Literature DB >> 32940729

Complications following vaginal colpopexy for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse.

C Emi Bretschneider1,2, David Sheyn3,4, Sangeeta Mahajan3,4, Katie Propst5, Beri Ridgeway5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The primary aim of this study was to compare differences in complication rates across different types of vaginal colpopexy using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
METHODS: Patients who underwent intra- or extraperitoneal vaginal colpopexy with or without concurrent hysterectomy were identified in the 2014-2016 NSQIP database using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification system scores, and total operating time were obtained. NSQIP-tracked 30-day codes were used to determine the complication, reoperation, and readmission rates.
RESULTS: A total of 9546 colpopexies were performed during the study period. The mean age was 62 ± 12 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 28 ± 6 kg/m2. The majority of patients were white (73%) with an ASA class of 2 (65%). The overall rate of postoperative complications was 10.5%. The most common complications were urinary tract infections (UTI) (5.1%), transfusion (1.0%), and superficial surgical site infection (0.7%). Excluding UTI, the rate of postoperative complications was 5.4%. After performing multivariable logistic regression, higher ASA class (class 3: aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.16-2.51; class 4: aOR 3.98, 95% CI 1.51, 9.30) and extraperitoneal colpopexy with hysterectomy were independently associated with a higher odds of experiencing a non-UTI postoperative complication (aOR1.43, 95% CI 1.10, 1.84). Minority race was also independently associated with higher odds of experiencing a non-UTI postoperative complication (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15, 1.52).
CONCLUSION: One in ten women undergoing vaginal colpopexy experienced a postoperative complication. Minority race and extraperitoneal colpopexy with concurrent hysterectomy were independently associated with an increased risk of a non-UTI postoperative complication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Prolapse; Vaginal surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32940729     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04521-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  10 in total

Review 1.  Racial and ethnic disparities in benign gynecologic conditions and associated surgeries.

Authors:  Vanessa L Jacoby; Victor Y Fujimoto; Linda C Giudice; Miriam Kuppermann; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Linda Brubaker; Kathryn L Burgio; Holly E Richter; Ingrid Nygaard; Alison C Weidner; Shawn A Menefee; Emily S Lukacz; Peggy Norton; Joseph Schaffer; John N Nguyen; Diane Borello-France; Patricia S Goode; Sharon Jakus-Waldman; Cathie Spino; Lauren Klein Warren; Marie G Gantz; Susan F Meikle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment.

Authors:  John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Management of arterial and venous hemorrhage during sacrospinous ligament fixation: cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Avita K Pahwa; Lily A Arya; Uduak U Andy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. Women: 2010 to 2050.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Andrew F Hundley; Rebekah G Fulton; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women.

Authors:  Ingrid Nygaard; Matthew D Barber; Kathryn L Burgio; Kimberly Kenton; Susan Meikle; Joseph Schaffer; Cathie Spino; William E Whitehead; Jennifer Wu; Debra J Brody
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gouri B Diwadkar; Matthew D Barber; Benjamin Feiner; Christopher Maher; J Eric Jelovsek
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility.

Authors:  Aaron S Fink; Darrell A Campbell; Robert M Mentzer; William G Henderson; Jennifer Daley; Janet Bannister; Kwan Hur; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence and risk factors in a population-based, racially diverse cohort.

Authors:  Guri Rortveit; Jeanette S Brown; David H Thom; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Jennifer M Creasman; Leslee L Subak
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.661

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Predictors of prolonged admission after outpatient female pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Andrea M Simi; Graham C Chapman; Jacqueline Zillioux; Sarah Martin; Emily A Slopnick
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.367

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.