Literature DB >> 32934390

Let External Stakeholders Be Your Guide to Curricular Revision.

Andrea L Porter1,2, Edward C Portillo1, Casey E Gallimore1, Joseph A Zorek3, Susanne G Barnett1.   

Abstract

Schools and colleges of pharmacy undertake curriculum revisions for a variety of reasons ranging from the reactionary (eg, responding to changes in practice patterns, accreditation standards) to the proactive (eg, striving for innovation and excellence). Continuous quality improvement processes and published curriculum models, both described in this commentary, should be used to guide revision processes. Equally important is engaging the expertise of external stakeholders. While there may be challenges to incorporating external stakeholders in a curriculum revision process, their perspectives and knowledge can contribute to a more robust result, often in unexpectedly positive ways. Logic modeling is one mechanism to structure this approach, maximize the utility of external stakeholders, and strengthen the overall curriculum revision process. Regardless of the size of the revision, a good rule of thumb is to engage external stakeholders at the outset and to let their expertise be your guide.
© 2020 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.

Keywords:  continuous quality improvement; curriculum revision; logic model; stakeholders

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32934390      PMCID: PMC7473222          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe8021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  5 in total

1.  A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Paul Meissner; Jo Anne Grunbaum; Newell McElwee; Jeanne-Marie Guise; John Santa; Patrick H Conway; Denise Daudelin; Elaine H Morrato; Laurel K Leslie
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Continuous quality improvement in an accreditation system for undergraduate medical education: Benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Barbara Barzansky; Dan Hunt; Geneviève Moineau; Ducksun Ahn; Chi-Wan Lai; Holly Humphrey; Linda Peterson
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Development and Application of a Stepwise Assessment Process for Rational Redesign of Sequential Skills-Based Courses.

Authors:  Casey E Gallimore; Andrea L Porter; Susanne G Barnett
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Stakeholders' Perspectives on Quality Assurance of Pharmacy Education in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Authors:  Dalia Bajis; Rebekah Moles; Dip Hosp; Betty Chaar
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Using a Logic Model to Direct Backward Design of Curriculum.

Authors:  Aria Mia Loberti; Bryan M Dewsbury
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2018-12-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.