Mar Comas1,2, Senda Reguera1, Francisco J Zamora-Camacho1,3, Gregorio Moreno-Rueda1. 1. Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Granada, E-18071, Spain. 2. Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Américo Vespucio 26, Sevilla, E-41092, Spain. 3. Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Abstract
Lifespan is one of the main components of life history. Shorter lifespans can be expected in marginal habitats. However, in the case of ectotherms, lifespan typically increases with altitude, even though temperature-one of the main factors to determine ectotherms' life history-declines with elevation. This pattern can be explained by the fact that a shorter activity time favors survival. In this study, we analyzed how lifespan and other life-history traits of the lizard Psammodromus algirus vary along a 2,200 m elevational gradient in Sierra Nevada (SE Spain). Populations at intermediate altitudes (1,200-1,700 m), corresponding to the optimal habitat for this species, had the shortest lifespans, whereas populations inhabiting marginal habitats (at both low and at high altitudes) lived longest. Therefore, this lizard did not follow the typical pattern of ectotherms, as it also lived longer at the lower limit of its distribution, nor did it show a longer lifespan in areas with optimal habitats. These results might be explained by a complex combination of different gradients along the mountain, namely that activity time decreases with altitude whereas food availability increases. This could explain why lifespan was maximum at both high (limited activity time) and low (limited food availability) altitudes, resulting in similar lifespans in areas with contrasting environmental conditions. Our findings also indicated that reproductive investment and body condition increase with elevation, suggesting that alpine populations are locally adapted.
Lifespan is one of the main components of life history. Shorter lifespans can be expected in marginal habitats. However, in the case of ectotherms, lifespan typically increases with altitude, even though temperature-one of the main factors to determine ectotherms' life history-declines with elevation. This pattern can be explained by the fact that a shorter activity time favors survival. In this study, we analyzed how lifespan and other life-history traits of the lizardPsammodromus algirus vary along a 2,200 m elevational gradient in Sierra Nevada (SE Spain). Populations at intermediate altitudes (1,200-1,700 m), corresponding to the optimal habitat for this species, had the shortest lifespans, whereas populations inhabiting marginal habitats (at both low and at high altitudes) lived longest. Therefore, this lizard did not follow the typical pattern of ectotherms, as it also lived longer at the lower limit of its distribution, nor did it show a longer lifespan in areas with optimal habitats. These results might be explained by a complex combination of different gradients along the mountain, namely that activity time decreases with altitude whereas food availability increases. This could explain why lifespan was maximum at both high (limited activity time) and low (limited food availability) altitudes, resulting in similar lifespans in areas with contrasting environmental conditions. Our findings also indicated that reproductive investment and body condition increase with elevation, suggesting that alpine populations are locally adapted.
The habitat of a particular species may be defined as a set of resources and conditions
needed for survival and reproduction of individuals of that species (Chase and Leibold 2003). Accordingly, the central–marginal
hypothesis states that zones with optimal or near-optimal conditions can be referred to as
core habitats. Nevertheless, as one moves away from the core habitat areas, the environment
usually becomes progressively less suitable for the species, implying lower survival
probability and/or reproductive success, and hence decreased fitness (Pironon et al. 2017). These habitats have border conditions that the
species can tolerate for survival and reproduction and are, therefore, considered suboptimal
or marginal (Kawecki 2008).Core and marginal habitats for a given species can be found along altitudinal gradients.
Mountain environments harbor a high level of ecological heterogeneity because several abiotic
factors change with altitude; mainly, temperature and the partial pressure of oxygen decrease
with altitude, whereas solar radiation increases (Barry
2008). These abiotic factors exert selective pressures on animals and plants, causing
communities to vary along the elevational gradient (e.g., Carothers et al. 2001; Navas
2002; Fu et al. 2007). Hence, a species
inhabiting an elevational gradient may occupy core habitats as well as marginal ones in a
relatively small geographical area. As such, elevational gradients provide researchers with a
natural experimental setting to study how life-history varies according to habitat
quality.One of the main life-history traits is lifespan, which is both influenced by and influences
other life-history traits, as it has a direct effect on several ecological and evolutionary
outcomes (Metcalf and Pavard 2007). Lifespan
primarily depends on extrinsic mortality (Cichoń
1997), but life history theory suggests that it could also be shortened by selection
for greater reproductive investment (Araya-Ajoy et al.
