Literature DB >> 32966692

Comparison among research, home, and office blood pressure measurements for pregnant women: The TMM BirThree Cohort Study.

Takuma Usuzaki1, Mami Ishikuro2,3, Hirohito Metoki4, Keiko Murakami2,3, Aoi Noda2,3,5, Fumihiko Ueno2,3, Masahiro Kikuya6, Taku Obara2,3,5, Shinichi Kuriyama2,3,7.   

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) measurements of pregnant women have been collected in offices and at home for previous research. However, it remains uncertain whether there is difference between research BP, defined as BP measured for the purpose of epidemiological research and BP measured at home or in an office. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare research BP with home and unstandardized office BP. Research, home, and office BP were measured among pregnant women who participated in the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study (TMM BirThree Cohort Study). Research BP was measured twice at our research center while the participant was seated and after resting for 1-2 minutes. Research, home, and office BP were compared and agreement among the values was assessed. Differences among research, home, and office BP values and possible factors affecting differences were analyzed. Among 656 pregnant women, the mean (± standard deviations) research systolic (S), diastolic (D) BP, home SBP, home DBP office SBP, and office DBP were 103.8 ± 8.5, 61.8 ± 7.3, 104.4 ± 9.2, 61.2 ± 6.8, 110.5 ± 10.8, and 63.8 ± 8.7mmHg, respectively. Research SBP value was lower than home value (P = .0072; difference between mean research and home BP: -0.61 ± 7.8 mmHg). Research SBP and DBP values were lower than office values (P < .0001 for both SBP and DBP; means ± standard deviations of differences between research and office BP: 6.7 ± 10.1 and 2.0 ± 8.5 mmHg for SBP and DBP, respectively). In conclusion, when research BP is measured under conditions controlled, research BP can give close values to home BP for pregnant women.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure measurements; epidemiology; home blood pressure; office blood pressure; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32966692      PMCID: PMC8029783          DOI: 10.1111/jch.14050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  41 in total

1.  Family history of hypertension, heart disease, and stroke among women who develop hypertension in pregnancy.

Authors:  Roberta B Ness; Nina Markovic; Debra Bass; Gail Harger; James M Roberts
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Pregnancy complications and maternal cardiovascular risk: opportunities for intervention and screening?

Authors:  Naveed Sattar; Ian A Greer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-20

3.  Arterial stiffness is associated with carotid atherosclerosis in hypertensive patients (the Campania Salute Network).

Authors:  Giuseppina Casalnuovo; Eva Gerdts; Giovanni de Simone; Raffaele Izzo; Marina De Marco; Renata Giudice; Bruno Trimarco; Nicola De Luca
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Parity as a factor affecting the white-coat effect in pregnant women: the BOSHI study.

Authors:  Mami Ishikuro; Taku Obara; Hirohito Metoki; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Noriyuki Iwama; Mikiko Katagiri; Hidekazu Nishigori; Yoko Narikawa; Katsuyo Yagihashi; Masahiro Kikuya; Nobuo Yaegashi; Kazuhiko Hoshi; Masakuni Suzuki; Shinichi Kuriyama; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Bryan Williams; Giuseppe Mancia; Wilko Spiering; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Michel Azizi; Michel Burnier; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Giovanni de Simone; Anna Dominiczak; Thomas Kahan; Felix Mahfoud; Josep Redon; Luis Ruilope; Alberto Zanchetti; Mary Kerins; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Reinhold Kreutz; Stephane Laurent; Gregory Y H Lip; Richard McManus; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Frank Ruschitzka; Roland E Schmieder; Evgeny Shlyakhto; Costas Tsioufis; Victor Aboyans; Ileana Desormais
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 6.  The reason why home blood pressure measurements are preferred over clinic or ambulatory blood pressure in Japan.

Authors:  Yutaka Imai; Taku Obara; Kei Asamaya; Takayoshi Ohkubo
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.872

7.  Maternal clinic and home blood pressure measurements during pregnancy and infant birth weight: the BOSHI study.

Authors:  Noriyuki Iwama; Hirohito Metoki; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Mami Ishikuro; Taku Obara; Masahiro Kikuya; Katsuyo Yagihashi; Hidekazu Nishigori; Takashi Sugiyama; Junichi Sugawara; Nobuo Yaegashi; Kazuhiko Hoshi; Masakuni Suzuki; Shinichi Kuriyama; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.872

8.  Prognosis of white-coat and masked hypertension: International Database of HOme blood pressure in relation to Cardiovascular Outcome.

Authors:  George S Stergiou; Kei Asayama; Lutgarde Thijs; Anastasios Kollias; Teemu J Niiranen; Atsushi Hozawa; José Boggia; Jouni K Johansson; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Ichiro Tsuji; Antti M Jula; Yutaka Imai; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 9.  Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Overview and Current Recommendations.

Authors:  Diane M Folk
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Comparison of blood pressure values-self-measured at home, measured at an unattended office, and measured at a conventional attended office.

Authors:  Kei Asayama; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Hiromi Rakugi; Masaaki Miyakawa; Hisao Mori; Tomohiro Katsuya; Yumi Ikehara; Shinichiro Ueda; Yusuke Ohya; Takuya Tsuchihashi; Kazuomi Kario; Katsuyuki Miura; Naoyuki Hasebe; Sadayoshi Ito; Satoshi Umemura
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.872

View more
  3 in total

1.  An interesting link between quality of sleep and a measure of blood pressure variability.

Authors:  Kouichi Tamura; Kotaro Uchida; Tomoaki Ishigami
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Comparison among research, home, and office blood pressure measurements for pregnant women: The TMM BirThree Cohort Study.

Authors:  Takuma Usuzaki; Mami Ishikuro; Hirohito Metoki; Keiko Murakami; Aoi Noda; Fumihiko Ueno; Masahiro Kikuya; Taku Obara; Shinichi Kuriyama
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Home blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karen Tran; Raj Padwal; Nadia Khan; Mary-Doug Wright; Wee Shian Chan
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2021-06-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.