Literature DB >> 21572377

Skull base reconstruction: an updated approach.

Matthew M Hanasono1, Amanda Silva, Roman J Skoracki, Paul W Gidley, Franco DeMonte, Ehab Y Hanna, David W Chang, Peirong Yu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors' goal was to develop an updated and comprehensive algorithm for skull base reconstruction based on data from the 10-year period following their initial report.
METHODS: Reconstructive outcomes were analyzed from 250 patients undergoing skull base reconstruction from 2000 to 2009.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine local or regional pedicled flap reconstructions and 211 free flap reconstructions were performed. Free flaps were usually selected over pedicled flaps for patients with a history of prior surgery, irradiation, or chemotherapy (p = 0.003, p < 0.001, and p = 0.04, respectively). Reconstructions were performed for 36 region I defects, 39 region II defects, 124 region III defects, and 51 defects involving more than one region. Complications occurred in 29.6 percent of patients. There were no significant differences in the overall complication rates between pedicled and free flap reconstructions (p = 0.70). The recipient-site complication rate decreased from 31 percent in the authors' prior report to 18.4 percent. A facial nerve repair was performed in 30 patients. By 12 months, 75 percent of patients had signs of reinnervation. Recovery was not significantly less likely in patients with preoperative weakness, postoperative irradiation, or age 60 years or older (p = 1.00, p = 1.00, and p = 0.11, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the largest series of skull base reconstructions to date, the authors recommend pedicled flaps for limited defects because of minimal donor-site morbidity and shorter operative times and hospital stays. For extensive defects and cases involving prior surgery, irradiation, or chemotherapy, free flaps are preferred. Facial nerve repair should be attempted whenever feasible, even in the setting of preoperative weakness, anticipated postoperative irradiation, or advanced age. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21572377     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318221dcef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

1.  Surgical Management of Skull Base Osteoradionecrosis in the Cancer Population - Treatment Outcomes and Predictors of Recurrence: A Case Series.

Authors:  Ahmed Habib; Matthew M Hanasono; Franco DeMonte; Ali Haider; Jonathan D Breshears; Marc-Elie Nader; Paul W Gidley; Shirley Y Su; Ehab Y Hanna; Shaan M Raza
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.703

2.  Fascia Lata Free Flap Anastomosed to the Superior Trochlear System for Reconstruction of the Anterior Skull Base.

Authors:  Camilo Reyes; C Arturo Solares; Michael A Fritz; Michael Groves; Heather Bentley
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-05-08

3.  Anterior cranial base reconstruction with a reverse temporalis muscle flap and calvarial bone graft.

Authors:  Seung Gee Kwon; Yong Oock Kim; Dong Kyun Rah
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-07-13

Review 4.  Reconstruction after open surgery for skull-base malignancies.

Authors:  Matthew M Hanasono
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Anatomic Considerations of Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Leila J Mady; Thomas M Kaffenberger; Khalil Baddour; Katie Melder; Neal R Godse; Paul Gardner; Carl H Snyderman; Mario G Solari; Mark W Kubik; Eric W Wang; Shaum Sridharan
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-02-22

6.  Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Angiography for Assessing Flap Perfusion in Skull Base Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Noah Shaikh; Daniel O'Brien; Chadi Makary; Meghan Turner
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-07-19

7.  Scalp reconstruction using the reverse temporalis muscle flap: a case report.

Authors:  Youngsu Na; Donghyeok Shin; Hyungon Choi; Jeenam Kim; Myungchul Lee
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2022-06-20

8.  Increased Defect Size is Associated with Increased Complication Rate after Free Tissue Transfer for Midanterior Skull-Base Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ryota Nakamura; Keisuke Takanari; Yutaka Nakamura; Miki Kambe; Masashi Hishida; Katsumi Ebisawa; Yasushi Fujimoto; Masazumi Fujii; Yuzuru Kamei
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-26

9.  Examining the relationship of immunotherapy and wound complications following flap reconstruction in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Ashley C Mays; Bharat Yarlagadda; Virginie Achim; Ryan Jackson; Patrik Pipkorn; Andrew T Huang; Karthik Rajasekaran; Shaum Sridharan; Andrew J Rosko; Ryan K Orosco; Andrew M Coughlin; Mark K Wax; Yelizaveta Shnayder; William C Spanos; Donald Gregory Farwell; Lee S McDaniel; Matthew M Hanasono
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.147

10.  Use of the Omental Free Flap for Treatment of Chronic Anterior Skull Base Infections.

Authors:  George Kokosis; Joshua Vorstenbosch; Arianna Lombardi; Meghana G Shamsunder; Babak Mehrara; Geoffrey E Hespe; Laura Wang; Cameron W Brennan; Ian Ganly; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-08-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.