Literature DB >> 32939315

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of (aqua-κO)(methanol-κO)[N-(2-oxido-benzyl-idene)threoninato-κ3 O,N,O']copper(II).

Natsuki Katsuumi1, Yuika Onami1, Sayantan Pradhan2, Tomoyuki Haraguchi1, Takashiro Akitsu1.   

Abstract

In the title complex mol-ecule, [n class="Chemical">Cu(C11H11NO4)(CH4O)(H2O)], the Cu atom is coordinated in a distorted square-pyramidal geometry by a tridentate ligand synthesized from l-threonine and salicyl-aldehyde, one methanol mol-ecule and one water mol-ecule. In the crystal, the mol-ecules show intra- and inter-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The Hirshfeld surface analysis indicates that the most important contributions to the packing are H⋯H (49.4%) and H⋯O/O⋯H (31.3%) contacts. © Katsuumi et al. 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld analysis; Schiff base complex; amino acid; copper; crystal structure

Year:  2020        PMID: 32939315      PMCID: PMC7472767          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989020011706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Amino acid Schiff bases, which can be easily synthesized by condensation of primary n class="Chemical">amines with carbonyl components, are organic ligands having an azomethine (>C=N–) group. They play an important and diverse role in coordination chemistry (Qiu et al., 2008 ▸; Li et al., 2010 ▸; Xue et al., 2009 ▸). On the other hand, copper has various oxidation states, of which the +2 oxidation state is the most stable. Copper ions readily form complexes and produce abundant coordination chemistry, while Schiff basecopper(II) complexes are known to increase the catalytic efficiency of redox reactions (Cozzi, 2004 ▸; Roy & Manassero, 2010 ▸). One method of reducing highly toxic CrVI compounds to less toxic CrIII compounds is the use of titanium(IV) oxide, a heterogeneous photocatalyst. Although useful for such redox reactions (Kitano et al., 2007 ▸; Sun et al., 2006 ▸; Tuprakay & Liengcharernsit, 2005 ▸), it is only active under UV illumination (Schneider et al., 2014 ▸). In our laboratory, a heterogeneous n class="Chemical">titanium (IV) oxide photocatalyst was combined with a Schiff baseCuII complex and irradiated with visible light. The presence of a π-conjugated ligand system increases the efficiency (Yoshida et al., 2017 ▸; Nakagame et al., 2019 ▸). It can be said that the Schiff basecopper complex has a photocatalytic effect. In the present study, the title Schiff basecopper complex was synthesized by microwave irradiation in order to shorten the synthesis time and to obtain high purity. The crystal structure is reported here.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound consists of a tridentate ligand synthesized from n class="Chemical">l-threonine and salicyl­aldehyde, one methanol mol­ecule, and one water mol­ecule coordinating to copper (Fig. 1 ▸) in a distorted square-pyramidal coordination geometry. The C8=N1 double-bond distance is 1.286 (5) Å, close to a typical C=N double-bond length for an imine. The Cu1—O2, Cu1—O3 and Cu1—O4 bond lengths are 1.968 (3), 1.937 (3) and 1.910 (3) Å, respectively, which are close to a typical Cu—O single bond length. The Cu1—N1 bond length of 1.922 (3) Å corresponds to the typical Cu—N single-bond length. These four atoms coordinated to Cu1 have similar bond-distance values, and the contribution degree of the electron cloud is almost the same. The Cu1—O6 bond [2.471 (3) Å] has been lengthened by a pseudo Jahn–Teller effect. One intra­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond (O5—H5⋯O6; Table 1 ▸) is observed between the meth­oxy function and the amino acid side chain (Fig. 2 ▸).
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O3—H2⋯O4i 0.87 (7)1.84 (7)2.692 (4)169 (6)
O3—H3⋯O2ii 0.81 (6)1.89 (6)2.687 (4)167 (6)
O5—H5⋯O60.821.972.783 (4)171
O6—H4⋯O1iii 0.821.842.653 (4)175

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

Figure 2

A view of the intra- and inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, shown as dashed lines. [Symmetry codes: (i) x − , −y + , −z + 1; (iv) x − 1, y, z.]

