| Literature DB >> 35160922 |
Martina Lippi1, Laura Riva1, Manfredi Caruso1, Carlo Punta1.
Abstract
The control of airborne contaminants is of great interest in improving air quality, which has deteriorated more and more in recent years due to strong industrial growth. In the last decades, cellulose has been largely proposed as suitable feedstock to build up eco-friendly materials for a wide range of applications. Herein, the issue regarding the use of cellulose to develop air-filtering systems is addressed. The review covers different cellulose-based solutions, ranging from aerogels and foams to membranes and films, and to composites, considering either particulate filtration (PM10, PM2.5, and PM0.3) or gas and water permeation. The proposed solutions were evaluated on the bases of their quality factor (QF), whose high value (at least of 0.01 Pa-1 referred to commercial HEPA (high-efficiency particulate air) filters) guarantees the best compromise between high filtration efficiency (>99%) and low pressure drop (<1 kPa/g). To face this aspect, we first analyzed the different morphological aspects which can improve the final filtration performance, outlining the importance on using nanofibers not only to increase surface area and to modulate porosity in final solutions, but also as reinforcement of filters made of different materials. Besides the description of technological approaches to improve the mechanical filtration, selected examples show the importance of the chemical interaction, promoted by the introduction of active functional groups on cellulose (nano)fibers backbone, to improve filtration efficiency without reducing filter porosity.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose; cellulose-based systems; cellulose-reinforced systems; chemical filters; filtering systems; mechanical filters; nanocellulose; ultrafiltration
Year: 2022 PMID: 35160922 PMCID: PMC8839425 DOI: 10.3390/ma15030976
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Cycle of pollution from the emission to the impact on people and environment.
Figure 2Characterization of particulate matter (PM) based on size. RBC = Red blood cell.
Figure 3Different filtering systems obtainable from cellulose, discussed in detail in Section 3.1 and Section 3.2.
Schematic summary of cellulose and nanocellulose-based materials and cellulose and nanocellulose-reinforced materials used as air filtering media.
| Main Component of the Filtration System | Additional Component of the Filtration System | Type of | Filtration Mechanism | Pollutant Targets | Performance Parameters Investigated | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulose | Glutaraldehyde and trimethylchlorosilane | Aerogel | Mechanical and chemical | Oil, organic solvents, lampblack | Sorption capacity, ∆ | [ |
| TOCNF | - | Aerogel | Mechanical | PM10 dust | ∆ | [ |
| TOCNF | - | Aerogel | Mechanical | Particles (0.125–0.250 μm) | ∆ | [ |
| Cellulose | Surfactants | Aerogel | Mechanical | Air atmosphere | δ, % porosity, BET, permeability constant (K, µm2) | [ |
| Wet-beaten softwood and hardwood kraft Pulp | - | Aerogel | Mechanical | NaCl aerosol particles (size 50–500 nm) | ∆ | [ |
| Kraft- or sulfite-pulp CNF | A-PAM | Aerogel | Mechanical | NaCl aerosol particles | ∆ | [ |
| Cellulose | Activated carbon | Aerogel | Mechanical and chemical | Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene, dust | BET, Adsorption isotherm | [ |
| TOCNF | - | Film | Mechanical | O2 | Young’s modulus | [ |
| TOCN-COONa and TOCN-COOH | - | Film | Mechanical | O2, H2, N2, CO2 | Tensile strength, thickness, ∆ | [ |
| Bacterial cellulose | Magnetite nanoparticles | Membrane | Mechanical | Isopropanol, n-hexane | Equilibrium (saturation) adsorption capacity, qi∞ | [ |
| Alkali/urea regenerated cellulose | Alkyl ketene dimer | Film | Mechanical | O2 | Oxygen permeability, tensile strength, Young’s modulus, work of fracture | [ |
| Self-fibrillating cellulose Fibers | - | Paper | Mechanical | O2 | Young’s modulus, strain at break, optical transmittance | [ |
| Softwood bleached kraft pulp | - | Paper | Mechanical | PM0.3 | ∆ | [ |
| NBSK, NLF, and CTMP cellulose | VB and HW | Foams paper | Mechanical | NaCl aerosol particles | ∆ | [ |
| PLA-filter | TOCNF | Membrane | Mechanical | O2 | Tensile strength, Young’s modulus, elongation, thermal expansion | [ |
| PET-filter | TOCN-COONa and TOCN-COOH | Film | Mechanical | H2, N2, CO2 | Tensile strength, thickness, ∆ | [ |
| CNF | HKUST-1 (MOF) | Membrane | Mechanical and chemical | PM2.5 and formaldehyde | η, air flow rate | [ |
| Cellulose | ZIF-8 | Paper | Mechanical | PM0.3 | ∆ | [ |
| TOC | MTM nanoplatelets | Film | Mechanical | O2 | Young’s modulus, tensile strength, elongation, ∆ | [ |
| Cellulose acetate | - | Electrospun filter | Mechanical | Diethyl hexyl sebacate aerosol particles, NaCl aerosol particles | Fiber diameters, thickness, solidity, ∆ | [ |
| Cellulose acetate | Adamantane | Membrane | Mechanical | O2, N2, CH4, CO and CO2 | Permeability coefficient, diffusion coefficient, solubility coefficient | [ |
| Cellulose acetate | Nanoporous silicate | Membrane | Mechanical | CO2, CH4 | Thickness, ∆ | [ |
| Cellulose acetate | Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MMMs) | Membrane | Mechanical | O2, N2, CO2, CH4, He | ∆ | [ |
| Cellulose acetate | Polyacrylonitrile | Electrospun filter | Mechanical | Toluene | Total pores volume, specific surface area, average pores diameters, breakthrough time and capacity | [ |
| Cellulose acetate | Branched polyethylenimine | - | Mechanical and chemical | - | - | [ |
Figure 4Summary depiction of the ideal characteristics that provide good filtering properties to a system, and of the general methodologies to achieve these features.
Figure 5Representation of reinforced systems in which gas permeability is modified by the addition of nanocellulose.
Figure 6Representation of combined systems in which filtration efficiency is enhanced by the combination of the properties of nanocellulose and MOFs.