2018). Although lifespan shows a marked geographical variation (Valcu et al. 2014) , we only have a limited understanding of how it
varies with elevation in species distributed across a large range of altitudes and the causes
of this variation. The available studies generally assume lifespan varies linearly with
altitude and provide contradictory results where lifespan lengthens, shortens or remains
relatively unchanged along the altitudinal gradient (e.g., review for birds in Boyle et al. 2016).Furthermore, the elevational pattern in lifespan could differ between ectotherms and
endotherms, because temperature, which is the main abiotic factor to vary with elevation
(Körner 2007), has a more significant effect
on the physiology of ectotherms than that of endotherms (Angilletta 2009). Environments become harsher at high elevations, where storms,
strong winds, and snow are frequent, resulting in low thermal quality and long hibernation
periods. This scenario may bring about early death and, therefore, reduce lifespan (Sears 2005). Most studies on ectotherms, however,
report that lifespan increases with altitude (Zhang and
Lu 2012). This pattern is attributed to several concomitant factors: 1) shorter
activity seasons at high elevations, which reduces metabolic damage and time exposed to
predators; 2) reduced predator pressure with altitude; and 3) changes in life history, as
populations at high elevations often lead a slower pace of life and invest less in
reproduction and more in self-preservation (review in Cabezas-Cartes et al. 2018).In this study, we evaluate how lizard lifespan varies across a wide elevational gradient by
studying the lizardPsammodromus algirus in the Sierra Nevada mountain (SE
Spain). We assumed that habitat quality for this species in Sierra Nevada is maximum at
mid-elevations (1,200–1,700 m) and diminishes as the species ascends or descends the
elevational gradient. This assumption is based on 2 lines of evidence. First, thermal quality
is one of the main factors affecting habitat quality in ectotherms (Angilletta 2009), and for this species in Sierra Nevada it becomes
maximal at intermediate elevations (Zamora-Camacho
et al. 2016). Second, population density is typically lower in marginal habitats than
in core ones (Sagarin et al. 2006) and the
density of this species in Sierra Nevada is highest at mid-elevations (Zamora-Camacho et al. 2013). Different environmental conditions can
lead to a suboptimal habitat and hence, depending on the trait or traits affecting lizardfitness and how they vary with elevation, lifespan may present different elevational patterns.
Accordingly, in this study, we tested competitive hypotheses developed to explain how lifespan
varies with elevation in P. algirus (Table 1).
Table 1.
Summary of the hypotheses used to explain altitudinal lifespan patterns in lizards with
an explanation of each hypothesis and its prediction for our study system
Hypotheses
Assumptions and predictions
Altitudinal pattern predicted
The central–marginal hypothesis
Adult survival decreases with decreased habitat quality
∩-shaped pattern
The resource allocation hypothesis
Animals are selected for greater investment in reproduction in core habitats,
allocating fewer resources to self-preservation and thereby reducing lifespan
U-shaped pattern
The rate-of-living hypothesis
In cold environments, the length of activity seasons for ectotherms is shorter and
reduced activity implies lower metabolic damage, thereby increasing survival and
lifespan
Linear increase
The activity exposition hypothesis
In cold environments, the length of activity seasons for ectotherms is shorter and
reduced activity implies lower exposure to predators, which increases survival
Linear increase
Summary of the hypotheses used to explain altitudinal lifespan patterns in lizards with
an explanation of each hypothesis and its prediction for our study systemThe central–marginal hypothesis: This hypothesis affirms that fitness is lower in low-quality
habitats because adult survival decreases with habitat quality. As such, we expect the maximum
lifespan in the core habitat (mid-elevations), with lifespans being shorter in marginal
habitats situated at both high and low elevations. Adult survival may be shorter at high
elevations due to harsh and extreme climate conditions (Sears 2005). Meanwhile, at the lower limit, interspecific competition is often more
intense (Comas et al. 2014), which can have
negative consequences for adult survival (Dunham
1980). Moreover, at low elevations, predation risk may increase due to the presence
of more and a greater diversity of predators (Fox
et al. 1994), whereas at high elevations it can increase due to greater
conspicuousness since more time is devoted to thermoregulation (Alford and Lutterschmidt 2012).The resource allocation hypothesis: this hypothesis claims that fitness is higher in better
quality habitats because they favor successful reproduction (this is also predicted by the
central–marginal hypothesis). So, animals could be selected for greater investment in
reproduction in core habitats, hence allocating fewer resources to self-preservation and
thereby reducing lifespan (Kirkwood and Rose
1991). For example, Crinia pseudinsignifera frogs invest more in
reproduction when living in more favorable areas, reducing their lifespan with respect to
harsher areas (Reniers et al. 2015). In such
cases, the lifespan would be longer in marginal habitats than in core habitats. The
assumptions made in this hypothesis are supported by studies in other populations of
P. algirus, which suggest that reproductive success is impaired at both
high and low elevations. In highlands, low soil temperatures delay hatching and harm
hatchlings’ body condition (Monasterio et al.