Supra­molecular features

Three inter­molecular O—H⋯O n class="Chemical">hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸ and Fig. 2 ▸) are observed in the crystal; one hydrogen bond (O6—H4⋯O1iii; symmetry code given in Table 1 ▸) forms a chain along the a-axis direction and while the other two hydrogen bonds (O3—H2⋯O4i and O3—H3⋯O2ii; Table 1 ▸) form a hydrogen-bonded O2/Cu1/O3/H2/O4i/Cu1i/O3i/H3i ring with an (8) motif (Table 1 ▸ and Fig. 2 ▸). The mol­ecules are stacked in a double-column along the a-axis direction via these three hydrogen bonds. Hirshfeld surface analysis (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009 ▸; McKinnon et al., 2007 ▸) was performed to better understand the inter­molecular inter­actions and contacts. The O—H⋯O n class="Chemical">hydrogen bonds are indicated by bright-red spots appearing near O1, O2, O4 and water H atoms on the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over d norm and by two sharp spikes of almost the same length in the region 1.6 Å < (d e + d i) < 2.0 Å in the 2D finger plots (Fig. 3 ▸). The contributions to the packing from H⋯H and H⋯O/O⋯H contacts are 49.4 and 31.3%, respectively. The calculated atomic charge on the surface is shown in Fig. 4 ▸. There are negative charge distributions around the O atoms of hydrogen-bond acceptors; this and other features of the inter­molecular inter­actions are in agreement with the electronegativity of atoms in the crystal structure.
Figure 3

Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over d norm (left) and two-dimensional fingerprint plots (right), showing (a) all inter­actions, and delineated into (b) H⋯O/O⋯H and (c) H⋯H contacts. d e and d i represent the distances from a point on the Hirshfeld surface to the nearest atoms outside (external) and inside (inter­nal) the surface, respectively.

Figure 4

Distribution of atomic charges (red: negative, blue: positive) on the Hirshfeld surface.

Database survey

A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.41, update of November 2019; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) for similar structures returned three relevant entries: (2,2′-bi­pyridine-N,N′)[N-(2-oxido-1-naphthyl­idene)threoninato-N,O,O′]n class="Chemical">copper(II) (refcode BIZGIB; Qiu et al., 2008 ▸), di­aqua­(N-salicyl­idene-l-threoninato)copper(II) (SLCDCU; Korhonen & Hämäläinen, 1981 ▸) and {N-[2-(hy­droxy)-3-meth­oxy­benzyl­idene]threo­nin­ato}(1,10-phenanthroline)copper hemihydrate (UQUYUB; Jing et al., 2011 ▸). In the crystal of BIZGIB, a two-dimensional network is formed by a combination of inter­molecular O—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. In the crystal of SLCDCU, two mol­ecules form square planes by two inter­molecular hydrogen bonds. In the crystal of UQUYUB, inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds form a one-dimensional left-handed helical structure running along [001].

Synthesis and crystallization

l-Threonine (0.0234 g, 0.196 mmol) and salicyl­aldehyde (0.0295 g, 0.242 mmol) were dissolved in n class="Chemical">methanol (15 ml), which was treated for 5 min with microwave irradiation at 358 K to yield a transparent yellow ligand solution. To this solution, copper(II) acetate dihydrate (0.0421 g, 0.211 mmol) was added and treated for 5 min while being irradiated with microwaves at 358 K. The solution was placed in the air, and the solvent was removed. The title compound (0.0533 g, 0.169 mmol, yield 85.9%) was obtained as a green solid. IR (KBr, cm−1): 1633 (C=N double bond). A part of the obtained solid was dissolved in a small amount of methanol and left in air, and single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained after several days.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. All C-bound H atoms were placed on geometrically calculated positions (C—H = 0.93–0.98 Å) and were constrained using a riding model with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C) for R 2CH and R 3CH H atoms and 1.5U eq(C) for the methyl H atoms. The O-bound H atoms were located based on a difference-Fourier map. Atoms H4 and H5 of the terminal OH group were constrained using a riding model with O—H = 0.82 Å. H5 was assigned U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(O), while the U iso of H4 (attached to O6 was refined. Atoms H2 and H3 of the water mol­ecule were refined freely.
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Cu(C11H11NO4)(CH4O)(H2O)]
M r 334.80
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)173
a, b, c (Å)7.0614 (4), 11.0738 (6), 17.6541 (10)
V3)1380.49 (13)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)1.61
Crystal size (mm)0.58 × 0.25 × 0.11
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXIII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2017)
T min, T max 0.65, 0.70
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections21250, 3706, 2981
R int 0.078
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.728
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.028, 0.097, 1.33
No. of reflections3706
No. of parameters195
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)1.40, −2.47
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 1080 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter0.013 (6)

Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2017 ▸), SHELXT2014/5 (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2016/6 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020 ▸) and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) General, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989020011706/is5551sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989020011706/is5551Isup3.hkl CCDC reference: 2025511 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Cu(C11H11NO4)(CH4O)(H2O)]Dx = 1.611 Mg m3
Mr = 334.80Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, P212121Cell parameters from 3748 reflections
a = 7.0614 (4) Åθ = 3.5–27.2°
b = 11.0738 (6) ŵ = 1.61 mm1
c = 17.6541 (10) ÅT = 173 K
V = 1380.49 (13) Å3Prism, green
Z = 40.58 × 0.25 × 0.11 mm
F(000) = 692
Bruker APEXIII CCD diffractometer3706 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2981 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 7.3910 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.078
φ and ω scansθmax = 31.2°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2017)h = −10→10
Tmin = 0.65, Tmax = 0.70k = −15→14
21250 measured reflectionsl = −24→24
Refinement on F2H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Least-squares matrix: fullw = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0366P)2 + 0.3357P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
wR(F2) = 0.097Δρmax = 1.40 e Å3
S = 1.33Δρmin = −2.47 e Å3
3706 reflectionsExtinction correction: SHELXL-2016/6 (Sheldrick, 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
195 parametersExtinction coefficient: 0.0061 (19)
0 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 1080 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Hydrogen site location: mixedAbsolute structure parameter: 0.013 (6)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.61538 (6)0.62966 (4)0.57142 (2)0.01921 (15)
N10.5954 (4)0.5019 (3)0.64462 (16)0.0182 (6)
O10.1357 (4)0.6119 (3)0.68853 (17)0.0321 (7)
C10.2945 (5)0.6045 (4)0.6605 (2)0.0213 (8)
O20.3562 (4)0.6679 (3)0.60469 (15)0.0236 (6)
C20.9302 (5)0.4684 (4)0.5454 (2)0.0226 (8)
O30.5999 (5)0.7596 (3)0.49822 (19)0.0312 (7)
H30.681 (8)0.770 (5)0.467 (3)0.030 (14)*
H20.510 (9)0.813 (6)0.497 (4)0.043 (16)*
C31.1020 (7)0.4402 (4)0.5083 (2)0.0305 (9)
H3A1.1438870.4892730.4689090.037*
O40.8381 (4)0.5673 (3)0.52418 (16)0.0238 (6)
C41.2084 (6)0.3414 (5)0.5293 (3)0.0357 (11)
H4A1.3212030.3253880.5040010.043*
C51.1509 (7)0.2654 (4)0.5873 (3)0.0359 (11)
H5A1.2255530.2001810.6017610.043*
O50.5433 (4)0.6871 (3)0.76923 (17)0.0270 (7)
H50.6308510.6940200.7390060.040*
C60.9816 (7)0.2880 (4)0.6233 (3)0.0295 (10)
H6A0.9402050.2358790.6611220.035*
O60.8220 (4)0.7368 (3)0.66221 (19)0.0277 (7)
H40.9146630.6941520.6703410.043 (16)*
C70.8696 (6)0.3893 (3)0.6037 (2)0.0225 (8)
C80.7002 (5)0.4070 (3)0.6473 (2)0.0203 (8)
H7A0.6635500.3453510.6799670.024*
C90.4331 (5)0.5140 (4)0.6951 (2)0.0205 (8)
H8A0.3706340.4355230.7008650.025*
C100.4885 (6)0.5637 (4)0.7740 (2)0.0224 (8)
H10A0.3736830.5611850.8051010.027*
C110.6344 (7)0.4869 (4)0.8141 (2)0.0310 (9)
H11A0.5978990.4035180.8112740.046*
H11B0.6423610.5109860.8662730.046*
H11C0.7555150.4974660.7903460.046*
C120.8794 (7)0.8592 (4)0.6574 (3)0.0387 (10)
H12A0.9909080.8650770.6265170.058*
H12B0.9065690.8892300.7072500.058*
