| Literature DB >> 34926627 |
Chaofeng Chen1, Qingxing Chen1, Kuan Cheng1, Tian Zou1, Yang Pang1, Yunlong Ling1, Ye Xu1, Wenqing Zhu1.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide and has a significant impact on human health and substantial costs. Currently, there is a lack of accurate biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of AF. Moreover, the long-term efficacy of the catheter ablation in the AF is unsatisfactory. Therefore, it is necessary to explore new biomarkers and treatment strategies for the mechanism-based AF. Exosomes are nano-sized biovesicles released by nearly all types of cells. Since the AF would be linked to the changes of the atrial cells and their microenvironment, and the AF would strictly influence the exosomal non-coding RNAs (exo-ncRNAs) expression, which makes them as attractive diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for the AF. Simultaneously, the exo-ncRNAs have been found to play an important role in the mechanisms of the AF and have potential therapeutic prospects. Although the role of the exo-ncRNAs in the AF is being actively investigated, the evidence is still limited. Furthermore, there is a lack of consensus regarding the most appropriate approach for exosome isolation and characterization. In this article, we reviewed the new methodologies available for exosomes biogenesis, isolation, and characterization, and then discussed the mechanism of the AF and various levels and types of exosomes relevant to the AF, with the special emphasis on the exo-ncRNAs in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of the mechanism-based AF.Entities:
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; diagnosis; exosome; non-coding RNAs; treatment
Year: 2021 PMID: 34926627 PMCID: PMC8671698 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.782451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Schematic representation of exosome biogenesis, sorting, and release. The endosome membrane invaginates and sprouts to form intraluminal vesicle (ILV), the early endosome, and then matures to form multivesicular body (MVB) via ESCRT-dependent and ESCRT-independent, the late endosome. Some MVBs reach lysosome and the contents are degraded, others transported to the cell membrane to release exosomes via SNAREs and RabGTPase.
Current available exosomes isolation techniques.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultracentrifugation | (1) The most commonly used method (2) Suitable for large sample capacity | (1) Time-consuming, costly instrumentation (2) Un-efficiently (3) Loss of large amount and damage of exosomes (4) Unsuitable for small amounts of samples or rare samples | It consists of a series of centrifugation cycles of different centrifugal force and duration to separate exosomes. Centrifugation is initially performed at a low speed, followed by ultracentrifugation at 100,000 to 120,000 × g. Finally, the isolated exosomes are resuspended in the appropriate medium. It is suitable for sample such as urine, ascites, and supernatant culture medium | |
| Density gradient centrifugation | (1) Two step method | (1) High purity (2) Structure and function integrity | (1) Low yield and time-consuming (2) Unsuitable for large amounts of sample | The sample is usually layered onto the top of the density gradient medium and subjected to an extended round of ultracentrifugation. The vesicles travel through the gradient until they reach the point at which their density matches the one of the surrounding solution. The separated exosomes are then conveniently recovered by simple fraction collection. The process is suitable for scale analysis of exosomes |
| (2) Single step method | (1) Integrity (2) Higher recovery yield | (1) Unsuitable for large amounts of sample | The conditioned medium containing exosomes was directly loaded on 30% sucrose gradient and centrifuged at 100,000 × g, 4°C for 90 min | |
| (3) Cushion combined with density gradient ultracentrifugation | (1) High purity (2) Preservation properties | (1) Time-consuming | Firstly concentrated by using 60% iodixanol cushion to maximize exosomes recovery. Then, the concentrated exosomes are separated through density gradient ultracentrifugation to remove non-exosomes contaminates | |
