Literature DB >> 26311165

Parity as a factor affecting the white-coat effect in pregnant women: the BOSHI study.

Mami Ishikuro1,2, Taku Obara1,2, Hirohito Metoki2,3, Takayoshi Ohkubo4,5, Noriyuki Iwama3, Mikiko Katagiri3, Hidekazu Nishigori3, Yoko Narikawa1,2, Katsuyo Yagihashi6, Masahiro Kikuya1,2, Nobuo Yaegashi3, Kazuhiko Hoshi6, Masakuni Suzuki6, Shinichi Kuriyama1,2,7, Yutaka Imai5.   

Abstract

Parity has previously been reported to affect the difference in blood pressure (BP) measured in the office and at home, also known as the white-coat effect, during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to identify possible factors that cause the white-coat effect during pregnancy, focusing on parity. In total, 530 pregnant women (31.3±4.7 years old) who delivered at a maternal clinic were eligible for the study. The association between parity and the white-coat effect (clinic BP compared with home BP) was investigated for each trimester of pregnancy by multivariate analysis of covariance adjusted for age, body mass index, family history of hypertension and smoking habits. The magnitudes of the white-coat effect for systolic BP in the first, second and third trimesters were 4.1±9.8, 3.4±7.1 and 1.8±6.0 mm Hg, respectively and those for diastolic BP were 3.8±7.4, 1.6±5.8 and 2.4±4.9 mm Hg, respectively. Parity was significantly and negatively associated with the white-coat effect for systolic BP in the first trimester of pregnancy (nulliparous women: 5.07±0.61 mm Hg and multiparous women: 2.78±0.74 mm Hg, P=0.02) as well as for diastolic BP in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Age, body mass index, family history of hypertension and smoking were not significantly associated with the white-coat effect in any trimester of pregnancy. Parity may have an influence on the white-coat effect in pregnancy; however, the observed effect, on average 1-2 mm Hg, was small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26311165     DOI: 10.1038/hr.2015.97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  27 in total

1.  Maternal body mass index and the risk of preeclampsia: a systematic overview.

Authors:  Tara E O'Brien; Joel G Ray; Wee-Shian Chan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Normal and high-normal blood pressures, but not body mass index, are risk factors for the subsequent occurrence of both preeclampsia and gestational hypertension: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Akihide Ohkuchi; Ryuhiko Iwasaki; Hirotada Suzuki; Chikako Hirashima; Kayo Takahashi; Rie Usui; Shigeki Matsubara; Hisanori Minakami; Mitsuaki Suzuki
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Daily serial hemodynamic data during pregnancy and seasonal variation: the BOSHI study.

Authors:  Hirohito Metoki; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Taku Obara; Konomi Akutsu; Mami Yamamoto; Mami Ishikuro; Kasumi Sakurai; Noriyuki Iwama; Mikiko Katagiri; Junichi Sugawara; Takuo Hirose; Michihiro Sato; Masahiro Kikuya; Katsuyo Yagihashi; Yoichi Matsubara; Nobuo Yaegashi; Shigeru Mori; Masakuni Suzuki; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 1.749

4.  White-coat and masked hypertension are associated with carotid atherosclerosis in a general population: the Hisayama study.

Authors:  Masayo Fukuhara; Hisatomi Arima; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Jun Hata; Yoichiro Hirakawa; Yasufumi Doi; Koji Yonemoto; Naoko Mukai; Masaharu Nagata; Fumie Ikeda; Kiyoshi Matsumura; Takanari Kitazono; Yutaka Kiyohara
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  How common is white coat hypertension?

Authors:  T G Pickering; G D James; C Boddie; G A Harshfield; S Blank; J H Laragh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-01-08       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Central aortic blood pressure and augmentation index during normal pregnancy.

Authors:  Mika Fujime; Takuji Tomimatsu; Yuko Okaue; Shinsuke Koyama; Takeshi Kanagawa; Takeshi Taniguchi; Tadashi Kimura
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.872

7.  Can we use the Omron T9P automated blood pressure monitor in pregnancy?

Authors:  Mark A Brown; Lynne Roberts; Gregory Davis; George Mangos
Journal:  Hypertens Pregnancy       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.108

8.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy induced hypertension.

Authors:  A Biswas; M A Choolani; C Anandakumar; S Arulkumaran
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Predictive factors for masked hypertension within a population of controlled hypertensives.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Mallion; Pierre Clerson; Guillaume Bobrie; Nathalie Genes; Bernard Vaisse; Gilles Chatellier
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: executive summary: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; Nancy Houston Miller; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Lawrence R Krakoff; Nancy T Artinian; David Goff
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 10.190

View more
  7 in total

1.  Accumulation of evidence regarding home blood pressure during pregnancy is necessary.

Authors:  Hirohito Metoki; Michihiro Satoh; Takahisa Murakami
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 2.  Monitoring and evaluation of out-of-office blood pressure during pregnancy.

Authors:  Hirohito Metoki; Noriyuki Iwama; Mami Ishikuro; Michihiro Satoh; Takahisa Murakami; Hidekazu Nishigori
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Association of maternal home blood pressure trajectory during pregnancy with infant birth weight: the BOSHI study.

Authors:  Noriyuki Iwama; Mari S Oba; Michihiro Satoh; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Mami Ishikuro; Taku Obara; Satomi Sasaki; Masatoshi Saito; Yoshitaka Murakami; Shin-Ichi Kuriyama; Nobuo Yaegashi; Kazuhiko Hoshi; Yutaka Imai; Hirohito Metoki
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.872

4.  Maternal parity and perinatal cortisol adaptation: The role of pregnancy-specific distress and implications for postpartum mood.

Authors:  Shannon L Gillespie; Amanda M Mitchell; Jennifer M Kowalsky; Lisa M Christian
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.905

5.  White coat hypertension in early pregnancy in women with pre-existing diabetes: prevalence and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Marianne Vestgaard; Björg Ásbjörnsdóttir; Lene Ringholm; Lise Lotte T Andersen; Dorte M Jensen; Peter Damm; Elisabeth R Mathiesen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 6.  Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: definition, management, and out-of-office blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Hirohito Metoki; Noriyuki Iwama; Hirotaka Hamada; Michihiro Satoh; Takahisa Murakami; Mami Ishikuro; Taku Obara
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 5.528

7.  Comparison among research, home, and office blood pressure measurements for pregnant women: The TMM BirThree Cohort Study.

Authors:  Takuma Usuzaki; Mami Ishikuro; Hirohito Metoki; Keiko Murakami; Aoi Noda; Fumihiko Ueno; Masahiro Kikuya; Taku Obara; Shinichi Kuriyama
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.