Barbara Barzansky1, Dan Hunt2, Geneviève Moineau3, Ducksun Ahn4, Chi-Wan Lai5, Holly Humphrey6, Linda Peterson7. 1. a American Medical Association , USA . 2. b Association of American Medical Colleges , USA . 3. c Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada , Canada . 4. d Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation , Republic of Korea . 5. e Taiwan Medical Accreditation Council , Taiwan . 6. f University of Chicago , USA . 7. g Committee on Accreditation of Canadian Medical Schools , Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accreditation reviews of medical schools typically occur at fixed intervals and result in a summative judgment about compliance with predefined process and outcome standards. However, reviews that only occur periodically may not be optimal for ensuring prompt identification of and remediation of problem areas. AIMS: To identify the factors that affect the ability to implement a continuous quality improvement (CQI) process for the interval review of accreditation standards. METHODS: Case examples from the United States, Canada, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, were collected and analyzed to determine the strengths and challenges of the CQI processes implemented by a national association of medical schools and several medical school accrediting bodies. The CQI process at a single medical school also was reviewed. RESULTS: A functional CQI process should be focused directly on accreditation standards so as to result in the improvement of educational quality and outcomes, be feasible to implement, avoid duplication of effort and have both commitment and resource support from the sponsoring entity and the individual medical schools. CONCLUSIONS: CQI can enhance educational program quality and outcomes, if the process is designed to collect relevant information and the results are used for program improvement.
BACKGROUND: Accreditation reviews of medical schools typically occur at fixed intervals and result in a summative judgment about compliance with predefined process and outcome standards. However, reviews that only occur periodically may not be optimal for ensuring prompt identification of and remediation of problem areas. AIMS: To identify the factors that affect the ability to implement a continuous quality improvement (CQI) process for the interval review of accreditation standards. METHODS: Case examples from the United States, Canada, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, were collected and analyzed to determine the strengths and challenges of the CQI processes implemented by a national association of medical schools and several medical school accrediting bodies. The CQI process at a single medical school also was reviewed. RESULTS: A functional CQI process should be focused directly on accreditation standards so as to result in the improvement of educational quality and outcomes, be feasible to implement, avoid duplication of effort and have both commitment and resource support from the sponsoring entity and the individual medical schools. CONCLUSIONS: CQI can enhance educational program quality and outcomes, if the process is designed to collect relevant information and the results are used for program improvement.
Authors: Andrea L Porter; Edward C Portillo; Casey E Gallimore; Joseph A Zorek; Susanne G Barnett Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Nesibe Akdemir; Kiki M J M H Lombarts; Emma Paternotte; Bas Schreuder; Fedde Scheele Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2017-06-02 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Guy W G Bendermacher; Willem S De Grave; Ineke H A P Wolfhagen; Diana H J M Dolmans; Mirjam G A Oude Egbrink Journal: Acad Med Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 7.840