Literature DB >> 32938641

Cancers from Novel Pole-Mutant Mouse Models Provide Insights into Polymerase-Mediated Hypermutagenesis and Immune Checkpoint Blockade.

Melissa A Galati1,2,3, Karl P Hodel4,5, Zachary F Pursell4,5, Uri Tabori6,2,3,7, Miki S Gams8,9, Sumedha Sudhaman1,2, Taylor Bridge2,10, Walter J Zahurancik11, Nathan A Ungerleider5, Vivian S Park4,5, Ayse B Ercan1,2, Lazar Joksimovic1,2, Iram Siddiqui12,13, Robert Siddaway2,10, Melissa Edwards1,2, Richard de Borja1, Dana Elshaer1,2, Jiil Chung1,2,3, Victoria J Forster1,2, Nuno M Nunes1,2, Melyssa Aronson14, Xia Wang15, Jagadeesh Ramdas16, Andrea Seeley16, Tomasz Sarosiek17, Gavin P Dunn18, Jonathan N Byrd19, Oz Mordechai20, Carol Durno21, Alberto Martin9, Adam Shlien1,13, Eric Bouffet7, Zucai Suo11,22, James G Jackson4,5, Cynthia E Hawkins2,10,12,13, Cynthia J Guidos8,9.   

Abstract

POLE mutations are a major cause of hypermutant cancers, yet questions remain regarding mechanisms of tumorigenesis, genotype-phenotype correlation, and therapeutic considerations. In this study, we establish mouse models harboring cancer-associated POLE mutations P286R and S459F, which cause rapid albeit distinct time to cancer initiation in vivo, independent of their exonuclease activity. Mouse and human correlates enabled novel stratification of POLE mutations into three groups based on clinical phenotype and mutagenicity. Cancers driven by these mutations displayed striking resemblance to the human ultrahypermutation and specific signatures. Furthermore, Pole-driven cancers exhibited a continuous and stochastic mutagenesis mechanism, resulting in intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity. Checkpoint blockade did not prevent Pole lymphomas, but rather likely promoted lymphomagenesis as observed in humans. These observations provide insights into the carcinogenesis of POLE-driven tumors and valuable information for genetic counseling, surveillance, and immunotherapy for patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Two mouse models of polymerase exonuclease deficiency shed light on mechanisms of mutation accumulation and considerations for immunotherapy.See related commentary by Wisdom and Kirsch p. 5459. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32938641      PMCID: PMC8218238          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  64 in total

Review 1.  Primary, Adaptive, and Acquired Resistance to Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Padmanee Sharma; Siwen Hu-Lieskovan; Jennifer A Wargo; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  DNA Replication-A Matter of Fidelity.

Authors:  Rais A Ganai; Erik Johansson
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  Immune checkpoint targeting in cancer therapy: toward combination strategies with curative potential.

Authors:  Padmanee Sharma; James P Allison
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  High incidence of epithelial cancers in mice deficient for DNA polymerase delta proofreading.

Authors:  Robert E Goldsby; Laura E Hays; Xin Chen; Elise A Olmsted; William B Slayton; Gerry J Spangrude; Bradley D Preston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  DNA polymerases and cancer.

Authors:  Sabine S Lange; Kei-ichi Takata; Richard D Wood
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The major roles of DNA polymerases epsilon and delta at the eukaryotic replication fork are evolutionarily conserved.

Authors:  Izumi Miyabe; Thomas A Kunkel; Antony M Carr
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Functional Analysis of Cancer-Associated DNA Polymerase ε Variants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Stephanie R Barbari; Daniel P Kane; Elizabeth A Moore; Polina V Shcherbakova
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Germline mutations affecting the proofreading domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas.

Authors:  Claire Palles; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Kimberley M Howarth; Enric Domingo; Angela M Jones; Peter Broderick; Zoe Kemp; Sarah L Spain; Estrella Guarino; Estrella Guarino Almeida; Israel Salguero; Amy Sherborne; Daniel Chubb; Luis G Carvajal-Carmona; Yusanne Ma; Kulvinder Kaur; Sara Dobbins; Ella Barclay; Maggie Gorman; Lynn Martin; Michal B Kovac; Sean Humphray; Anneke Lucassen; Christopher C Holmes; David Bentley; Peter Donnelly; Jenny Taylor; Christos Petridis; Rebecca Roylance; Elinor J Sawyer; David J Kerr; Susan Clark; Jonathan Grimes; Stephen E Kearsey; Huw J W Thomas; Gilean McVean; Richard S Houlston; Ian Tomlinson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication.

Authors:  Eve Shinbrot; Erin E Henninger; Nils Weinhold; Kyle R Covington; A Yasemin Göksenin; Nikolaus Schultz; Hsu Chao; HarshaVardhan Doddapaneni; Donna M Muzny; Richard A Gibbs; Chris Sander; Zachary F Pursell; David A Wheeler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  5 in total

1.  Dissecting the Functional Significance of DNA Polymerase Mutations in Cancer.

Authors:  Amy J Wisdom; David G Kirsch
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Mouse model and human patient data reveal critical roles for Pten and p53 in suppressing POLE mutant tumor development.

Authors:  Vivian S Park; Meijuan J S Sun; Wesley D Frey; Leonard G Williams; Karl P Hodel; Juliet D Strauss; Sydney J Wellens; James G Jackson; Zachary F Pursell
Journal:  NAR Cancer       Date:  2022-03-03

Review 3.  DNA Polymerases at the Eukaryotic Replication Fork Thirty Years after: Connection to Cancer.

Authors:  Youri I Pavlov; Anna S Zhuk; Elena I Stepchenkova
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Mutagenic mechanisms of cancer-associated DNA polymerase ϵ alleles.

Authors:  Mareike Herzog; Elisa Alonso-Perez; Israel Salguero; Jonas Warringer; David J Adams; Stephen P Jackson; Fabio Puddu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Enhanced polymerase activity permits efficient synthesis by cancer-associated DNA polymerase ϵ variants at low dNTP levels.

Authors:  Stephanie R Barbari; Annette K Beach; Joel G Markgren; Vimal Parkash; Elizabeth A Moore; Erik Johansson; Polina V Shcherbakova
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 19.160

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.