| Size-based isolation methods [ultrafiltration, Size exclusion chromatography (SEC)] | (1) Rapid (2) No requiring centrifuge equipment | (1) Isolation of exosomes larger than the pore size of the matrix of the stationary phase used (2) Low yield and the purified sample is diluted (3) Significant hands-on time for column preparation, washing, and equilibration (4) Manual collection of fractions may introduce operator-dependent variability | It uses a stationary phase consisting of resin particles with known porous size. Similarly to density gradient centrifugation, SEC has been shown to allow reduction of contaminant proteins. The process is suitable for small scale analysis of exosomes | |
| Immune-affinity purification | (1) High purity (2) Highly efficient (3) Maintaining exosomes specific morphology, biological activity, and molecular profiles | (1) Multiple steps in sample preparation, making the isolation prone to errors (2) PH value and salt concentration of the buffer might affect the biological activity of exosomes | Magnetic beads are widely used in this method for capturing anti-CD9, anti-CD63, and anti-CD81 antibodies and isolating exosomes | |
| Polymer-based precipitation | (1) Easy, does not require any specialized equipment (2) High recovery rate (3) It is scalable for large sample sizes | (1) It contains lots of contaminating proteins (2) Polymer present in the sample may interfere with the downstream analyses | The sample is mixed with water excluding polymers, that tie up water molecules and force less soluble components out of solution. Generally, the biological fluid is incubated with a precipitation solution and, after incubation, the precipitate containing exosomes is isolated by low speed centrifugation. It is scalable for large sample sizes | |
| Microfluidics based isolation Techniques | (1) Microfluidic based immunoaffinity capture approach (ExoChip) | (1) Highly efficient | (1) Not suitable for large volume, lack of method validation | Microfluidic devices exploit sample-bead interactions and subsequent separation of the beads. The sample is incubated with capture beads off-chip, and only downstream bead separation step takes place on-chip. |
| (2) Microfluidics based membrane filtration approach | (1)Highly efficient and low cost | (1)Not suitable for large volume, lack of method validation | Devices use the micro-fluidics based membrane filtration approach isolating exosomes by their size. | |
| (1) the first such device is a nanoporous membrane with an adjustable pore size that inserted in a microfluidic chip; (2) a multiscale filtration device, which ciliated nanowire-on-micropillar structure that traps specifically sized liposomes (3) a type of microfluidic device based on pillar-array that can sort particles in a continuous flow through nano-deterministic lateral displacement. | ||||
| Commercial kits | The Invitrogen isolation kit could isolate more and a broad size distribution of exosomes from the culture supernatant than the iZON gel-filtration chromatography kit, 101Bio PureExo kit, and affinity-based MagCapure kit. The quantity and quality of RNA isolated from exosomes showed no significant differences among these isolation kits. However, exosomes extracted using the Invitrogen kit appear to contain cytotoxic chemicals, which inhibit cell growth | |||
Current exosomes characterization techniques.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| TEM | High resolution, discriminate exosomes from other similar-size contaminants, immunostaining | Sample preparation may change the morphology of exosomes, potential damage by electron beam | >5 nm |
| NTA | Easy sample preparation, fast analysis, high resolution, vesicles are directly observed | Possible overlaying effect of larger vesicles, fail to distinguish exosomes from other nano-contaminants | 50–1,000 nm |
| AFM | Minimal sample preparation without any destructive procedure | Scan speed, temperature and state of the tip may influent the analysis | >5 nm |
| DLS | High resolution | Fail to distinguish exosomes from other nano-contaminants | >5 nm |
| FACS | Able to identify specific EV subpopulations | Low detection sensitivity for EV | >300 nm |
| SEM | High-resolution imaging | Complex sample preparation | >5 nm |
| TRPS | Information about surface charge of vesicles | Pores may be easily blocked by particles, generate a signal higher than the background noise of the system | >5 nm |
| Exoview platform | Small volume, low purification biases | Expensive instrumentation, time consuming | >5 nm |
| Flow cytometry | Fast analysis | Relate low resolution | Not available |
TEM, transmission electron microscopy; NTA, nanoparticle tracking analysis; AFM, atomic force microscopy; DLS, dynamic light scattering; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; SEM, scanning electron microscopy; TRPS, tunable resistive pulse sensing.
