| Literature DB >> 32932916 |
Yilin Hou1,2, Yuanyuan Zhao1,2, Yu Li1,2.
Abstract
Comparative molecular similarity index analysis (CoMSIA) was used to establish a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) model with structural parameters of quinolones as the independent variables and plasma protein binding rate (logfb) as the dependent variable to predict the logfb values of remaining quinolones in this study. In addition, the mono-substituted and bis-substituted reaction schemes that significantly influenced the plasma protein binding rate of quinolones were determined through an analysis of the 3D-QSAR contour maps. It was found that the replacement of small groups, hydrophobic groups, electronegative groups, or hydrogen bond acceptor groups at the substitution sites significantly reduce the logfb values of quinolone derivatives. Furthermore, the mechanism of decrease in binding rate between trovafloxacin (TRO) derivatives and plasma protein was revealed qualitatively and quantitatively based on molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation. After modification of the target molecule, 11 TRO derivatives with low plasma protein binding rates were screened (reduced by 0.50-24.18%). Compared with the target molecule, the molecular genotoxicity and photodegradability of the TRO derivatives was higher (genotoxicity increased by 4.89-21.36%, and photodegradability increased by 9.04-20.56%), and their bioconcentration was significantly lower (by 36.90-61.41%).Entities:
Keywords: fluoroquinolone; molecular docking; molecular dynamics simulation; molecular modification; plasma protein binding rate; three-dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship
Year: 2020 PMID: 32932916 PMCID: PMC7560044 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17186626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Molecular structure of trovafloxacin.
Experimental and model-predicted value of Logfb.
| No. | Compounds | Experiment | Predicted | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 a | Nalidixic acid | 1.968 | 1.966 | −0.13% |
| 2 a | Oxolinic Acid | 1.886 | 1.893 | 0.35% |
| 3 a | Cinoxacin | 1.833 | 1.830 | −0.14% |
| 4 b | Rosoxacin | 1.908 | 1.871 | −1.96% |
| 5 a | Norfloxacin | 1.415 | 1.417 | 0.14% |
| 6 a | Enoxacin | 1.544 | 1.551 | 0.45% |
| 7 a | Ciprofloxacin | 1.362 | 1.364 | 0.17% |
| 8 a | Enrofloxacin | 1.544 | 1.526 | −1.17% |
| 9 a | Difloxacin | 1.531 | 1.536 | 0.30% |
| 10 a | Temafloxacin | 1.447 | 1.438 | −0.63% |
| 11 b | Ofloxacin | 1.398 | 1.623 | 16.10% |
| 12 a | Levofloxacin | 1.380 | 1.394 | 1.00% |
| 13 b | Rufloxacin | 1.785 | 1.708 | −4.33% |
| 14 a | Fleroxacin | 1.462 | 1.457 | −0.37% |
| 15 a | Sparfloxacin | 1.362 | 1.362 | 0.02% |
| 16 a | Trovafloxacin | 1.748 | 1.749 | 0.05% |
a Training set; b Test set.
Figure 2Contour maps of CoMSIA model, steric fields (a); electrostatic fields (b); hydrophobic fields (c); hydrogen-bond donor field (d); and hydrogen bond receptor field (e).
Predicted results of logfb and pLOEC of TRO derivatives.
| No. | Structure | log | Relative Error (%) | pLOEC | Relative Error (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derivative-1 | 1-NO2-Trovafloxacin | 1.738 | 54.702 | −2.32% | 8.102 | 4.89% |
| Derivative-2 | 1-C2H5-Trovafloxacin | 1.738 | 54.702 | −2.32% | 8.203 | 6.20% |
| Derivative-3 | 1-C3H7-Trovafloxacin | 1.724 | 52.966 | −5.42% | 8.445 | 9.33% |
| Derivative-4 | 5-SiH3-Trovafloxacin | 1.722 | 52.723 | −5.85% | 9.374 | 21.36% |
| Derivative-5 | 5-PH2-Trovafloxacin | 1.721 | 52.602 | −6.07% | 9.166 | 18.67% |
| Derivative-6 | 1-NO2-5-SiH3-Trovafloxacin | 1.746 | 55.719 | −0.50% | 8.830 | 14.32% |
| Derivative-7 | 1-OCH3-5-SiH3-Trovafloxacin | 1.735 | 54.325 | −2.99% | 9.008 | 16.62% |
| Derivative-8 | 1-OCH3-5-PH2-Trovafloxacin | 1.736 | 54.450 | −2.77% | 8.650 | 11.99% |
| Derivative-9 | 1-SH-5-PH2-Trovafloxacin | 1.733 | 54.075 | −3.44% | 8.856 | 14.66% |
| Derivative-10 | 1-C2H5-5-PH2-Trovafloxacin | 1.628 | 42.462 | −24.18% | 8.594 | 11.26% |
| Derivative-11 | 1-C3H7-5-PH2-Trovafloxacin | 1.648 | 44.463 | −20.60% | 8.821 | 14.20% |
| Derivative-12 | 1-H-Trovafloxacin | 1.778 | 59.979 | 7.11% | 7.684 | −0.52% |
| Derivative-13 | 1-CH3-Trovafloxacin | 1.769 | 58.749 | 4.91% | 8.023 | 3.87% |
| Derivative-14 | 1-C2H3 -Trovafloxacin | 1.756 | 57.016 | 1.82% | 8.061 | 4.36% |
| Derivative-15 | 1-OCH3 -Trovafloxacin | 1.772 | 59.156 | 5.64% | 8.012 | 3.73% |
| Derivative-16 | 1-SH -Trovafloxacin | 1.770 | 58.884 | 5.15% | 8.156 | 5.59% |
Predicted logKow and logt1/2 values of quinolone derivatives using QSAR models.
