Literature DB >> 12035034

Utility of the omentum in the reconstruction of complex extraperitoneal wounds and defects: donor-site complications in 135 patients from 1975 to 2000.

C Scott Hultman1, Grant W Carlson, Albert Losken, Glyn Jones, John Culbertson, Gregory Mackay, John Bostwick, M J Jurkiewicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine donor-site complications after omental harvest for the reconstruction of extraperitoneal wounds and defects. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The omentum, with its immunologic and angiogenic properties, is a versatile organ with well-documented utility in the reconstruction of complex wounds and defects. However, the need for laparotomy and the potential for intraabdominal complications have been cited as relative contraindications to the use of the omentum as a reconstructive flap. Further, few series have assessed long-term results, and no reports have focused on donor-site complications.
METHODS: Patients who underwent reconstruction of extraperitoneal defects with the omentum at a single university healthcare system were identified by searching discharge databases and office records. Charts were reviewed to determine patient demographics, surgical indications and technique, postoperative complications, and outpatient follow-up. Patients with donor-site complications were compared with patients who had no complications using the Student t test and chi-square analysis. Statistical significance was defined at P <.05.
RESULTS: From 1975 to 2000, the authors successfully harvested 135 omental flaps (64 pedicled, 71 free transfer) for reconstruction of the following defects: scalp (n = 16), intracranial (n = 1), orbitofacial (n = 33), neck (n = 8), upper extremity (n = 7), lower extremity (n = 4), intrathoracic (n = 3), sternal (n = 34), breast (n = 3), chest wall (n = 18), abdominal wall (n = 1), and perineal (n = 7). Donor-site complications in 25 patients (18.5%) included abdominal wall infection (n = 9), fascial dehiscence (n = 8), symptomatic hernia (n = 8), unplanned reexploration (n = 6), postoperative ileus (n = 3), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n = 2), delayed splenic rupture (n = 1), gastric outlet obstruction (n = 1), and late partial small bowel obstruction (n = 1). Factors associated with increased donor-site complications included the use of pedicled flaps (compared with free tissue transfer), mediastinitis, advanced age, and pulmonary failure. Of note, 53 patients had undergone previous abdominal surgery; of these, 26 patients required extensive adhesiolysis and 4 patients sustained enterotomies. Eleven patients (8.1%) had partial flap loss and three patients (2.2%) had total flap loss. Mean length of stay was 28 days. Average follow-up was 2.4 years. The death rate was 5.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: The omentum can be safely harvested and reliably used to reconstruct a diverse range of extraperitoneal wounds and defects. Donor-site complications can be significant but are usually limited to abdominal wall infection and hernia. Risk factors associated with complications include the use of pedicled flaps, mediastinitis, and pulmonary failure. This low rate of donor-site complications strongly supports the use of the omentum in the reconstruction of complex wounds and defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12035034      PMCID: PMC1422507          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200206000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  33 in total

1.  Long-term results of pectoralis major muscle transposition for infected sternotomy wounds.

Authors:  P C Pairolero; P G Arnold; J B Harris
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Use of the omentum in chest-wall reconstruction.

Authors:  R J Fix; L O Vasconez
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Neovaginal reconstruction after exenteration using an omental flap and split-thickness skin graft.

Authors:  J F Kusiak; N G Rosenblum
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Free transfer of the greater omentum.

Authors:  B L Shilov; N O Milanov
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.539

5.  Laparoscopic-assisted bipedicle omental flap mobilization for reconstruction of a chest wall defect.

Authors:  C J Corral; J B Prystowsky; T A Weidrich; G D Harris
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1994-10

6.  Use of omental transposition flaps for soft-tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  P G Arnold; D J Witzke; G B Irons; J E Woods
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Basic fibroblast growth factor expression in human omental microvascular endothelial cells and the effect of phorbol ester.

Authors:  A Bikfalvi; J Alterio; A L Inyang; E Dupuy; M Laurent; M P Hartmann; L Vigny; D Raulais; Y Courtois; G Tobelem
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 6.384

8.  The use of omental transposition in the treatment of recurrent sarcoma of the back.

Authors:  D Ladin; R Rees; E Wilkins; V Sondak; J McGillicuddy
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  The omentum: its use as a free vascularized graft for reconstruction of the head and neck.

Authors:  M J Jurkiewicz; F Nahai
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Transposition of the greater omentum for recalcitrant median sternotomy wound infections.

Authors:  N Weinzweig; R Yetman
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.539

View more
  19 in total

1.  Uncommon flaps for chest wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Evan Matros; Joseph J Disa
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  The pedicled 'policeman' flap salvage of exposed vascular prosthesis - a case report.

Authors:  Mohammed Ellabban; Deemish Oudit; Mark Lambert; Ali Juma
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  [Thoracic wall defect reconstruction and dead space obliteration with an intra-/extrathoracic free flap].

Authors:  P S Harenberg; A W Viol; T A D'Amico; L S Levin; D Erdmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  The omentum: anatomical, metabolic, and surgical aspects.

Authors:  Danielle Collins; Aisling M Hogan; Donal O'Shea; Des C Winter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a two-centre experience in the era of intensified oncological treatment.

Authors:  Gijsbert D Musters; Didi A M Sloothaak; Sapho Roodbeen; Anna A W van Geloven; Willem A Bemelman; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The Laparoscopically Harvested Omental Free Flap: A Compelling Option for Craniofacial and Cranial Base Reconstruction.

Authors:  Peter D Costantino; David Shamouelian; Tristan Tham; Robert Andrews; Wojciech Dec
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-12-07

7.  Endocarditis with left ventricular cutaneous fistula after aortic root replacement with a valved conduit.

Authors:  Laura Hollinger; Lynda Perryman; Michael J Reardon
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2010

8.  Omental free-tissue transfer for coverage of complex upper extremity and hand defects--the forgotten flap.

Authors:  Iris A Seitz; Craig S Williams; Thomas A Wiedrich; Ginard Henry; John G Seiler; Loren S Schechter
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-03-25

Review 9.  Omental flap for treatment of long standing lymphoedema of the lower limb: can it end the suffering? Report of four cases with review of literatures.

Authors:  Saad Muwafaq Attash; Mohammad Yaseen Al-Sheikh
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-02-08

10.  Bilateral latissimus dorsi flaps for the reconstruction of extensive scalp defects.

Authors:  T Zhong; Pj Gullane; Pc Neligan
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.