2011), whereas at lower altitudes, hatchling survival is lower as a consequence of
scarcer food availability (Iraeta et al. 2006).
Moreover, predators are typically more abundant in lowland areas and tend to have a greater
impact on juveniles than on adults (Ballinger
1979). In addition, juvenile mortality is very high during hibernation (Civantos and Forsman 2000), which is longer at high
elevations.The rate-of-living hypothesis and the activity-exposition hypothesis: the relevance of
temperature for ectotherms may prevail, as it is the main determinant of lifespan across the
gradient. Indeed, ectotherms frequently show an increased lifespan with altitude and when
inhabiting cold environments in general (Morrison and
Hero 2003; Munch and Salinas 2009;
Zhang and Lu 2012; Scharf et al. 2015; Cabezas-Cartes et al. 2018; Stark et al.
2018). This generalized pattern can be explained by 2 different hypotheses. According
to the rate-of-living hypothesis, in cold environments, ectotherms live through shorter
activity seasons, which reduce metabolic damage and consequently increase survival and
lifespan (Speakman 2005). Supporting this
contention, Bestion et al. (2015) experimentally
showed that increased temperatures in the lizardZootoca vivipara enhances
growth and reproductive investment, resulting in reduced longevity. Furthermore, according to
the activity-exposition hypothesis, reduced activity would also reduce exposure to predators,
and therefore increase survival at high altitudes (Adolph and Porter 1993). Several studies with ectotherms show that longevity
increases for shorter activity seasons (Cvetković
et al. 2009 ; Liao et al. 2016; Cabezas-Cartes et al. 2018), although the exact
mechanism behind this pattern is still not completely known. In our study population, the
length of the activity season decreases with elevation (Zamora-Camacho et al. 2013), and, as an evidence of reduced metabolic damage,
oxidative stress also decreases with elevation (Reguera
et al. 2014a, 2015). In other
P. algirus populations, lizard survival during the activity period was
lower at low altitudes, presumably due to longer activity time (Iraeta et al. 2015).In general, different demographics and life-history traits are expected near the upper and
lower distribution boundaries with respect to the core distribution. Accurate assessments of
lifespan are, therefore, necessary to discern between competing hypotheses concerning the
nature of selective forces driving life-history evolution. Indeed, the 3 hypotheses make
different predictions on how lifespan should vary with elevation in our study system (Table 1): peak at mid-elevations (central–marginal
hypothesis), U-shaped (resource allocation hypothesis), and linear increase (both the
rate-of-living hypothesis and the activity-exposition hypothesis). In this study, we estimate
the age structure (by means of skeletochronology) of a population of P.
algirus across 2,200 m of an elevational gradient. Moreover, to disentangle the
causes of elevational variation in lifespan, we present additional data to test the assumption
that habitat quality is optimal at mid-elevations. Specifically, to differentiate between core
and marginal populations, we test for different proxies of habitat quality (following Hoffmann and Blows 1994): the proportion of
juveniles (which is expected to be higher in optimal habitats), population density, and a
measure of a fitness-related trait such as body condition. Furthermore, given that the
resource allocation hypothesis implies longer lifespans in marginal habitats as a consequence
of life-history trade-offs, this hypothesis also predicts greater reproductive investment
(estimated as relative clutch mass) in core habitats.
Material and Methods
General procedures
The lizardP. algirus is a medium-large lacertid (53–80 mm snout–vent
length [SVL], in our study area) that inhabits shrubby habitats in the Mediterranean
region of south-west Europe and north-west Africa (Salvador 2015). The fieldwork was performed in the Sierra Nevada mountain system
(SE Spain), where P. algirus is found from 200 to 2,600 m above sea level
(hereafter, m asl) (Fernández-Cardenete et al.
