Literature DB >> 20160997

Making simple sentences hard: Verb bias effects in simple direct object sentences.

Michael P Wilson1, Susan M Garnsey.   

Abstract

Constraint-based lexical models of language processing assume that readers resolve temporary ambiguities by relying on a variety of cues, including particular knowledge of how verbs combine with nouns. Previous experiments have demonstrated verb bias effects only in structurally complex sentences, and have been criticized on the grounds that such effects could be due to a rapid reanalysis stage in a two-stage modular processing system. In a self-paced reading experiment and an eyetracking experiment, we demonstrate verb bias effects in sentences with simple structures that should require no reanalyis, and thus provide evidence that the combinatorial properties of individual words influence the earliest stages of sentence comprehension.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20160997      PMCID: PMC2756706          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  11 in total

1.  Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension.

Authors:  S M Kennison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

2.  Literal and figurative interpretations are computed in equal time.

Authors:  B McElree; J Nordlie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

3.  Fast priming during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  S C Sereno; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The influence of semantic fit on on-line sentence processing.

Authors:  A R Schmauder; M C Egan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-11

5.  Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.

Authors:  F Ferreira; J M Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Case-marking in the parsing of complement sentences: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  M J Traxler; M J Pickering
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1996-11

Review 7.  Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing.

Authors:  L Frazier
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1995-11

8.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.

Authors:  J C Trueswell; M K Tanenhaus; C Kello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing.

Authors:  L Osterhout; P J Holcomb; D A Swinney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution [corrected].

Authors:  M C MacDonald; N J Pearlmutter; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  15 in total

1.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?

Authors:  Ariel N James; Scott H Fraundorf; Eun-Kyung Lee; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Processing temporary syntactic ambiguity: the effect of contextual bias.

Authors:  Mohamed Taha Mohamed; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Eye-Tracking and Corpus-Based Analyses of Syntax-Semantics Interactions in Complement Coercion.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  Separate streams or probabilistic inference? What the N400 can tell us about the comprehension of events.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Using eye-tracking to study the on-line processing of case-marking information among intermediate L2 learners of German.

Authors:  Carrie N Jackson; Paola E Dussias; Adelina Hristova
Journal:  IRAL Int Rev Appl Linguist Lang Teach       Date:  2012-01-01

6.  The use of context in resolving syntactic ambiguity: Structural and semantic influences.

Authors:  Kathryn Bousquet; Tamara Y Swaab; Debra L Long
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Knowledge and learning of verb biases in amnesia.

Authors:  Rachel Ryskin; Zhenghan Qi; Natalie V Covington; Melissa Duff; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  The hippocampus and the flexible use and processing of language.

Authors:  Melissa C Duff; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Acquiring and Producing Sentences: Whether Learners Use Verb-Specific or Verb-General Information Depends on Cue Validity.

Authors:  Malathi Thothathiri; Michelle G Rattinger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.