| Literature DB >> 32980415 |
P Sabarinathan1, K Rajkumar2, V E Annamalai3, K Vishal4.
Abstract
A novel cellulosic fibre was extracted from the peduncle portion of the fish tail palm tree and the extracted fish tail palm fibre was treated with different concentrations (1%, 5%, and 9%) of silane solution. The characteristic analysis on chemical, functional, mechanical and surface property of the extracted fish tail palm fibres were investigated through chemical composition analysis, Fourier Transform InfraRed spectroscopy (FT-IR), single fibre tensile test, and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Chemical analysis results indicate that silane treatment improved the cellulose content of the fish tail palm fibre. The highest cellulose content of 72.51% was observed in the 9% silane treated fish tail palm fibre. Also, it improved crystallinity index value of 62.5% for 5% silane treated fibre, which is confirmed through the X-ray diffraction analysis. FT-IR result indicates the removal of hemicellulose at characteristic wavelength of 1745 cm-1 for 5% silane treated fish tail palm fibre. Tensile property of the silane treated fish tail palm fibre (1, 5, and 9%) shows an increased tensile strength of 7.3%, 12%, and 6.6% as compared to raw fish tail palm fibre. Moreover, this type of novel natural fibres can reduce the cost while offering competent performance during the polymer-based product development.Entities:
Keywords: Natural fibre; Silane treatment; Single fibre tensile test
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32980415 PMCID: PMC7516396 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Macromol ISSN: 0141-8130 Impact factor: 6.953
Fig. 1Fish tail palm fibre processing (a) fish tail palm tree, (b) extracted fish tail palm fibre, and (c) chopped fish tail palm fibre.
Fig. 2Chemical composition analysis of various silane treated fish tail palm fibre.
Chemical composition analysis of fish tail palm fibre with existing natural fibre.
| Types of fibre | Cellulose (%) | Hemicellulose (%) | Lignin (%) | Extractives (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenaf | 53.14 | 14.3 | 8.18 | 0.8 | [ |
| Sisal | 60–78 | 10–14.2 | 8–14 | 2 | [ |
| Bamboo | 26–43 | 30 | 1–31 | – | [ |
| Jute | 72 | 13 | 13 | 0.5 | [ |
| Hemp | 74 | 18 | 4 | 2.3 | [ |
| Ferula cummins | 53.3 | 8.5 | 1.4 | – | [ |
| Flax | 81 | 14 | 3 | 1.7 | [ |
| 55.58 | 13.86 | 10.13 | 5.58 | [ | |
| Agave | 68.42 | 4.85 | 4.85 | 0.26 | [ |
| Fish tail palm fibre | 72.51 | 8.97 | 11.75 | 6.77 | Current work |
Fig. 3FT-IR spectra of untreated, silane treated with different composition of 1%, 5%, and 9% of fish tail palm fibre.
FT-IR spectra data of the extracted and chemical treated fish tail palm fibre.
| Wavelength range (cm−1) | Possible assignment | Types of fibre | Source | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFT | SFT1% | SFT5% | SFT9% | |||
| 3600–3000 | O-H stretching H-bonded alcohol, water, phenols | 3326 | 3322 | 3318 | 3314 | Cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin |
| 2500–3000 | C-H stretching vibration in | 2924 | 2928 | 2927 | 2924 | Cellulose, hemicellulose |
| 2000–1693 | =CO stretching vibration of carboxylic acid and ester groups of hemicellulose | 1745 | 1754 | 1743 | 1744 | Hemicellulose |
| 1693–1607 | absorbed water | 1639 | 1643 | 1641 | 1637 | Water |
| 1607–1486 | aromatic C | 1588 | 1584 | 1586 | 1582 | Lignin |
| 1486–1395 | CH2 bending | 1460 | 1464 | 1460 | 1461 | Cellulose |
| 1395–1347 | C-H bending | 1376 | 1382 | 1372 | 1370 | Cellulose |
| 1347–1286 | aromatic C—O bending | 1313 | 1315 | 1313 | 1318 | Lignin |
| 1286–1184 | -CO stretching of acetyl group | 1242 | – | – | – | Lignin |
| 1140–912 | C-O stretching vibration in cellulose | 1029 | 1032 | 1029 | 1021 | Cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin |
| 912–840 | β-Glucosidic linkage in cellulose | 897 | 901 | 893 | 893 | Cellulose |
EDX analysis of fish tail palm fibre.
| Types of sample | Carbon (C) | Oxygen (O) | Remaining elements (%) | O/C ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFT | 57.01 | 39.71 | 3.28 | 0.70 |
| SFT1% | 54.44 | 41.22 | 4.34 | 0.76 |
| SFT5% | 52.28 | 43.71 | 4.01 | 0.84 |
| SFT9% | 51.44 | 45.22 | 0.3.34 | 0.87 |
Fig. 4XRD analysis spectra of fish tail palm fibres.
Crystallinity content of fish tail palm fibre.
| Types of sample | Crystallinity index (%) |
|---|---|
| RFT | 51.2 |
| SFT1% | 58.3 |
| SFT5% | 62.5 |
| SFT9% | 60.1 |
Fig. 5SEM images of fish tail palm fibre (a) Untreated, (b) SFT1%, (C) SFT5%, and (d) SFT9%.
Tensile strength of untreated and silane treated fish tail palm fibre.
| Types of sample | Diameter | Tensile force | Tensile strength |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFT | 245 ± 14.21 | 1.92 ± 0.41 | 407.47 ± 121.11 |
| SFT1% | 237 ± 11.47 | 1.81 ± 0.54 | 433.15 ± 92.17 |
| SFT5% | 230 ± 11.19 | 2.02 ± 0.45 | 476.26 ± 114.35 |
| SFT9% | 224 ± 12.32 | 1.72 ± 0.33 | 434.14 ± 107.64 |
Fig. 6Stress-strain curve of untreated and treated fibres.
Properties of the current and recently explored natural fibres.
| Types of fibres | Cellulose (%) | Crystallinity Index (%) | Single fibre tensile strength (MPa) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fish tail palm fibre | 72.51 | 51.2 | 407.47 ± 121.11 | Current work |
| Ensete stem fibres | 56.05 | – | 513 ± 57.7 | [ |
| Cyrtostachys renda | 45.15 | 6 | – | [ |
| 53.7 | 33.33 | 38.1 ± 1.56 | [ | |
| 32.83 | 36.79 | – | [ | |
| 39.42 | 68.5 | – | [ | |
| Red banana peduncle | 72.9 | 62.1 | 440 ± 13.4 | [ |
| 64.54 | 63.78 | 640 ± 13.4 | [ | |
| 32 | 34.46 | 25.75 ± 2.45 | [ |