2000). We sampled from 6 sites, at 300, 700, 1,200, 1,700, 2,200, and 2,500 m asl
(Figure 1). Lizards were captured by hand
during their activity season in Sierra Nevada, which spans from March to September (Zamora-Camacho et al. 2013). We assessed a total
of 125 individuals over 4 years (sample size per year; 2010: 9, 2011: 39, 2012: 72, and
2013: 5 individuals). We tried to assess equal numbers of each sex at each elevation
(samples sizes of females/males for each altitude: 300, 12/11; 700, 11/8; 1,200, 10/10;
1,700, 11/10; 2,200, 9/10; 2,500, 11/12). Males were distinguished by their wider heads,
larger and more numerous femoral pores in the hind limbs, and orange spots in the corners
of their mouths (Carretero 2002; Iraeta et al. 2011). Because the lizards were
part of a long-term study, they were marked by toe clipping. These toe samples were used
to estimate lizards’ age using phalanx skeletochronology (more details below). Toe
clipping is a marking method frequently used in lizards with limited impact on their
welfare (Perry et al. 2011).
Figure 1.
Location of the Sierra Nevada mountain range in the Iberian Peninsula (top, left
panel) and a 3-dimensional map of Sierra Nevada (lower panel), showing the location of
the sampling sites (1–6 correspond to the sites at 300, 700, 1,200, 1,700, 2,200, and
2,500 m asl, respectively). An image of the lizard P. algirus appears
in the top-right panel.
Location of the Sierra Nevada mountain range in the Iberian Peninsula (top, left
panel) and a 3-dimensional map of Sierra Nevada (lower panel), showing the location of
the sampling sites (1–6 correspond to the sites at 300, 700, 1,200, 1,700, 2,200, and
2,500 m asl, respectively). An image of the lizardP. algirus appears
in the top-right panel.We measured the lizards’ SVL to the nearest 1 mm with a metal ruler and body mass to the
nearest 0.01 g with a digital balance (Model Radwag WTB200). With these data, we estimated
the body condition index (BCI) as the residuals of regressing log mass on log SVL. This is
a widely used index that represents the relative energy reserves of an animal (Schulte-Hostedde et al. 2005). Lizards often
detach their tails as a defensive mechanism. The lack of a complete tail could affect BCI
calculation. However, a multiple regression with individuals possessing a full tail showed
that most of the body mass was explained by SVL (partial correlation
r = 0.85,
r2 = 0.72,
P < 0.001), tail length having a nonsignificant
effect on body mass (partial correlation r = 0.11,
r2 = 0.01,
P = 0.32). Therefore, the presence of individuals with
a partial tail should have a negligible effect on the BCI estimation.In 2010, to quantify lizard relative abundance, we sampled 500-m transects every
2 weeks at each sampling site during the annual activity season.
Censuses were repeated every 2 h from sunrise until sunset. We recorded
the number of active adults and juveniles seen in each transect. Juveniles were
discriminated from adults based on body size and coloration, especially the tail (redder
in juveniles). We assumed lizard detectability to be the same at all sampling stations and
that the number of active individuals counted by this procedure correlated positively with
the real population density (Blomberg and Shine
1996). From these transects, we estimated relative abundance at each site as the
mean number of adults detected. We also estimated the percentage of juveniles and took it
as a birth rate indicator for the population.A subset of gravid females (n = 102) not included in
previous analyses was used to estimate reproductive investment along the elevational
gradient. We recognized gravid females by manual palpation of developing eggs. Gravid
females were transported to a lab and placed in individual terrariums (100 × 20 × 40 cm)
with water (in form of aqueous nutritious gel) and food (Tenebrio molitor
larvae) ad libitum, indirect access to sunlight, and a heat cable at one
end of the cage, switched on 3 h/day (11–14 h) to allow thermoregulation.
The substrate was bare soil from the study area. When females laid eggs, we recorded
clutch mass and estimated relative clutch mass, an indicator of their reproductive
investment (Shine 1980), as a percentage of
female body mass. Females and their offspring were released at the point where the female
had been caught. No lizarddied or suffered permanent injury in this study.
