Literature DB >> 32964361

Surface Contact Features, Impact Obliquity, and Preimpact Rotational Motion in Concussive Helmet-to-Ground Impacts: Assessment via a New Impact Test Device.

Richard Kent1,2, Jason Forman3, Ann Bailey4, Joseph Cormier4, Gwansik Park4, Jeff Crandall4, Kristy B Arbogast5, Barry Myers6.   

Abstract

This paper reports the development of a test device for replicating unique features of concussion-causing helmet-to-ground impacts. Helmet-to-ground impacts are characterized by an oblique impact velocity vector, preimpact rotational motion of the helmeted head, and an impact into a compliant frictional surface of unknown effective mass. No helmet assessment testing program replicates these impact characteristics, yet they influence brain injury risk and therefore may influence helmet design priorities. To replicate these mechanics, the carriage of a drop tower was modified by the addition of a curvilinear bearing track and a hinged torso-neck fixture to which a helmeted head of a Hybrid III anthropomorphic test device was mounted. Preimpact rotational motion of the head was imparted by forcing a link arm to follow the curvilinear path as the carriage fell under gravity. At impact, the rotating helmeted head struck a vertically mounted surface. The ground impact features of head kinematics are illustrated by comparing rear impacts into a rigid, low-friction surface against those into a compliant frictional surface simulating turf. With the rigid, low-friction surface, the head experienced a change in rotational rate of approximately 40 rad/s, which corresponded to a peak rotational acceleration of approximately αy = - 4000 rad/s2. In contrast, peak rotational acceleration with the compliant frictional surface was approximately αy = - 1000 rad/s2 while the helmet was in contact with the surface. Neck loads were significantly greater with the compliant frictional surface. Translational head acceleration was less sensitive to the surface characteristics, with the peak of the anterior-posterior component essentially unchanged.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American football; Concussion; Ground impact; Helmets; Test devices

Year:  2020        PMID: 32964361     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02621-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  4 in total

1.  Measurement of six degrees of freedom head kinematics in impact conditions employing six accelerometers and three angular rate sensors (6aω configuration).

Authors:  Yun-Seok Kang; Kevin Moorhouse; John H Bolte
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Understanding the influence of perceived fatigue on coordination during endurance running.

Authors:  Joshua P Bailey; Janet S Dufek; Julia Freedman Silvernail; James Navalta; John Mercer
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.832

3.  Biofidelity Evaluation of the THOR and Hybrid III 50th Percentile Male Frontal Impact Anthropomorphic Test Devices.

Authors:  Daniel Parent; Matthew Craig; Kevin Moorhouse
Journal:  Stapp Car Crash J       Date:  2017-11

4.  Development of brain injury criteria (BrIC).

Authors:  Erik G Takhounts; Matthew J Craig; Kevin Moorhouse; Joe McFadden; Vikas Hasija
Journal:  Stapp Car Crash J       Date:  2013-11
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Impact Performance Comparison of Advanced Snow Sport Helmets with Dedicated Rotation-Damping Systems.

Authors:  Gina DiGiacomo; Stanley Tsai; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.934

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.