Literature DB >> 35252866

Mouse model and human patient data reveal critical roles for Pten and p53 in suppressing POLE mutant tumor development.

Vivian S Park1, Meijuan J S Sun1, Wesley D Frey1, Leonard G Williams1, Karl P Hodel1, Juliet D Strauss1, Sydney J Wellens1, James G Jackson1, Zachary F Pursell1.   

Abstract

Mutations in the exonuclease domain of POLE are associated with tumors harboring very high mutation burdens. The mechanisms linking this significant mutation accumulation and tumor development remain poorly understood. Pole +/P286R;Trp53 +/- mice showed accelerated cancer mortality compared to Pole +/P286R;Trp53 +/+ mice. Cells from Pole +/P286R mice showed increased p53 activation, and subsequent loss of p53 permitted rapid growth, implicating canonical p53 loss of heterozygosity in POLE mutant tumor growth. However, p53 status had no effect on tumor mutation burden or single base substitution signatures in POLE mutant tumors from mice or humans. Pten has important roles in maintaining genome stability. We find that PTEN mutations are highly enriched in human POLE mutant tumors, including many in POLE signature contexts. One such signature mutation, PTEN-F341V, was previously shown in a mouse model to specifically decrease nuclear Pten and lead to increased DNA damage. We found tumors in Pole +/P286R mice that spontaneously acquired PtenF341V mutations and were associated with significantly reduced nuclear Pten and elevated DNA damage. Re-analysis of human TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) data showed that all PTEN-F341V mutations occurred in tumors with mutations in POLE. Taken together with recent published work, our results support the idea that development of POLE mutant tumors may involve disabling surveillance of nuclear DNA damage in addition to POLE-mediated hypermutagenesis.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of NAR Cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35252866      PMCID: PMC8892059          DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcac004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NAR Cancer        ISSN: 2632-8674


  53 in total

1.  Structural mutation analysis of PTEN and its genotype-phenotype correlations in endometriosis and cancer.

Authors:  Iris N Smith; James M Briggs
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-08-13

2.  The interaction between cytosine methylation and processes of DNA replication and repair shape the mutational landscape of cancer genomes.

Authors:  Rebecca C Poulos; Jake Olivier; Jason W H Wong
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  POLE proofreading defects: Contributions to mutagenesis and cancer.

Authors:  Vivian S Park; Zachary F Pursell
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-02-16

4.  Crystal structure of the PTEN tumor suppressor: implications for its phosphoinositide phosphatase activity and membrane association.

Authors:  J O Lee; H Yang; M M Georgescu; A Di Cristofano; T Maehama; Y Shi; J E Dixon; P Pandolfi; N P Pavletich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-10-29       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Dominant-negative mutations of the tumor suppressor p53 relating to early onset of glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  M Marutani; H Tonoki; M Tada; M Takahashi; H Kashiwazaki; Y Hida; J Hamada; M Asaka; T Moriuchi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  A PoleP286R mouse model of endometrial cancer recapitulates high mutational burden and immunotherapy response.

Authors:  Hao-Dong Li; Changzheng Lu; He Zhang; Qing Hu; Junqiu Zhang; Ileana C Cuevas; Subhransu S Sahoo; Mitzi Aguilar; Elizabeth G Maurais; Shanrong Zhang; Xiaojing Wang; Esra A Akbay; Guo-Min Li; Bo Li; Prasad Koduru; Peter Ly; Yang-Xin Fu; Diego H Castrillon
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-07-23

7.  Comprehensive Analysis of Hypermutation in Human Cancer.

Authors:  Brittany B Campbell; Nicholas Light; David Fabrizio; Matthew Zatzman; Fabio Fuligni; Richard de Borja; Scott Davidson; Melissa Edwards; Julia A Elvin; Karl P Hodel; Walter J Zahurancik; Zucai Suo; Tatiana Lipman; Katharina Wimmer; Christian P Kratz; Daniel C Bowers; Theodore W Laetsch; Gavin P Dunn; Tanner M Johanns; Matthew R Grimmer; Ivan V Smirnov; Valérie Larouche; David Samuel; Annika Bronsema; Michael Osborn; Duncan Stearns; Pichai Raman; Kristina A Cole; Phillip B Storm; Michal Yalon; Enrico Opocher; Gary Mason; Gregory A Thomas; Magnus Sabel; Ben George; David S Ziegler; Scott Lindhorst; Vanan Magimairajan Issai; Shlomi Constantini; Helen Toledano; Ronit Elhasid; Roula Farah; Rina Dvir; Peter Dirks; Annie Huang; Melissa A Galati; Jiil Chung; Vijay Ramaswamy; Meredith S Irwin; Melyssa Aronson; Carol Durno; Michael D Taylor; Gideon Rechavi; John M Maris; Eric Bouffet; Cynthia Hawkins; Joseph F Costello; M Stephen Meyn; Zachary F Pursell; David Malkin; Uri Tabori; Adam Shlien
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Emerging therapeutic targets in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Konstantin J Dedes; Daniel Wetterskog; Alan Ashworth; Stan B Kaye; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Polε Instability Drives Replication Stress, Abnormal Development, and Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Roberto Bellelli; Valerie Borel; Clare Logan; Jennifer Svendsen; Danielle E Cox; Emma Nye; Kay Metcalfe; Susan M O'Connell; Gordon Stamp; Helen R Flynn; Ambrosius P Snijders; François Lassailly; Andrew Jackson; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Mutational processes of distinct POLE exonuclease domain mutants drive an enrichment of a specific TP53 mutation in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hu Fang; Jayne A Barbour; Rebecca C Poulos; Riku Katainen; Lauri A Aaltonen; Jason W H Wong
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.