Skeletochronology age estimation
The age of the lizards was determined by phalanx skeletochronology (Comas et al. 2016), which is one of the most accurate age
estimation techniques in animals (Zhao et al.
2019). Ectotherms with indeterminate growth may present a cyclic growth pattern
in hard body structures, corresponding to alternate periods of growth and resting.
Therefore, age can be estimated by examining cyclic growth patterns in bones (Figure 2). Phalanx skeletochronology provides age
estimation by counting annual growth rings in the phalanges (Comas et al. 2016). One toe of each lizard was clipped and
preserved in ethanol 70%, after which the wound was properly disinfected with
chlorhexidine. The toes were decalcified in 3% nitric acid for 3.5 h. Cross-sections
(10 μm) were prepared using a freezing microtome (CM1850 Leica) at the
Centre of Scientific Instrumentation, University of Granada. Cross-sections were stained
with Harris hematoxylin for 20 min, dehydrated through an alcohol chain (70%, 96%, 100%;
5 min each), and washed in xylol for 15 min. They were then fixed with DPX (histology
mounting medium), mounted on slides, and examined for the presence of lines of arrested
growth (LAGs) using a light microscope (Leitz Dialux 20, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar,
Germany) at 400× magnification. We took 10–20 photographs (with a ProgresC3 camera) of
several representative cross-sections for each individual, discarding any cuts with
unclear LAGs. We selected diaphyseal sections where the size of the medullary cavity was
at its minimum and that of the periosteal bone at its maximum (Comas et al. 2016). The number of LAGs detected in the
periosteal bone was counted on 3 separate occasions by the same person (MC) while blinded
to the specimen identification. Each LAG may approach 1 year of life, so the number of
LAGs indicates the lizard’s approximate age with an accuracy of ±1 year (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Life cycle of the lizard P. algirus with the example of a lizard
estimated to be 3 years old.
Life cycle of the lizardP. algirus with the example of a lizard
estimated to be 3 years old.We used the skeletochronological data to estimate adult lifespan, that is, the expected
average longevity of individuals that had reached maturity, by means of Seber’s (1973) formula:
Lifespan = 0.5 + 1/(1 – S), where S is the survival
rate. Survival rate was calculated according to Robson and Chapman’s (1961) formula:
S = T/(R + T – 1),
where S is the finite annual survival rate estimate,
T = N1 + 2 N2 + 3 N3 + 4 N4
and so on to complete age classes, R is ∑Ni,
and Ni is the number of individuals in the age class
i.
Statistical analyses
A chi-square test was used to test for any differences in age structure between sexes or
elevations. Since there were no 5-year-old males, we used 4 age categories to avoid
creating cells with a value of 0: 1, 2, 3, and >3 years (4 and 5 years together). To
examine simultaneously the effect of sex and altitude on age, we used 2 approximations. On
the one hand, we tested whether the lizards’ average age varied with elevation and sex by
using an ANOVA, taking altitude (6 levels, corresponding to the 6 sites sampled), sex (2
levels), and interaction as factors. We also employed a multinomial model with age (4
levels) as the dependent variable, and altitude (6 levels), sex (2 levels), and their
interaction as predictors. To consider possible cohort effects, we repeated the previous
analyses including the year of capture (2011 and 2012) as a factor (years 2010 and 2013
were not included in this analysis because of the small sample size). Analysis of variance
(ANOVA) was also used to test for elevational variation in relative abundance, percentage
of juveniles, BCI, and relative clutch mass. In these analyses, percentage of juveniles
and relative clutch mass were arcsine-transformed (Quinn and Keough 2002). Data were checked for outliers, normality, and
homoscedasticity following Zuur et al.
(2010).
Results
The age structure of the lizards did not differ between sexes
(χ23 = 1.47, P = 0.69; Figure 3A; sample sizes given in the figure).
Nevertheless, females had a maximum lifespan of 5 years and males of 4 years. The lizards
showed a similar frequency of individuals aged 1, 2, and 3 years, but there was a decrease
of almost 50% in the number of lizards reaching the age of 4 years. The age frequency
distribution varied significantly in function of altitude
(χ215 = 36.58, P = 0.001; Figure 3B; sample sizes given in the figure). The
frequency of individuals aged ≥4 years was lower at medium elevations than at low and high
ones (only 1 of the 41 individuals at mid altitudes >3 years old, versus 7/42 at low and
6/42 at high elevations). The annual survival rate was ∼0.70 at each elevation, except at
1,200 m where the rate was 0.60. Similarly, the lifespan was ∼4 years at each elevation,
except at 1,200 m where it was only 3 years (Figure 4).
