| Literature DB >> 30595980 |
Francisco Javier Zamora-Camacho1,2, Mar Comas3.
Abstract
The effects of age on performance of life-history traits are diverse, but a common outcome is senescence, an irreversible deterioration of physical and physiological capabilities of older individuals. Immune response is potentially bound to senescence. However, little is known about immune response ageing in amphibians. In this work, we test the hypothesis that amphibian early immune response is reduced in older individuals. To this end, we captured adult natterjack toads (Epidalea calamita) and inoculated them with phytohemagglutinin, an innocuous protein that triggers a skin-swelling immune response whose magnitude is directly proportional to the ability of the individual to mount an immune response. We measured early swelling immune response (corresponding to an innate-response stage) hourly, for six hours, and we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) for each individual's time series, as a measure of immune response magnitude incorporating time. We estimated toad age by means of phalanx skeletochronology. Swelling and AUC decreased with age. Therefore, in accordance with our predictions, early immune response seems subject to senescence in these toads. Reduced ability to get over infections due to senescence of immune respose might be-together with a worse functioning of other organs and systems-among the causes of lower survival of older specimens.Entities:
Keywords: Ageing; Amphibian; Epidalea calamita; Global decline; Phytohaemagglutinin
Year: 2018 PMID: 30595980 PMCID: PMC6304268 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Relationship between age and area under the curve of Epidalea calamita toads.
Black figures represent agrosystem toads, and empty figures represent pine grove toads. Circles represent females, and squares represent males.
Models showing the effects of age on hourly sole pad swelling during six hours following inoculations.
In all models, sex and habitat were controlled for. Sex*habitat interactions were non-significant and thus excluded in all cases. F-, β-, and P-values are shown. Significant results are in bold. Sample size was 38 toads.
| 1 | 1.491 | 0.230 | 0.694 | 0.411 | |||
| 2 | 1.628 | −0.237 | 0.211 | 0.252 | 0.619 | 0.241 | 0.627 |
| 3 | 2.448 | −0.286 | 0.127 | 0.278 | 0.601 | 1.926 | 0.174 |
| 4 | 2.288 | −0.226 | 0.140 | ||||
| 5 | 1.920 | −0.251 | 0.175 | 0.197 | 0.660 | 0.312 | 0.580 |
| 6 | 0.151 | 0.700 | 1.764 | 0.193 | |||