Literature DB >> 17147979

Detection of classical swine fever vaccine virus in blood and tissue samples of pigs vaccinated either with a conventional C-strain vaccine or a modified live marker vaccine.

Patricia Koenig1, Bernd Hoffmann, Klaus R Depner, Ilona Reimann, Jens P Teifke, Martin Beer.   

Abstract

Attenuated live classical swine fever (CSF) viruses are the most efficacious vaccines against the disease. However, little is known about the distribution and detection of CSF vaccine viruses in the host. We therefore compared the new recombinant attenuated marker vaccine virus CP7_E2alf with the conventional C-strain vaccine concerning virus isolation, antigen-, and genome-detection in different samples within the first 42 days post-vaccination (p.v.). Leukocytes and several organs such as tonsils, lymph nodes, spleen, thymus, parotis and kidney were also tested using highly sensitive real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) techniques. It was demonstrated that vaccine virus could be detected by live animal sampling only in a few leukocytes samples at very low titres and genome copy numbers within the first 14 days after immunisation. Vaccine virus could also be isolated from individual tonsil samples within the first 6 days after vaccine application. In contrast, vaccine virus genomes were consistently detected in the tonsils up to day 42 by real-time RT-PCR. Distribution, amount of virus and viral genome levels were similar for both tested vaccines. In conclusion, blood samples could be the sample material of choice for detecting CSF wild type virus infection even in vaccinated animals after more than 14 days p.v., while tonsil sampling provided appropriate material for long-term detection of both tested CSF vaccine viruses using real-time RT-PCR methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17147979     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.10.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  10 in total

1.  Challenge of pigs with classical swine fever viruses after C-strain vaccination reveals remarkably rapid protection and insights into early immunity.

Authors:  Simon P Graham; Helen E Everett; Felicity J Haines; Helen L Johns; Olubukola A Sosan; Francisco J Salguero; Derek J Clifford; Falko Steinbach; Trevor W Drew; Helen R Crooke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  A decade of research into classical swine fever marker vaccine CP7_E2alf (Suvaxyn® CSF Marker): a review of vaccine properties.

Authors:  Sandra Blome; Kerstin Wernike; Ilona Reimann; Patricia König; Claudia Moß; Martin Beer
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.683

3.  Responsiveness of various reservoir species to oral rabies vaccination correlates with differences in vaccine uptake of mucosa associated lymphoid tissues.

Authors:  Verena Te Kamp; Conrad M Freuling; Ad Vos; Peter Schuster; Christian Kaiser; Steffen Ortmann; Antje Kretzschmar; Sabine Nemitz; Elisa Eggerbauer; Reiner Ulrich; Jan Schinköthe; Tobias Nolden; Thomas Müller; Stefan Finke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Comparative Analysis of the Productivity and Immunogenicity of an Attenuated Classical Swine Fever Vaccine (LOM) and an Attenuated Live Marker Classical Swine Fever Vaccine (Flc-LOM-BErns) from Laboratory to Pig Farm.

Authors:  SeEun Choe; Ki-Sun Kim; Jihye Shin; Sok Song; Gyu-Nam Park; Ra Mi Cha; Sung-Hyun Choi; Byung-Il Jung; Kyung-Won Lee; Bang-Hun Hyun; Bong-Kyun Park; Dong-Jun An
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-13

5.  Differential detection of classical swine fever virus challenge strains in C-strain vaccinated pigs.

Authors:  Helen E Everett; Bentley S Crudgington; Olubukola Sosan-Soulé; Helen R Crooke
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 6.  Controlling of CSFV in European wild boar using oral vaccination: a review.

Authors:  Sophie Rossi; Christoph Staubach; Sandra Blome; Vittorio Guberti; Hans-Hermann Thulke; Ad Vos; Frank Koenen; Marie-Frédérique Le Potier
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Classical Swine Fever-An Updated Review.

Authors:  Sandra Blome; Christoph Staubach; Julia Henke; Jolene Carlson; Martin Beer
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.048

8.  Low CD4/CD8 ratio in classical swine fever postnatal persistent infection generated at 3 weeks after birth.

Authors:  José Alejandro Bohórquez; Miaomiao Wang; Marta Pérez-Simó; Enric Vidal; Rosa Rosell; Llilianne Ganges
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2018-12-09       Impact factor: 5.005

9.  Development of a reverse transcription multiplex real-time PCR for the detection and genotyping of classical swine fever virus.

Authors:  Yu-Liang Huang; Victor Fei Pang; Chu-Hsiang Pan; Tsu-Han Chen; Ming-Hwa Jong; Tien-Shine Huang; Chian-Ren Jeng
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 2.014

10.  Genetically distinct pestiviruses pave the way to improved classical swine fever marker vaccine candidates based on the chimeric pestivirus concept.

Authors:  Alexander Postel; Paul Becher
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.163

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.