Figure 3.
(A) Frequency (number of lizards) of female (black bars) and male (white
bars) lizards according to estimated age. Age structure is similar between sexes, but
only females reached the age of 5. (B) Frequency of lizards at each age
class (black: 1 year; gray: 2 years; white: 3 years; dotted: 4 years; hatched: 5 years)
according to elevation.
Figure 4.
Estimated lifespan (gray bars) and survival rate (black line) for P.
algirus lizards according to elevation (m asl).
(A) Frequency (number of lizards) of female (black bars) and male (white
bars) lizards according to estimated age. Age structure is similar between sexes, but
only females reached the age of 5. (B) Frequency of lizards at each age
class (black: 1 year; gray: 2 years; white: 3 years; dotted: 4 years; hatched: 5 years)
according to elevation.Estimated lifespan (gray bars) and survival rate (black line) for P.
algirus lizards according to elevation (m asl).The lizards’ mean age varied with elevation
(F5,113 = 5.89,
P < 0.001;
n = 125), following a U-shaped pattern (Figure 5). Mean age did not differ with sex
(F1,113 = 0.99,
P = 0.32). However, the pattern with altitude differed
slightly between sexes, males having a higher average age than females at 300 m, whereas
females were older than males at all other elevations (interaction sex × altitude,
F5,113 = 3.55,
P = 0.005; Figure 5). The multinomial model gave similar results, with a significant effect
of elevation (χ215 = 40.12,
P = 0.0004) and the interaction sex × altitude
(χ29 = 21.03, P = 0.01) on lizard
age, but no effect of sex (χ23 = 1.81,
P = 0.61). When the analyses were repeated including
year of capture as a factor, the results were qualitatively the same (data not shown for
simplicity), with no significant effect of year or the interactions year × altitude, year ×
sex, and triple interaction. There were no differences in age structure with elevation
between 2011 and 2012 (χ25 = 1.18,
P = 0.95).
Figure 5.
Average age (with 95% confidence interval (CI) , vertical bars) of female (black dots,
solid line) and male (white squares, dashed line) lizards depending on altitude. Sample
size for each category is indicated on the graph, close to the corresponding data
point.
Average age (with 95% confidence interval (CI) , vertical bars) of female (black dots,
solid line) and male (white squares, dashed line) lizards depending on altitude. Sample
size for each category is indicated on the graph, close to the corresponding data
point.The relative abundance of adult lizards varied significantly with elevation
(F5,49 = 5.09,
P < 0.001, n = 55
samplings), presenting a maximum at mid-elevations (1,200 and 1,700 m; Figure 6). The percentage of juveniles detected in transects ranged
between 43.4% at 2,500 m and 74.3% at 2,200 m, but did not differ significantly between
elevations (F5,34 = 0.78,
P = 0.57, n = 40 samplings in
which at least 1 juvenile was detected; Figure 6). Meanwhile, body condition was minimal at 700 m, and improved with
elevation (F5,119 = 3.26,
P = 0.0085, n = 125;
Figure 7). The reproductive investment
registered minimal values at low elevations and followed a tendency to increase with
elevation (F5,96 = 2.43,
P = 0.04, n = 102
gravid females; Figure 8).
Figure 6.
Maximal abundance values registered in transects for adult lizards (black line) and
percentage of juvenile lizards (gray bars) depending on altitude.
Figure 7.
Average body condition (residuals of the body mass regarding the SVL, both
log-transformed) with 95% CI (bars) in function of altitude.
Figure 8.
Average reproductive investment with 95% CI (estimated as relative investment in the
clutch) depending on altitude.
Maximal abundance values registered in transects for adult lizards (black line) and
percentage of juvenile lizards (gray bars) depending on altitude.Average body condition (residuals of the body mass regarding the SVL, both
log-transformed) with 95% CI (bars) in function of altitude.Average reproductive investment with 95% CI (estimated as relative investment in the
clutch) depending on altitude.
