for reconstruction is described.

METHODS

Following institutional review board approval, a search was performed of a prospective database to identify all open skull base reconstructions performed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between March 2011 and June 2019. Demographics, surgical characteristics, and outcomes such as infection, recurrence, wound healing complications, and flap failure were considered when evaluating the effectiveness of omental flaps.

RESULTS

Four patients were identified during the study period (Table 1). All 4 patients had adjuvant radiation treatment after resection. The nature of the chronic complication included osteomyelitis, pneumocephalus, chronic wound, meningitis, and brain abscess. Median time from the index operation until the complication ultimately requiring a free omental transfer was 7.3 years. The median follow-up was 19.4 months. All flaps were harvested through a laparotomy by the 2 plastic surgeons (B.M. and E.M.) who are fully trained in general surgery. The omentum was anastomosed to the superficial temporal vessels and healed well. One patient had an area of delayed healing at an adjacent nasal wound that ultimately healed. No revisionary procedures were necessary. No patient had recurrent infection following omental transfer. One patient subsequently required an ipsilateral neck dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for recurrent esthesioneuroblastoma 5 years after the omental transfer (and 13 years after the index oncologic operation). Additionally, there were no complications recorded related to the abdominal donor site.
Table 1.

Demographics, Complication Characteristics, and Outcomes following Free Omental Transfer

Patient Number
1234
SexWomanWomanManWoman
Age at diagnosis (y)77466227
Date of surgeryMarch 2011June 2003August 2006June 1974
Type of approachEndoscopic, followed by craniofacial resectionCraniofacial resectionCraniofacial resectionUnknown, followed by craniofacial resection
PathologySinonasal salivary adenocarcinomaEsthesioneuroblastomaEsthesioneuroblastomaGiant cell tumor of maxillary sinus
Adjuvant radiation (yes/no)YesYesYesYes
Type of complicationChronic infection of nasal cavity and base of skullIntermittent CSF leak, pneumocephalusInfected bone plate and frontal lobe abscess, forehead woundRecurrent sinus infections, osteomyelitis of left frontal bone skull base, meningitis, intracranial abscess
Intervention before free omentumSerial debridements, antibiotics (2017)Lumbar–peritoneal shunt (2003), forehead flap (2009)Washout, plate replacement, local closure (2006)Craniectomy, frontal sinus cranialization (2018)
Date of free omentumMay 2018March 2011June 2011March 2019
Defect typeLateral rhinotomy to skull baseFrontal sinus to skull base defectFontal sinus and nasofrontal ductFrontal sinus to skull base, nasofrontal duct
Status at follow-upNED, no infectionNED, no CSF leakNED, no infectionNED
Operative time (min)533550514445

CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; NED, no evidence of disease.

Demographics, Complication Characteristics, and Outcomes following Free Omental Transfer CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; NED, no evidence of disease.

CASE REPORT

A 76-year-old man with a history of esthesioneuroblastoma underwent craniofacial resection and dural graft placement in 2006. His early postoperative course was complicated by left frontal lobe hemorrhagic stroke, seizures, and surgical site infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Following multiple operative debridement and long-term antibiotic treatment, he ultimately required hardware removal almost a year later. His course was further complicated by recurrent brain abscesses (Fig. 1) and pneumocephalus, requiring transnasal debridement twice in 2013 and 2014 with multiple courses of antibiotics.
Fig. 1.

MRI of the brain showing a peripherally enhancing multiloculated collection involving the left (long arrow) more than right frontal lobes (small arrow) and parasinuses, consistent with an abscess. MRI indicates magnetic resonance imaging.

MRI of the brain showing a peripherally enhancing multiloculated collection involving the left (long arrow) more than right frontal lobes (small arrow) and parasinuses, consistent with an abscess. MRI indicates magnetic resonance imaging. In June 2015, he ultimately underwent a debridement of the frontal lobe abscess, and autologous cranioplasty by the neurosurgery team followed by a free omental transfer. The defect encountered at the end of the debridement by the neurosurgical team was a large dead space anterior to the frontal lobe, occupying the site of the former frontal sinus (Fig. 2). The defect was a long narrow tunnel communicating directly with the nasal cavity. The right gastroepiploic vessels of the omentum were anastomosed to the left superficial temporal vessels. The flap was used to fill the abscess cavity and obliterate the dead space into the nasal cavity (Fig. 3A). Finally, a cranioplasty was performed over the omentum (Fig. 3B). The patient recovered well and was sent home on postoperative day 12. His last follow-up was 11.5 months postoperatively, at which point, his examination was unremarkable and interval imaging revealed no evidence of infection or disease recurrence.
Fig. 2.

Intraoperative photograph after debridement showing the anterior cranial fossa defect requiring coverage.

Fig. 3.

The omentum was transferred to the calvaria and was used to occupy the dead space in the anterior cranial fossa following the debridement (A). Immediate result after inset of the omentum and completion of a cranioplasty (B).

Intraoperative photograph after debridement showing the anterior cranial fossa defect requiring coverage. The omentum was transferred to the calvaria and was used to occupy the dead space in the anterior cranial fossa following the debridement (A). Immediate result after inset of the omentum and completion of a cranioplasty (B).

