| Literature DB >> 32938003 |
Patrizia Guidi1, Margherita Bernardeschi1, Mara Palumbo1, Massimo Genovese2, Vittoria Scarcelli1, Andrea Fiorati3, Laura Riva3, Carlo Punta3, Ilaria Corsi4, Giada Frenzilli1.
Abstract
The contamination of freshwaters by heavy metals represents a great problem, posing a threat for human and environmental health. Cadmium is classified as carcinogen to humans and its mechanism of carcinogenicity includes genotoxic events. In this study a recently developed eco-friendly cellulose-based nanosponge (CNS) was investigated as a candidate in freshwater nano-remediation process. For this purpose, CdCl2 (0.05 mg L-1) contaminated artificial freshwater (AFW) was treated with CNS (1.25 g L-1 for 2 h), and cellular responses were analyzed before and after CNS treatment in Dreissena polymorpha hemocytes. A control group (AFW) and a negative control group (CNS in AFW) were also tested. DNA primary damage was evaluated by Comet assay while chromosomal damage and cell proliferation were assessed by Cytome assay. AFW exposed to CNS did not cause any genotoxic effect in zebra mussel hemocytes. Moreover, DNA damage and cell proliferation induced by Cd(II) turned down to control level after 2 days when CNS were used. A reduction of Cd(II)-induced micronuclei and nuclear abnormalities was also observed. CNS was thus found to be a safe and effective candidate in cadmium remediation process being efficient in metal sequestering, restoring cellular damage exerted by Cd(II) exposure, without altering cellular physiological activity.Entities:
Keywords: DNA damage; cadmium; cellular proliferation; micronucleus; nanoremediation; nuclear morphology alteration; polysaccharide-based nanosponge; zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha)
Year: 2020 PMID: 32938003 PMCID: PMC7558755 DOI: 10.3390/nano10091837
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic representation of synthetic and morphological aspects of cellulose-based nanosponge (CNS).
Figure 2Hemocyte nuclear abnormalities in D. polymorpha. (A) Mononucleated healthy cell; (B) hemocyte displaying a micronuclei (MN); (C) hemocyte with a nuclear bleb (BL); (D) hemocyte with a nuclear bud (NBUD); (E) Binucleated (BN) hemocyte with nuclear bridges (NPB); (F) BN with a MN; (G) vacuolated cell; (H) apoptotic cell.
Cd(II) concentration (mg L−1) measured by plasma spectroscopy in treatment waters after 48 h of exposure to the following experimental groups: artificial freshwater (AFW) (control); Cd(II) (0.05 mg L−1 of CdCl2 in AFW); Cd-t CNS (CdCl2 0.05 mg L−1 contaminated AFW treated with CNS); CNS (AFW treated with only CNS).
| Experimental Group | Cd(II) mg L−1 |
|---|---|
| AFW | <0.001 |
| CNS | <0.001 |
| Cd(II) | 0.0537 ± 0.005 |
| Cd-t CNS | 0.0060 ± 0.0001 |
Figure 3DNA primary damage (% tail DNA) in zebra mussel hemocytes after 48 h of exposure to the following experimental groups: AFW (control); Cd(II) (0.05 mg L−1 of CdCl2 in AFW); Cd-t CNS (CdCl2 0.05 mg L−1 contaminated AFW treated with CNS); CNS (AFW treated with only CNS). Results are shown as mean ± SE. (*) indicates significant differences respect to the control group (AFW) (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Frequency (‰) of binucleated cells (BN) in zebra mussel hemocytes after 48 h of exposure to the following experimental groups: AFW (control); Cd(II) (0.05 mg L−1 of CdCl2 in AFW); Cd-t CNS (CdCl2 0.05 mg L−1 contaminated AFW treated with CNS); CNS (AFW treated with only CNS). Results are shown as mean ± SE. (*) indicates significant differences respect to the control group (AFW) (p < 0.05).
Figure 5(A) Frequencies (‰) of micronuclei (MN) and (B) total nuclear abnormalities (NA) in zebra mussel hemocytes after 48 h of exposure to the following experimental groups: AFW (control); Cd(II) (0.05 mg L−1 of CdCl2 in AFW); Cd-t CNS (CdCl2 0.05 mg L−1 contaminated AFW treated with CNS); CNS (AFW treated with only CNS). Results are shown as mean ± SE. (*) indicates significant differences respect to the control group (AFW) (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Relationship between MN and NA frequencies in zebra mussels from the different experimental conditions (control, Cd(II), Cd-t CNS, CNS). r = 0.52; R2 = 27.17; p < 0.001. Black line is the regression line, which represents the regression equation. Gray lines represent 95% of the confidence interval.