H12C0.7796120.9062560.6351900.058*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0168 (2)0.0205 (2)0.0203 (2)0.00153 (18)0.00096 (18)0.00462 (17)
N10.0179 (14)0.0197 (16)0.0170 (14)0.0001 (13)−0.0011 (13)0.0003 (11)
O10.0178 (12)0.0454 (18)0.0330 (15)0.0048 (13)0.0040 (12)0.0103 (13)
C10.0173 (16)0.025 (2)0.0212 (19)−0.0012 (14)−0.0032 (15)0.0023 (15)
O20.0177 (12)0.0286 (15)0.0246 (14)0.0036 (11)0.0010 (12)0.0074 (11)
C20.0219 (18)0.025 (2)0.0209 (18)0.0039 (15)−0.0024 (15)−0.0038 (15)
O30.0224 (15)0.0358 (17)0.0354 (16)0.0069 (14)0.0069 (15)0.0201 (13)
C30.027 (2)0.037 (2)0.028 (2)0.003 (2)0.006 (2)−0.0015 (16)
O40.0224 (13)0.0229 (14)0.0261 (15)0.0020 (11)0.0049 (12)0.0036 (11)
C40.025 (2)0.046 (3)0.036 (3)0.0113 (19)0.0019 (18)−0.011 (2)
C50.036 (2)0.037 (3)0.034 (2)0.018 (2)−0.006 (2)−0.0042 (19)
O50.0306 (16)0.0244 (16)0.0260 (16)0.0016 (12)0.0025 (13)−0.0043 (12)
C60.036 (2)0.025 (2)0.028 (2)0.0063 (18)−0.0023 (19)0.0003 (17)
O60.0183 (13)0.0266 (16)0.0384 (17)0.0004 (11)−0.0019 (13)−0.0006 (13)
C70.0235 (17)0.022 (2)0.0225 (17)0.0017 (16)−0.0028 (16)−0.0054 (14)
C80.0249 (18)0.0161 (19)0.0198 (18)−0.0005 (14)−0.0011 (15)0.0001 (14)
C90.0175 (16)0.022 (2)0.0219 (18)−0.0005 (13)0.0023 (15)0.0028 (14)
C100.0246 (19)0.023 (2)0.0193 (19)−0.0008 (15)0.0016 (16)0.0007 (15)
C110.039 (2)0.030 (2)0.0239 (19)0.005 (2)−0.0079 (19)0.0002 (16)
C120.042 (2)0.031 (2)0.043 (2)−0.005 (2)0.004 (2)−0.0045 (19)
Cu1—O62.471 (3)C5—H5A0.9300
Cu1—O41.910 (3)O5—C101.423 (5)
Cu1—N11.922 (3)O5—H50.8200
Cu1—O31.937 (3)C6—C71.415 (6)
Cu1—O21.968 (3)C6—H6A0.9300
N1—C81.286 (5)O6—C121.417 (5)
N1—C91.458 (5)O6—H40.8200
O1—C11.228 (5)C7—C81.436 (6)
C1—O21.286 (5)C8—H7A0.9300
C1—C91.528 (5)C9—C101.548 (6)
C2—O41.327 (5)C9—H8A0.9800
C2—C31.414 (6)C10—C111.512 (6)
C2—C71.418 (6)C10—H10A0.9800
O3—H30.81 (6)C11—H11A0.9600
O3—H20.87 (7)C11—H11B0.9600
C3—C41.378 (7)C11—H11C0.9600
C3—H3A0.9300C12—H12A0.9600
C4—C51.387 (7)C12—H12B0.9600
C4—H4A0.9300C12—H12C0.9600
C5—C61.376 (7)
O4—Cu1—N195.03 (13)C7—C6—H6A119.4
O4—Cu1—O391.37 (14)C12—O6—H4109.5
N1—Cu1—O3172.54 (15)C6—C7—C2119.9 (4)
O4—Cu1—O2166.91 (13)C6—C7—C8116.3 (4)
N1—Cu1—O283.64 (13)C2—C7—C8123.8 (4)
O3—Cu1—O289.26 (13)N1—C8—C7124.8 (4)
C8—N1—C9120.3 (3)N1—C8—H7A117.6
C8—N1—Cu1125.8 (3)C7—C8—H7A117.6
C9—N1—Cu1113.6 (2)N1—C9—C1108.7 (3)
O1—C1—O2125.6 (4)N1—C9—C10112.6 (3)
O1—C1—C9117.9 (4)C1—C9—C10106.8 (3)
O2—C1—C9116.6 (3)N1—C9—H8A109.6
C1—O2—Cu1115.3 (2)C1—C9—H8A109.6
O4—C2—C3118.1 (4)C10—C9—H8A109.6
O4—C2—C7124.5 (4)O5—C10—C11112.5 (3)
C3—C2—C7117.4 (4)O5—C10—C9110.9 (3)
Cu1—O3—H3122 (4)C11—C10—C9113.2 (3)
Cu1—O3—H2124 (4)O5—C10—H10A106.6
H3—O3—H2114 (5)C11—C10—H10A106.6
C4—C3—C2121.2 (4)C9—C10—H10A106.6
C4—C3—H3A119.4C10—C11—H11A109.5
C2—C3—H3A119.4C10—C11—H11B109.5
C2—O4—Cu1125.3 (3)H11A—C11—H11B109.5
C3—C4—C5121.4 (4)C10—C11—H11C109.5
C3—C4—H4A119.3H11A—C11—H11C109.5
C5—C4—H4A119.3H11B—C11—H11C109.5
C6—C5—C4119.0 (4)O6—C12—H12A109.5
C6—C5—H5A120.5O6—C12—H12B109.5
C4—C5—H5A120.5H12A—C12—H12B109.5
C10—O5—H5109.5O6—C12—H12C109.5
C5—C6—C7121.1 (4)H12A—C12—H12C109.5
C5—C6—H6A119.4H12B—C12—H12C109.5
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H2···O4i0.87 (7)1.84 (7)2.692 (4)169 (6)
O3—H3···O2ii0.81 (6)1.89 (6)2.687 (4)167 (6)
O5—H5···O60.821.972.783 (4)171
O6—H4···O1iii0.821.842.653 (4)175
  15 in total