Discussion
Our findings (summarized in Table 2) show
that the age structure of the lizardP. algirus in the Sierra Nevada
mountain changes with altitude following a curvilinear pattern: populations at low and high
elevations (presumed to be marginal habitats) harbor older individuals in comparison with
populations at mid-elevations. We discarded a cohort effect because the elevational age
structure did not vary with sampling year and the altitudinal effect remained after
controlling for year of capture. The findings cannot be easily explained through either
nonlinear clines in predators or parasites in our study system. Although we have no accurate
data on predator pressure, anecdotal observations during fieldwork suggest that predator
abundance is lower at high elevations (see also Fox
et al. 1994; Camacho and Avilés
2019). Meanwhile, parasites showed a complex pattern: the prevalence of ectoparasites
(mites) decreased linearly with ascending elevation, whereas hemoparasites increased
linearly (Álvarez-Ruiz et al. 2018).
Consequently, the altitudinal pattern observed in age structure initially appears to support
the resource allocation hypothesis (see Table 1), which postulates that lizards should have a faster pace of life, invest
less in self-preservation and, therefore, present shorter lifespans in core habitats where
reproduction is favored. However, the resource allocation hypothesis relies on the
assumption of higher reproductive investment at mid-elevations, but our data did not support
this prediction, given that reproductive investment, measured as relative clutch mass,
tended to increase with altitude. In fact, the resource allocation hypothesis is based on
the life-history theory, which predicts an inverse relationship (i.e., a trade-off) between
lifespan and reproductive investment (Stearns
1992; Roff 2002). Although such a
trade-off has been evidenced in reptiles in general (Scharf et al. 2015), it is unclear whether it applies to lacertids (Bauwens and Díaz-Uriarte 1997). Therefore, the
observed pattern seems more complex than predicted by the competitive hypotheses presented
in the Introduction, and the longer lifespan in highland and lowland lizards could be due to
different ecological processes.
Table 2.
Summary of results describing altitudinal pattern in this study and in previous studies
performed in the same study system
Variable
Altitudinal pattern
Reference
This study
Mean age
U-shaped pattern
Annual survival
U-shaped pattern
Lifespan
U-shaped pattern
Lizard abundance
∩-shaped pattern
Percentage of juveniles
No altitudinal pattern
Body condition
Increased with altitude
Reproductive investment
Increased with altitude
Previous studies
Thermal quality
∩-shaped pattern
Zamora-Camacho et al. (2016)
Lizard abundance
∩-shaped pattern
Zamora-Camacho et al. (2013)
Activity season length
Decreases with altitude
Zamora-Camacho et al. (2013)
Oxidative stress
Decreases with altitude
Reguera et al. (2014a, 2015)
Ectoparasites (mites)
Decreases with altitude
Álvarez-Ruiz et al. (2018)
Hemoparasites
Increases with altitude
Álvarez-Ruiz et al. (2018)
Dorsal coloration
Darker with altitude
Reguera et al. (2014b)
Body size
Increases with altitude
Zamora-Camacho et al. (2014)
Food availability
Increases with altitude
Moreno-Rueda et al. (2018)
Summary of results describing altitudinal pattern in this study and in previous studies
performed in the same study systemAn initial question is why P. algirus lizards live longer at high
elevations than at intermediate elevations. We assumed that alpine zones constitute marginal
habitats because lizard density and thermal quality were lower than those at the middle
elevations (Zamora-Camacho et al. 2013, 2016). Moreover, P. algirus is a
lacertid typical of North Africa and Mediterranean environments in the Iberian Peninsula
(Carranza et al. 2006), and thus, a priori,
it is presumed to be poorly adapted to alpine habitats (see Monasterio et al. 2011). However, while data presented in this
study support that lizard densities are greater at middle rather than high elevations, other
proxies of habitat quality show a more complex picture: the proportion of juvenile lizards,
as a measurement of population growth, did not differ across elevations, whereas body
condition increased with altitude. This calls into question the assumption that alpine
habitats are suboptimal for P. algirus. In our study population, alpine
lizards show a number of phenotypic traits, well-differentiated from lizards at middle and
low altitudes, such as a darker coloration and larger body size, which appear to be
adaptations to cope with alpine habitats by improving thermoregulation in cold environments
(Reguera et al. 2014b; Zamora-Camacho et al. 2014). These adaptations may mean this
lizard is locally adapted to alpine zones in Sierra Nevada, thus the alpine zone may not be
