Literature DB >> 18503107

Dobutamine stress magnetocardiography for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses - a prospective study in comparison with simultaneous 12-lead electrocardiography.

J-W Park1, B Leithäuser, M Vrsansky, F Jung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exercise electrocardiography is an imperfect test for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). Magnetocardiography detects cardiac electrical disturbances associated with myocardial ischemia. We prospectively investigated the accuracy of high-dose dobutamine stress magnetocardiography (DS-MCG) and simultaneous electrocardiography (DS-ECG) for the detection of significant CAD.
METHODS: 100 patients with an intermediate pre-test probability for CAD underwent DS-MCG using a multichannel magnetometer prior to invasive coronary angiography. Patients were examined at rest and during a standard dobutamine-atropine scheme. Significant reduction of epicardial current strength/density during stress, reconstructed from the magnetic field map and superposed on a virtual heart model indicates myocardial ischemia. A 12-lead DS-ECG was recorded simultaneously. Significant coronary artery stenosis was defined as > or = 70% of lumen reduction.
RESULTS: Without beta-blocker all 100 patients reached the targeted heart rate. The image quality of DS-MCG and DS-ECG was sufficient for analysis in all patients. In 19 patients CAD was ruled out angiographically. Thirty two or seven patients revealed coronary artery stenoses of 30-49% or of 50-69%, respectively. In 42 patients we found significant stenoses of > or = 70%. In 41 of these patients DS-MCG revealed myocardial ischemia. The sensitivity of DS-MCG and DS-ECG for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis was 97.6% and 26.2%, the specificity of DS-MCG and DS-ECG 82.8% and 82.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: DS-MCG can be performed with a standard dobutamine/atropine stress protocol. DS-MCG yields a significantly higher accuracy for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis than DS-ECG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18503107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc        ISSN: 1386-0291            Impact factor:   2.375


  5 in total

1.  Effectiveness of magnetocardiography to identify patients in need of coronary artery revascularization: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Xiao Huang; Ning Hua; Fakuan Tang; Shulin Zhang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-08

Review 2.  Magnetocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rajender Agarwal; Abhimanyu Saini; Tareq Alyousef; Craig A Umscheid
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  QTc Heterogeneity in Rest Magnetocardiography is Sensitive to Detect Coronary Artery Disease: In Comparison with Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

Authors:  Yen-Wen Wu; Lung-Chun Lin; Wei-Kung Tseng; Yen-Bin Liu; Hsian-Li Kao; Mao-Shin Lin; Huei-Chun Huang; Shan-Ying Wang; Herng-Er Horng; Hong-Chang Yang; Chau-Chung Wu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.672

4.  Repolarization Heterogeneity of Magnetocardiography Predicts Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Ae Young Her; Jai Wun Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  A 90-second magnetocardiogram using a novel analysis system to assess for coronary artery stenosis in Emergency department observation unit chest pain patients.

Authors:  Margarita E Pena; Claire L Pearson; Marc P Goulet; Viviane M Kazan; Alexandra L DeRita; Susan M Szpunar; Robert B Dunne
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2020-01-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.