| Literature DB >> 32940379 |
Zhang Wei1, Zhang Bing1, Qian Shaohuan1, Wang Yanran2, Sun Shuo1, Tang Bi1, Zhu Feiyu1,3, Zhang Heng1, Gao Qin4,3, Kang Pinfang1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies have revealed the association between exosomes and cardiovascular diseases. However, the typical changes of plasma miRNAs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are still controversial, the use of exosomal miRNAs to diagnose and predict the prognosis of AF has not been described. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that there were differences in the exosomal miRNAs between AF and normal sinus rhythm (SR) patients, which might be used as the novel biomarkers to reflect the progression of AF.Entities:
Keywords: atrial fibrillation (AF); exosomes; high-throughput sequencing; miRNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32940379 PMCID: PMC7724226 DOI: 10.1002/clc.23461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Cardiol ISSN: 0160-9289 Impact factor: 2.882
Comparison of clinical data of each group of samples
| High‐throughput sequencing group | qPCR validation group | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SR(n = 3) | PaAF(n = 3) | PeAF(n = 3) | F/X2 |
| SR(n = 20) | AF(n = 20) | F/X2 |
| |
| Age(Y) | 65.33 ± 7.02 | 61.33 ± 7.77 | 59 ± 8.72 | 0.50 | .63 | 58.30 ± 10.36 | 55.25 ± 8.52 | 3 | .09 |
| Male | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.9 | .64 | 12 | 10 | 0.40 | .51 |
| BMI(kg/m2) | 27.37 ± 2.22 | 29.20 ± 2.59 | 28.67 ± 2.74 | 0.42 | .68 | 26.91 ± 2.76 | 28.91 ± 2.65 | 0.61 | .44 |
| Hypertension | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2.25 | .33 | 5 | 6 | 0.13 | .72 |
| Stroke | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.25 | .33 | 4 | 3 | 0.17 | .68 |
| Blood biochemical parameters | |||||||||
| WBC109/L | 5 ± 1.46 | 5.91 ± 0.84 | 6.87 ± 1.29 | 1.76 | .25 | 6.02 ± 2 | 6.85 ± 2.76 | 1.13 | .29 |
| PLT 109/L | 186.67 ± 10.07 | 171.33 ± 16.80 | 185 ± 17.09 | 0.94 | .44 | 215.2 ± 46.30 | 220.30 ± 54.59 | 0.32 | .58 |
| D‐di ug/ml | 0.25 ± 0.07 | 0.22 ± 0.46 | 0.14 ± 0.31 | 3.06 | .12 | 0.32 ± 0.26 | 0.24 ± 0.18 | 2.20 | .15 |
| ALT U/L | 23 ± 6.56 | 13.67 ± 2.52 | 15 ± 5.57 | 2.86 | .13 | 27.35 ± 15.04 | 31.85 ± 23.30 | 2.40 | .13 |
| Scr umol/L | 52 ± 13.75 | 63.67 ± 11.37 | 76 ± 5.29 | 3.74 | .08 | 63.90 ± 15.33 | 71.10 ± 19.78 | 0.90 | .35 |
| UA umol/L | 397.76 ± 118.97 | 339 ± 123.60 | 407 ± 181.43 | 0.20 | .83 | 361.10 ± 81.14 | 350.95 ± 82.61 | 0.20 | .66 |
| TG umol/L | 1.94 ± 0.71 | 2.34 ± 1.71 | 3.41 ± 1.32 | 1.01 | .42 | 1.62 ± 0.40 | 2.28 ± 0.79 | 9.72 | <.01 |
| LDLmmol/L | 1.50 ± 0.66 | 2.51 ± 0.28 | 2.95 ± 0.58 | 5.89 | .04 | 2.02 ± 0.60 | 2.21 ± 0.79 | 1.61 | .21 |
| CRPmmol/L | 1.47 ± 0.91 | 1.23 ± 0.64 | 1.07 ± 0.06 | 0.29 | .75 | 1.55 ± 2.81 | 2.06 ± 1.31 | 0.74 | .46 |
| Cardiac ultrasound | |||||||||
| LAAp mm | 34.67 ± 2.52 | 38.33 ± 4.16 | 45.33 ± 3.51 | 7.34 | .02 | 31.10 ± 2.85 | 36.40 ± 5.64 | 5.34 | .03 |
| IVSd mm | 7.67 ± 0.58 | 8.67 ± 0.58 | 9.00 ± 1.00 | 2.60 | .15 | 8.2 ± 1.01 | 8.40 ± 0.88 | 0.58 | .45 |
| LVEF% | 62.67 ± 4.04 | 53.00 ± 2.00 | 57.00 ± 8.38 | 1.12 | .39 | 60.20 ± 3.14 | 55.00 ± 6.37 | 6.15 | .02 |
Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; LAAp, anteroposterior diameter of left atrium; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PaAF, paroxysmal AF group; PeAF, persistent AF group; SR, sinus rhythm; TG, triglyceride.
FIGURE 1A‐C, Western blotting results of exosomal marker proteins in each group. D, The picture of miRNA length distribution 2317, 2323, and 2330 represent randomly selected samples from the SR, PaAF, and PeAF groups, respectively. PaAF, paroxysmal AF group; PeAF, persistent AF group; SR, sinus rhythm
FIGURE 2A, Wayne diagram of differential genes in each comparison group. B, Heat analysis of cluster analysis of differentially expressed miRNAs
FIGURE 3A, Target gene KEGG‐pathway classification chart. B, Enrichment bubble chart. C‐E, Bubble chart of GO enrichment analysis. GO, gene ontology
FIGURE 4The relative expression levels of serum‐derived exosomal miR‐92b‐3p, miR‐1306‐5p, miR‐let‐7b‐3p in patients. AF, atrial fibrillation; SR, sinus rhythm.*P < .005 vs SR group