a suboptimal habitat. Furthermore, food availability is greater at higher elevations in our
study system (Moreno-Rueda et al. 2018). So,
the increased food availability in the alpine zone (Moreno-Rueda et al. 2018), in combination with low oxidative stress (Reguera et al. 2014a, 2015) and activity time (Zamora-Camacho et al. 2013), implies highland lizards could invest more in
reproduction without a cost in the form of reduced lifespan.By contrast, our findings support the idea that lowlands harbor suboptimal habitat for the
lizardP. algirus. In lowlands, thermal quality and food availability were
the lowest, whereas oxidative stress was maximal (Table 2). Consequently, lizard density, body condition, and reproductive
investment were the lowest (Table 2). In fact,
in Mediterranean environments, lowlands show low precipitation and high temperatures during
summer, which can be very restrictive for lizards. Indeed, several studies in Mediterranean
areas report a lower food availability and growth rate in lowland habitats than those at
1,200–1,800 m, which is the midland range in our study area (Iraeta et al. 2006; Ortega
et al. 2015, 2017). However, in spite
of the harmful environmental conditions and the long activity time (Zamora-Camacho et al. 2013), lifespan was not the shortest in the
lowlands. A possible explanation is that the lower food availability would lead to poor body
condition and so too low reproductive investment (see Bronikowski and Arnold 1999), thereby lengthening lifespan and balancing the
negative impact derived from high activity time and oxidative damage (Figure 9).
Figure 9.
Flow chart of the interactions that could explain the elevational variation in lifespan
of the lizard P. algirus. There is a trade-off between lifespan and
reproductive investment. Activity time and oxidative stress decrease with altitude,
whereas food availability increases. Both activity time and oxidative stress have
negative effects on lifespan; activity time increases reproductive investment, which, in
turn, increases oxidative stress. Meanwhile, food availability improves body condition,
which at the same time boosts reproductive investment.
Flow chart of the interactions that could explain the elevational variation in lifespan
of the lizardP. algirus. There is a trade-off between lifespan and
reproductive investment. Activity time and oxidative stress decrease with altitude,
whereas food availability increases. Both activity time and oxidative stress have
negative effects on lifespan; activity time increases reproductive investment, which, in
turn, increases oxidative stress. Meanwhile, food availability improves body condition,
which at the same time boosts reproductive investment.Alternatively, the altitudinal pattern found for age structure could be a consequence of
elevational variation in intraspecific competition. Intraspecific competition may be an
important selective agent (Calsbeek and Cox
2010), and strong intraspecific competition may reduce survival (Balbontín and Møller 2015), at least under certain
circumstances. In fact, P. algirus is a strongly territorial lizard in
which aggressions are frequent (Civantos
2000). Effectively, when density is high, aggressions between lizards may affect
their survival (Le Galliard et al. 2005).
Consistent with this idea, P. algirus lifespan and survival were the lowest
at mid-elevations, where abundance was the highest.Our results also reveal that the lizards had similar survival rates until they were 3 years
old and then survival declined sharply. That is, few lizards reached 4 years old and only 3
females attained the maximum lifespan of 5 years in our study area. The peak of mortality
after 3 years may be a consequence of senescence. Senescence implies a deterioration of
physiological conditions in older individuals, resulting in greater mortality (Massot et al. 2011). In fact, senescence often
implies a deterioration of the immune system (Zamora-Camacho and Comas 2018), which also leads to higher mortality due to
pathogens and parasites. However, senescence is strongly determined by telomere length
(Haussmann and Marchetto 2010) and, in our
study population, telomeres lengthen up to 4 years old, and then shorten (Burraco et al. 2019). Therefore, it is still
unclear why mortality sharply increases when lizards are 4 years old.In conclusion, our findings contrast with most of those published to date on lizards (and
ectotherms in general), which typically report greater longevity at higher altitudes. As
summarized in Figure 9, several factors may
affect lifespan in complex ways. Consequently, a pattern of enhanced longevity with altitude
is not universal and our study highlights some causes that could be responsible for
exceptions to the rule.
Authors: Samuel Pironon; Guillaume Papuga; Jesús Villellas; Amy L Angert; María B García; John D Thompson Journal: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc Date: 2016-11-27