Literature DB >> 32978129

Improved Virus Isoelectric Point Estimation by Exclusion of Known and Predicted Genome-Binding Regions.

Joe Heffron1, Brooke K Mayer1.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the isoelectric points (pIs) of viruses is beneficial for predicting virus behavior in environmental transport and physical/chemical treatment applications. However, the empirically measured pIs of many viruses have thus far defied simple explanation, let alone prediction, based on the ionizable amino acid composition of the virus capsid. Here, we suggest an approach for predicting the pI of nonenveloped viruses by excluding capsid regions that stabilize the virus polynucleotide via electrostatic interactions. This method was applied first to viruses with known polynucleotide-binding regions (PBRs) and/or three-dimensional (3D) structures. Then, PBRs were predicted in a group of 32 unique viral capsid proteome sequences via conserved structures and sequence motifs. Removing predicted PBRs resulted in a significantly better fit to empirical pI values. After modification, mean differences between theoretical and empirical pI values were reduced from 2.1 ± 2.4 to 0.1 ± 1.7 pH units.IMPORTANCE This model fits predicted pIs to empirical values for a diverse set of viruses. The results suggest that many previously reported discrepancies between theoretical and empirical virus pIs can be explained by coulombic neutralization of PBRs of the inner capsid. Given the diversity of virus capsid structures, this nonarbitrary, heuristic approach to predicting virus pI offers an effective alternative to a simplistic, one-size-fits-all charge model of the virion. The accurate, structure-based prediction of PBRs of the virus capsid employed here may also be of general interest to structural virologists.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA binding; DNA-binding proteins; RNA binding; RNA-binding proteins; capsid; electrostatic; electrostatic model; modeling; pI; point of zero charge; polynucleotide; prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32978129      PMCID: PMC7657617          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01674-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  83 in total

1.  Electrostatic origin of the genome packing in viruses.

Authors:  Vladimir A Belyi; M Muthukumar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The influence of ionic strength on the interaction of viruses with charged surfaces under environmental conditions.

Authors:  C M Schaldach; William L Bourcier; Henry F Shaw; Brian E Viani; W D Wilson
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 8.128

3.  Aggregation of ampholine on heparin and other acidic polysaccharides in isoelectric focusing.

Authors:  P G Righetti; R P Brown; A L Stone
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1978-08-17

4.  Structures of the native and swollen forms of cowpea chlorotic mottle virus determined by X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy.

Authors:  J A Speir; S Munshi; G Wang; T S Baker; J E Johnson
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Host range and variability of calcium binding by surface loops in the capsids of canine and feline parvoviruses.

Authors:  A A Simpson; V Chandrasekar; B Hébert; G M Sullivan; M G Rossmann; C R Parrish
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-07-14       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Arginine-rich motifs present multiple interfaces for specific binding by RNA.

Authors:  Travis S Bayer; Lauren N Booth; Scott M Knudsen; Andrew D Ellington
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  X-ray crystallographic structure of the Norwalk virus capsid.

Authors:  B V Prasad; M E Hardy; T Dokland; J Bella; M G Rossmann; M K Estes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Viruses at Solid-Water Interfaces: A Systematic Assessment of Interactions Driving Adsorption.

Authors:  Antonius Armanious; Meret Aeppli; Ronald Jacak; Dominik Refardt; Thérèse Sigstam; Tamar Kohn; Michael Sander
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  The relationships between the isoelectric point and: length of proteins, taxonomy and ecology of organisms.

Authors:  Joanna Kiraga; Pawel Mackiewicz; Dorota Mackiewicz; Maria Kowalczuk; Przemysław Biecek; Natalia Polak; Kamila Smolarczyk; Miroslaw R Dudek; Stanislaw Cebrat
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  The Impact of Capsid Proteins on Virus Removal and Inactivation During Water Treatment Processes.

Authors:  Brooke K Mayer; Yu Yang; Daniel W Gerrity; Morteza Abbaszadegan
Journal:  Microbiol Insights       Date:  2015-11-08
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Virus Isoelectric Point Estimation: Theories and Methods.

Authors:  Joe Heffron; Brooke K Mayer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Chemodynamic features of nanoparticles: Application to understanding the dynamic life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 in aerosols and aqueous biointerfacial zones.

Authors:  Jérôme F L Duval; Herman P van Leeuwen; Willem Norde; Raewyn M Town
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 15.190

3.  First report of computational protein-ligand docking to evaluate susceptibility to HIV integrase inhibitors in HIV-infected Iranian patients.

Authors:  Farzane Ghasabi; Ava Hashempour; Nastaran Khodadad; Soudabeh Bemani; Parisa Keshani; Mohamad Javad Shekiba; Zahra Hasanshahi
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2022-03-29

4.  A Comparison of Porphyrin Photosensitizers in Photodynamic Inactivation of RNA and DNA Bacteriophages.

Authors:  Joe Heffron; Matthew Bork; Brooke K Mayer; Troy Skwor
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 5.048

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.