Literature DB >> 32968638

Effectiveness of magnetocardiography to identify patients in need of coronary artery revascularization: a cross-sectional study.

Xiao Huang1, Ning Hua1, Fakuan Tang1, Shulin Zhang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with angina-like symptoms need invasive or non-invasive angiography to determine whether revascularization is necessary. For patients in need of revascularization, undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) may delay the treatment of revascularization and increase exposure to contrast agents and radiation. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to accessed the effectiveness of magnetocardiography (MCG) to identify patients who should undergo coronary revascularization.
METHODS: A total of 203 patients who were suffering from angina-like symptoms and underwent percutaneous coronary angiography (PCA) between July 27, 2015 and April 10, 2017 at the 8th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. In all patients, 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) and MCG test were performed before PCA. For each subject. The value at every single sampling point was extracted from T wave of each MCG channel in time sequence. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated for each two T-waves. A binary logistic regression diagnosis model of these coefficients was established to identify patients in need of revascularization.
RESULTS: Ten pairings of coefficients were entered into diagnostic regression model as covariates. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was 0.747 (95% CI: 0.680-0.815), and the asymptotic P value was less than 0.001. At the cut-off value of 0.55, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were 72.9%, 65.9%, 74.8%, 63.6% and 69.9%, and the positive and negative post-test probabilities were 65.9% and 25.7%. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for 12-lead ECG were 67.0%, 62.7%, 63.5%, 70.5% and 55.1%, respectively. However, when those acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients were ruled out from both groups, the MCG model had an accuracy of 68.2%, a sensitivity of 70.1%, a specificity of 66.3%, a PPV of 68.5% and an NPV of 67.9%. But, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for 12-lead ECG were 60.0%, 55.2%, 65.1%, 62.3% and 58.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients suffering from angina-like symptoms, with a logistic regression model value over 0.55, should be recommended for PCA. 2020 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetocardiography (MCG); coronary artery disease (CAD); diagnosis; percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); revascularization

Year:  2020        PMID: 32968638      PMCID: PMC7487377          DOI: 10.21037/cdt-20-121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  22 in total

1.  Spatial distribution of QT dispersion measured by magnetocardiography under stress in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  B Hailer; P Van Leeuwen; S Lange; M Wehr
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  Changes in dipolar structure of cardiac magnetic field maps after ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Peter Van Leeuwen; Birgit Hailer; Alexander Beck; Gregor Eiling; Dietrich Grönemeyer
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Recent advances in magnetocardiography.

Authors:  Hans Koch
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.438

4.  Visualization of cardiac dipole using a current density map: detection of cardiac current undetectable by electrocardiography using magnetocardiography.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Ikefuji; Masahiro Nomura; Yutaka Nakaya; Toshifumi Mori; Noriyasu Kondo; Kiyoshi Ieishi; Sayuri Fujimoto; Susumu Ito
Journal:  J Med Invest       Date:  2007-02

5.  Magnetocardiography of direct currents: S-T segment and baseline shifts during experimental myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D Cohen; J C Norman; F Molokhia; W Hood
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Magnetic determination of the relationship between the S-T segment shift and the injury current produced by coronary artery occlusion.

Authors:  D Cohen; L A Kaufman
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Usefulness of magnetocardiography to detect coronary artery disease and cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Authors:  Yen-Wen Wu; Chii-Ming Lee; Yen-Bin Liu; Shoei-Shen Wang; Hui-Chun Huang; Wei-Kung Tseng; Hsiang-Yiang Jui; Shan-Ying Wang; Herng-Er Horng; Hong-Chang Yang; Chau-Chung Wu
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.993

8.  Spatial distribution of repolarization times in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Peter Van Leeuwen; Birgit Hailer; Silke Lange; Dietrich Grönemeyer
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 9.  Electrophysiologic basis for arrhythmias in ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  R Lazzara; B J Scherlag
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-02-27       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Dobutamine stress magnetocardiography for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses - a prospective study in comparison with simultaneous 12-lead electrocardiography.

Authors:  J-W Park; B Leithäuser; M Vrsansky; F Jung
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.