Exo-ncRNAs as potential diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutics approaches in pathogenic mechanism of AF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exo-miR-92b-3p/Exo-miR-1306-5p/Exo-miRlet-7b-3p | Plasma | Diagnostic | These miRNAs and target genes were involved in the process of AF through affecting biological processes such as energy metabolism, lipid metabolism, inflammation, and enzyme activity | ( |
| Exo-miR-483-5p/Exo-miR-142-5p/Exo-miR-223-3p | Plasma | Diagnostic | Some of the pathways are related with myocardial remodeling (PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, adrenergic signaling in cardiomyocytes, focal adhesion, Wnt signaling pathway, calcium signaling pathway) and oxidative stress (MAPK signaling pathway, oxytocin signaling pathway) | ( |
| Exo-miRNA-103a/Exo-miR-107/Exo-miR-320d/Exo-miR-486/Exo-miR-let-7b | Serum | Diagnostic | These miRNAs were involved in atrial function and structure (e.g., gap junction, adherens junction, adrenergic signaling), oxidative stress (e.g., MAPK, AMPK), fibrosis (e.g.,Wnt, hypoxia inducible factor-1), and other pathways | ( |
| Exo-miR-382-3p/Exo-miR-450a-2-3p/Exo-miR-3126-5p | Pericardial fluid | Diagnostic | Implicated in cardiac fibrosis-related pathways, including the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF1), mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), and adrenergic and insulin pathways | ( |
| Exo-Let-7c | MSCs | Treatment | Anti fibrosis, regulating the | ( |
| Exo-miR-17 | CPCs | Treatment | Anti fibrosis, inhibit the TGF-β-induced fibrosis under oxidative stress | ( |
| Exo-miR-19a | MSCs | Treatment | 1) Anti-apoptosis, inhibit oxidative stress-induced apoptosis by targeting three prime untranslated regions in cylindromatosis, subsequently achieving the protective effect. 2) Anti-inflammation, decrease the expression of the inflammatory cytokines, moreover, pro-inflammatory/anti-inflammatory factors were down-regulated/up-regulated. 3) Anti fibrosis, downregulates the expression of the target proteins in CMs, | ( |
| Exo-miR-21 | CPCs/ iPSCs/MSCs | Treatment | 1) Anti-apoptosis, ameliorate the CMs apoptosis, which may relate to the inhibition of | ( |
| Exo-miR-22 | BMMSCs | Treatment | Anti fibrosis and anti-apoptosis, target the | ( |
| Exo-miR-24-3p | MSCs | Treatment | Anti-apoptosis, decrease apoptosis and promote the CMs proliferation | ( |
| Exo-miR-25-3p | BMMSCs | Treatment | 1) Anti-inflammation, inhibit the inflammatory cytokines expression. 2) Anti-apoptosis, inhibit apoptosis by | ( |
| Exo-miR-26a | Muscle | Treatment | Anti fibrosis, blunt the | ( |
| Exo-miR-125b | BMMSCs | Treatment | 1) Anti-apoptosis and 2) anti-inflammation, had the ability of anti-apoptosis and inhibit the inflammatory cytokines expression | ( |
| Exo-miR-126 | CD133+ cells/ CFs/ADSCs | Treatment | 1) Anti fibrosis, reduce | ( |
| Exo-miR-132 | CDCs | Treatment | 1) Angiogenesis, inducing capillary-like tube formation and enhancing the migration and proliferation of HUVEC, through suppressing the expression of the | ( |
| Exo-miR-133a | NA | Treatment | 1) Anti-apoptosis, inhibits apoptosis in myocardial ischemic postconditioning, prevents the expression of | ( |
| Exo-miR-144 | MSCs | Treatment | Anti-apoptosis, target the | ( |
| Exo-miR-146a | ADSCs/DCs/ CDCs | Treatment | 1) Anti fibrosis, down regulating the gene | ( |
| Exo-miR-155 | Macrophage/ECs | Treatment | 1) Anti fibrosis, decrease fibroblast proliferation by inhibiting the | ( |
| Exo-miR-155-5p | Serum | Treatment | 1) Anti fibrosis, enhances the | ( |
| Exo-miR-181a | MSCs | Treatment | Anti-inflammation, create an anti-inflammatory environment and increase the Tregs polarization | ( |