1.  Metal-Salen Schiff base complexes in catalysis: practical aspects.

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Cozzi
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Towards quantitative analysis of intermolecular interactions with Hirshfeld surfaces.

Authors:  Joshua J McKinnon; Dylan Jayatilaka; Mark A Spackman
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2007-10-07       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Lifetime and regeneration of immobilized titania for photocatalytic removal of aqueous hexavalent chromium.

Authors:  Seree Tuprakay; Winai Liengcharernsit
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 10.588

4.  Tetranuclear copper(ii)-Schiff-base complexes as active catalysts for oxidation of cyclohexane and toluene.

Authors:  Partha Roy; Mario Manassero
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.390

5.  [N-(3-Meth-oxy-2-oxidobenzyl-idene-κO)threoninato-κO,N](1,10-phenanthroline-κN,N')copper(II) hemihydrate.

Authors:  Buqin Jing; Lianzhi Li; Jianfang Dong; Jinghong Li
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-04-07

6.  {N-[(2-Oxido-1-naphth-yl)methyl-idene]-serinato-κO,N,O'}(1,10-phenanthroline-κN,N')copper(II).

Authors:  Jinghong Li; Zhenghua Guo; Lianzhi Li; Daqi Wang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-04-10

7.  (2,2'-Bipyridine-κN,N')[N-(2-oxido-1-naphthyl-idene)threoninato-κO,N,O]copper(II).

Authors:  Zhanglei Qiu; Lianzhi Li; Yan Liu; Tao Xu; Daqi Wang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-04-30

8.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

9.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

10.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.