RATIONALE: The pathophysiologic causes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) likely vary among patients but have not been well characterized. OBJECTIVES: To define carefully the proportion of key anatomic and nonanatomic contributions in a relatively large cohort of patients with OSA and control subjects to identify pathophysiologic targets for future novel therapies for OSA. METHODS: Seventy-five men and women with and without OSA aged 20-65 years were studied on three separate nights. Initially, the apnea-hypopnea index was determined by polysomnography followed by determination of anatomic (passive critical closing pressure of the upper airway [Pcrit]) and nonanatomic (genioglossus muscle responsiveness, arousal threshold, and respiratory control stability; loop gain) contributions to OSA. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pathophysiologic traits varied substantially among participants. A total of 36% of patients with OSA had minimal genioglossus muscle responsiveness during sleep, 37% had a low arousal threshold, and 36% had high loop gain. A total of 28% had multiple nonanatomic features. Although overall the upper airway was more collapsible in patients with OSA (Pcrit, 0.3 [-1.5 to 1.9] vs. -6.2 [-12.4 to -3.6] cm H2O; P <0.01), 19% had a relatively noncollapsible upper airway similar to many of the control subjects (Pcrit, -2 to -5 cm H2O). In these patients, loop gain was almost twice as high as patients with a Pcrit greater than -2 cm H2O (-5.9 [-8.8 to -4.5] vs. -3.2 [-4.8 to -2.4] dimensionless; P = 0.01). A three-point scale for weighting the relative contribution of the traits is proposed. It suggests that nonanatomic features play an important role in 56% of patients with OSA. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that OSA is a heterogeneous disorder. Although Pcrit-anatomy is an important determinant, abnormalities in nonanatomic traits are also present in most patients with OSA.
RATIONALE: The pathophysiologic causes of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) likely vary among patients but have not been well characterized. OBJECTIVES: To define carefully the proportion of key anatomic and nonanatomic contributions in a relatively large cohort of patients with OSA and control subjects to identify pathophysiologic targets for future novel therapies for OSA. METHODS: Seventy-five men and women with and without OSA aged 20-65 years were studied on three separate nights. Initially, the apnea-hypopnea index was determined by polysomnography followed by determination of anatomic (passive critical closing pressure of the upper airway [Pcrit]) and nonanatomic (genioglossus muscle responsiveness, arousal threshold, and respiratory control stability; loop gain) contributions to OSA. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pathophysiologic traits varied substantially among participants. A total of 36% of patients with OSA had minimal genioglossus muscle responsiveness during sleep, 37% had a low arousal threshold, and 36% had high loop gain. A total of 28% had multiple nonanatomic features. Although overall the upper airway was more collapsible in patients with OSA (Pcrit, 0.3 [-1.5 to 1.9] vs. -6.2 [-12.4 to -3.6] cm H2O; P <0.01), 19% had a relatively noncollapsible upper airway similar to many of the control subjects (Pcrit, -2 to -5 cm H2O). In these patients, loop gain was almost twice as high as patients with a Pcrit greater than -2 cm H2O (-5.9 [-8.8 to -4.5] vs. -3.2 [-4.8 to -2.4] dimensionless; P = 0.01). A three-point scale for weighting the relative contribution of the traits is proposed. It suggests that nonanatomic features play an important role in 56% of patients with OSA. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that OSA is a heterogeneous disorder. Although Pcrit-anatomy is an important determinant, abnormalities in nonanatomic traits are also present in most patients with OSA.
Authors: Richard B Berry; David P White; John Roper; Giora Pillar; Robert B Fogel; Michael Stanchina; Atul Malhotra Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2003-01-17
Authors: Amy S Jordan; Andrew Wellman; Jill K Edwards; Karen Schory; Louise Dover; Mary MacDonald; Sanjay R Patel; Robert B Fogel; Atul Malhotra; David P White Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2005-06-30
Authors: H Klar Yaggi; John Concato; Walter N Kernan; Judith H Lichtman; Lawrence M Brass; Vahid Mohsenin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peter R Eastwood; Maree Barnes; Jennifer H Walsh; Kathleen J Maddison; Geoffrey Hee; Alan R Schwartz; Philip L Smith; Atul Malhotra; R Douglas McEvoy; John R Wheatley; Fergal J O'Donoghue; Peter D Rochford; Tom Churchward; Matthew C Campbell; Carsten E Palme; Sam Robinson; George S Goding; Danny J Eckert; Amy S Jordan; Peter G Catcheside; Louise Tyler; Nick A Antic; Christopher J Worsnop; Eric J Kezirian; David R Hillman Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Andrew Wellman; Amy S Jordan; Atul Malhotra; Robert B Fogel; Eliot S Katz; Karen Schory; Jill K Edwards; David P White Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-08-18 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jason P Kirkness; Alan R Schwartz; Hartmut Schneider; Naresh M Punjabi; Joseph J Maly; Alison M Laffan; Brian M McGinley; Thomas Magnuson; Michael Schweitzer; Philip L Smith; Susheel P Patil Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2008-04-17
Authors: Cathy A Goldstein; Richard B Berry; David T Kent; David A Kristo; Azizi A Seixas; Susan Redline; M Brandon Westover Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Anna C Bitners; Sanghun Sin; Sabhyata Agrawal; Seonjoo Lee; Jayaram K Udupa; Yubing Tong; David M Wootton; Kok Ren Choy; Mark E Wagshul; Raanan Arens Journal: Sleep Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Diane C Lim; Diego R Mazzotti; Kate Sutherland; Jesse W Mindel; Jinyoung Kim; Peter A Cistulli; Ulysses J Magalang; Allan I Pack; Philip de Chazal; Thomas Penzel Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Simon A Joosten; Bradley A Edwards; Andrew Wellman; Anthony Turton; Elizabeth M Skuza; Philip J Berger; Garun S Hamilton Journal: Sleep Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 5.849