Literature DB >> 22168739

Measurement of six degrees of freedom head kinematics in impact conditions employing six accelerometers and three angular rate sensors (6aω configuration).

Yun-Seok Kang1, Kevin Moorhouse, John H Bolte.   

Abstract

The ability to measure six degrees of freedom (6 DOF) head kinematics in motor vehicle crash conditions is important for assessing head-neck loads as well as brain injuries. A method for obtaining accurate 6 DOF head kinematics in short duration impact conditions is proposed and validated in this study. The proposed methodology utilizes six accelerometers and three angular rate sensors (6aω configuration) such that an algebraic equation is used to determine angular acceleration with respect to the body-fixed coordinate system, and angular velocity is measured directly rather than numerically integrating the angular acceleration. Head impact tests to validate the method were conducted using the internal nine accelerometer head of the Hybrid III dummy and the proposed 6aω scheme in both low (2.3 m/s) and high (4.0 m/s) speed impact conditions. The 6aω method was compared with a nine accelerometer array sensor package (NAP) as well as a configuration of three accelerometers and three angular rate sensors (3aω), both of which have been commonly used to measure 6 DOF kinematics of the head for assessment of brain and neck injuries. The ability of each of the three methods (6aω, 3aω, and NAP) to accurately measure 6 DOF head kinematics was quantified by calculating the normalized root mean squared deviation (NRMSD), which provides an average percent error over time. Results from the head impact tests indicate that the proposed 6aω scheme is capable of producing angular accelerations and linear accelerations transformed to a remote location that are comparable to that determined from the NAP scheme in both low and high speed impact conditions. The 3aω scheme was found to be unable to provide accurate angular accelerations or linear accelerations transformed to a remote location in the high speed head impact condition due to the required numerical differentiation. Both the 6aω and 3aω schemes were capable of measuring accurate angular displacement while the NAP instrumentation was unable to produce accurate angular displacement due to double numerical integration. The proposed 6aω scheme appears to be capable of measuring accurate 6 DOF kinematics of the head in any severity of impact conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22168739     DOI: 10.1115/1.4005427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  10 in total

1.  Performance Evaluation of a Pre-computed Brain Response Atlas in Dummy Head Impacts.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Calvin Kuo; Lyndia Wu; David B Camarillo; Songbai Ji
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Sequential biomechanics of the human upper thoracic spine and pectoral girdle.

Authors:  Jason A Stammen; Rodney Herriott; Yun-Seok Kang; John Bolte; Rebecca Dupaix
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2012

3.  Surface Contact Features, Impact Obliquity, and Preimpact Rotational Motion in Concussive Helmet-to-Ground Impacts: Assessment via a New Impact Test Device.

Authors:  Richard Kent; Jason Forman; Ann Bailey; Joseph Cormier; Gwansik Park; Jeff Crandall; Kristy B Arbogast; Barry Myers
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Six Degree-of-Freedom Measurements of Human Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Fidel Hernandez; Lyndia C Wu; Michael C Yip; Kaveh Laksari; Andrew R Hoffman; Jaime R Lopez; Gerald A Grant; Svein Kleiven; David B Camarillo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Evaluation of a laboratory model of human head impact biomechanics.

Authors:  Fidel Hernandez; Peter B Shull; David B Camarillo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Consensus Head Acceleration Measurement Practices (CHAMP): Laboratory Validation of Wearable Head Kinematic Devices.

Authors:  Lee Gabler; Declan Patton; Mark Begonia; Ray Daniel; Ahmad Rezaei; Colin Huber; Gunter Siegmund; Tyler Rooks; Lyndia Wu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  An instrumented mouthguard for measuring linear and angular head impact kinematics in American football.

Authors:  David B Camarillo; Pete B Shull; James Mattson; Rebecca Shultz; Daniel Garza
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Development of a Low-Power Instrumented Mouthpiece for Directly Measuring Head Acceleration in American Football.

Authors:  Lee F Gabler; Nathan Z Dau; Gwansik Park; Alex Miles; Kristy B Arbogast; Jeff R Crandall
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Theoretical and Experimental Study of Radial Velocity Generation for Extending Bandwidth of Magnetohydrodynamic Angular Rate Sensor at Low Frequency.

Authors:  Yue Ji; Xingfei Li; Tengfei Wu; Cheng Chen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Non-Linear Device Head Coupling and Temporal Delays in Large Animal Acceleration Models of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Josef M Ling; Declan A Patton; David D Stephenson; Andrew B Dodd; Rebecca J Dodd; Julie G Rannou-Latella; Douglas H Smith; Victoria E Johnson; D Kacy Cullen; Timothy B Meier; Rachel E Kinsler
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 4.219

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.