| Exo-miR-185 | BMMSCs | Treatment | Anti-apoptosis and anti-inflammation, had the ability of anti-apoptosis targeting | ( |
| Exo-miR-210 | CPCs/MSCs | Treatment | 1) Anti fibrosis, inhibit the TGF-β-induced fibrosis under oxidative stress. 2) Anti-apoptosis, downregulated its known targets, ephrin A3 and PTP1b, inhibiting apoptosis in cardiomyocytic cells. 3) Angiogenesis, inducing capillary-like tube formation and enhancing the migration through suppressing the expression of the | ( |
| Exo-miR-221 | MSCs | Treatment | Anti-apoptotic by inhibiting the | ( |
| Exo-miR-223 | BMMSCs | Treatment | Anti-inflammation, induce the expression of | ( |
| Exo-miR-320 | CMs | Treatment | Anti fibrosis, negatively affect the proliferation and migration of ECs | ( |
| Exo-miR-320d | ADSCs | Treatment | Anti-apoptosis, negatively regulated | ( |
| Exo-miR-423-3p | CFs | Treatment | Anti-apoptosis, improve the viability of the H2C9 and reduce apoptosis by targeting the | ( |
| Exo-miR-290/Exo-miR-294/Exo-miR-295 | ESCs | Treatment | Anti fibrosis, anti-apoptosis and angiogenesis, increases neovascularization improves cardiomyocyte survival and reduces fibrosis. Enhances cardiac progenitor cell survival and proliferation, as well as cardiac commitment | ( |
| Exo-miR-378/Exo-miR-29a/Exo-miR-29b/Exo-miR-455 | CMs | Treatment | Anti fibrosis, reducing the collagen and | ( |
| Exo-miR-425/Exo-miR-744 | Serum | Treatment | Anti fibrosis, inhibit fibrosis by targeting the f | ( |
| Exo-miR-181b/Exo-miR-182 | CDCs/MSCs | Treatment | Anti-inflammation, reduce | ( |
| Exo-miR-150-5p/Exo-miR-142-3p/Exo-Let-7d | Tregs | Treatment | Anti-inflammation, reduce the immune reactions, and suppress the Th1 proliferation and secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokines | ( |
| Exo-lncRNA Mhrt | ND | Treatment | Anti fibrosis, inhibit cardiac fibrosis and cardiac myocyte hypertrophy | ( |
CMs, cardiomyocytes; ECs, Endothelial cells; CFs, Cardiac fibroblasts; CDCs, cardiosphere derived cells; MSCs, cardiac progenitor cells; ESCs, Embryonic stem cells; ADSCs, adipose-derived stem cells; BMMSCs, bone marrow derived cardiac progenitor cells; CPCs, cardiac progenitor cells; iPSCs, induced pluripotent stem cells. ND, Not Determined.
Current exosomes engineering techniques for Af treatments.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Encapsulate cargoes by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation | Protect drugs from degradation, enhance drugs stability, bioavailability and effect | This protocol can only be used for hydrophobic drugs |
| Encapsulation cargoes through incubation, freeze-thaw cycles, sonication, and extrusion | Allows loading of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs | Causes exosomal bilayer disruption |
| EV-imitating structure (liposomes) | Targeting, stable structure and contents | Physiochemical instability |
| Fusing cardiomyocyte-specific binding peptide to the exosomes (Cardiac homing peptide) | Enhance exosomes targeting | Displays only protein loading |
| Manipulation of the loading mechanism to selectively load cargoes into the exosomes (protein loading in exosomes based on integration of light sensitive reversible proteins interaction module) | Enhance exosomes targeting | Displays only protein loading |
| Transfection of a gene encoding exosome-targeting proteins into parent cells. | Enhance production efficiency, specific packaging, and delivery to target cells | Displays only protein loading |
| Heart patches and hydrogels | Making exosomes release more sustained with higher bioavailability; enhance exosomes effects with better target | The delivery approaches with enhanced retention is unsatisfactory |