DISCUSSION

Initial efforts at anterior skull base reconstruction are typically performed using local flaps; however, larger defects of the skull base, especially including the frontal sinus and nasofrontal duct, are challenging to manage and are prone to chronic complications. When these occur, more robust vascularized tissue in the form of a free flap is usually required.[6-8] The omental free flap was first described for scalp defect coverage.[9] It has since being widely used in head and neck reconstruction because it has a variety of properties that make it suitable for reconstruction of such defects.[10,11] Previously referred to as “vascular putty,” its moldable, pliable nature helps it contour to crevices and obliterate complex 3-dimensional skull base defects; this is in contrast to other fasciocutaneous or myocutaneous flaps that are not as malleable and therefore difficult to fabricate. Other advantages include its robust vascular supply, long vascular pedicle, large surface area with ability to cover defects of various sizes, minimal donor site morbidity, and immunogenic properties.[12,13] Finally, the large number of vascular arcades enable the flap to be tailored and trimmed to appropriately match the skull base defect. For example, the flap can be divided between the vascular arcades, allowing a portion of the flap to lie within the skull base defect and another portion outside the cranial vault beneath the skin, which is often radiated. Perhaps, the principle limitation to omental flap use is the need for laparotomy, which can uncommonly lead to complications, including abdominal hernia or injury to intra-abdominal organs.[14] This can be optimized by a minimally invasive harvest of the omentum.[11,12] As an alternative to the omentum, several other free flaps have been described for anterior cranial base reconstruction. The rectus abdominis flap is perhaps the most common free flap used for reconstruction.[2] Disadvantages of this flap include a large abdominal scar and risk of hernia development.[2] Thigh-based flaps (including the anterolateral thigh [ALT], vastus lateralis, and tensor fascia lata) are also effective for obliteration of anterior cranial fossa defects.[15,16] One of the major disadvantages of the ALT is the unpredictable pedicle length and perforator distribution, but this may be somewhat minimized by preoperative imaging. The lateral arm is a relatively thin, pliable flap that does not sacrifice a major artery, but has a short pedicle.[2,17] In contrast, the radial forearm is also thin, pliable free flap but has a much longer pedicle length. However, it is associated with disadvantages such as donor site cosmesis with necessity for a skin graft and potential numbness of the donor hand in the radial nerve distribution.[18] Finally, the latissimus dorsi is a large myocutaneous flap with a long, reliable, vascular pedicle that can be used to reconstruct particularly large defects with minimal donor site morbidity.[19] Perhaps the principal drawback with any of the aforementioned options relative to the omentum is the lack of pliability of any fasciocutaneous or muscle flap with inability to contour to the thin narrow and 3-dimensional geometry of anterior skull base defects. Herein 4 complex reconstructive cases are used to illustrate the merits and low complication rate of the omentum flap to obliterate dead space and deliver vascularized tissue to reconstruct anterior cranial fossa defects.
  19 in total

1.  Skull base reconstruction with pedicled nasoseptal flap: Technique, indications, and limitations.

Authors:  Gilles Reuter; Olivier Bouchain; Laurent Demanez; Félix Scholtes; Didier Martin
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  Anterior and anterolateral resection for skull base malignancies: techniques and complication avoidance.

Authors:  Joshua Marcus; Ilya Laufer; Babak Mehrara; Dennis Kraus; Bhuvanesh Singh; Mark H Bilsky
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Skull base reconstruction: an updated approach.

Authors:  Matthew M Hanasono; Amanda Silva; Roman J Skoracki; Paul W Gidley; Franco DeMonte; Ehab Y Hanna; David W Chang; Peirong Yu
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  The vastus lateralis muscle flap in head and neck reconstruction: an alternative flap for soft tissue defects.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Joseph M Serletti; Liza C Wu
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.539

5.  The Laparoscopically Harvested Omental Free Flap: A Compelling Option for Craniofacial and Cranial Base Reconstruction.

Authors:  Peter D Costantino; David Shamouelian; Tristan Tham; Robert Andrews; Wojciech Dec
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-12-07

6.  Treatment of recurrent cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea with a free vascularized omental flap: a case report.

Authors:  E Y Normington; F A Papay; R J Yetman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Septal floor rotational flap pedicled on ethmoidal arteries for endoscopic skull base reconstruction.

Authors:  Song Mao; Mingxian Li; Dawei Li; Hai Lin; Haibo Ye; Ru Tang; Kaiming Su; Weitian Zhang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-04-07       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Simplifying microvascular head and neck reconstruction: a rational approach to donor site selection.

Authors:  J J Disa; A L Pusic; D H Hidalgo; P G Cordeiro
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 9.  Open Anterior Skull Base Reconstruction: A Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Daniel Kwon; Alfred Iloreta; Brett Miles; Jared Inman
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.314

10.  The anterolateral thigh free flap for skull base reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew M Hanasono; Justin M Sacks; Neha Goel; Martina Ayad; Roman J Skoracki
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  1 in total

1.  Endoscopic Endonasal Repair of Recurrent Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak With Adipofascial Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Namra Qadeer; Babak J Mehrara; Marc Cohen; Viviane Tabar; Farooq Shahzad
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2022-08-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.