| No. | log | Relative Error (%) | log | Relative Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trovafloxacin | 2.436 | 2.267 | ||
| Derivative-1 | 0.940 | −61.41% | 1.801 | −20.56% |
| Derivative-2 | 1.537 | −36.90% | 1.994 | −12.04% |
| Derivative-3 | 1.226 | −49.67% | 1.819 | −19.76% |
| Derivative-4 | 1.319 | −45.85% | 2.001 | −11.73% |
| Derivative-5 | 1.173 | −51.85% | 1.988 | −12.31% |
| Derivative-6 | 0.991 | −59.32% | 1.806 | −20.34% |
| Derivative-7 | 1.490 | −38.83% | 2.031 | −10.41% |
| Derivative-8 | 1.412 | −42.04% | 2.062 | −9.04% |
| Derivative-9 | 1.396 | −42.69% | 2.006 | −11.51% |
| Derivative-10 | 1.166 | −52.13% | 2.023 | −10.76% |
| Derivative-11 | 1.182 | −51.48% | 2.032 | −10.37% |
Positive frequency calculations of quinolone derivatives.
| No. | Frequency Value (cm−1) | No. | Frequency Value (cm−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Derivative-1 | 15.16 | Derivative-7 | 14.6 |
| Derivative-2 | 13.77 | Derivative-8 | 15.14 |
| Derivative-3 | 13.79 | Derivative-9 | 15.29 |
| Derivative-4 | 18.05 | Derivative-10 | 9.69 |
| Derivative-5 | 14.25 | Derivative-11 | 14.81 |
| Derivative-6 | 18.65 |
Figure 3Substitution reaction paths of quinolone derivatives.
Gibbs free energy change (ΔG) of quinolones’ substitution reaction paths.
| Reaction Paths | Gibbs Free Energy/(a.u.) | ΔG/(kcal·mol−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| For Reactants | For Products | ||
| Path 1 | −1704.0287 | −1720.0301 | −10,041.0544 |
| Path 2 | −1578.1252 | −1594.1148 | −10,033.6265 |
| Path 3 | −1617.4133 | −1633.4027 | −10,033.5255 |
| Path 4 | −1790.2267 | −1806.2479 | −10,053.4834 |
| Path 5 | −1841.3928 | −1858.0118 | −10,428.5490 |
| Path 6 | −1995.2549 | −2011.2238 | −10,020.6509 |
| Path 7 | −1905.2647 | −1921.2198 | −10,011.9674 |
| Path 8 | −1956.4308 | −1972.9852 | −10,388.0100 |
| Path 9 | −2240.1455 | −2256.6822 | −10,376.9232 |
| Path 10 | −1920.5175 | −1937.0769 | −10,391.2134 |
| Path 11 | −1959.8056 | −1976.3648 | −10,391.0352 |
Docking results of target molecule and TRO derivatives with plasma protein.
| No. | Libdock Scores | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| Trovafloxacin | 74.7975 | |
| Derivative-1 | 81.1813 | 8.53% |
| Derivative-2 | 65.8328 | −11.99% |
| Derivative-3 | 67.9220 | −9.19% |
| Derivative-4 | 66.0899 | −11.64% |
| Derivative-5 | 63.7173 | −14.81% |
| Derivative-6 | 64.7691 | −13.41% |
| Derivative-7 | 66.6251 | −10.93% |
| Derivative-8 | 68.0351 | −9.04% |
| Derivative-9 | 64.7427 | −13.44% |
| Derivative-10 | 56.5253 | −24.43% |
| Derivative-11 | 61.4623 | −17.83% |
The number of hydrophilic/hydrophobic amino acid residue that trovafloxacin and derivative-10 bound to plasma protein.
| Amino Acid Residues | Character | Number of Amino Acid Residues | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trovafloxacin | Derivative-10 | ||
| Leu | hydrophobic | 2 | 1 |
| Val | hydrophobic | 2 | 2 |
| Phe | hydrophobic | 1 | 0 |
| Met | hydrophobic | 1 | 0 |
| Ala | hydrophobic | 2 | 1 |
| Tyr | hydrophobic | 1 | 1 |
| Gln | hydrophilic | 2 | 2 |
| Arg | hydrophilic | 1 | 2 |
| Lys | hydrophilic | 0 | 1 |
| Pro | hydrophobic | 0 | 1 |
Figure 4Molecular docking of trovafloxacin and derivative-10 with plasma protein (ID:5NU7).
Figure 5Binding conformation of trovafloxacin and derivative-10 with plasma protein ligand in binding domain.
Distances between trovafloxacin and derivative-10 and hydrophilic amino acid residues at the plasma protein binding site.
| Compounds | Hydrophilic Amino Acid Residues | Distance from 1-Substituent (Å) | Average Distance (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trovafloxacin | Gln149 | 5.9 | 7.2 |
| Gln156 | 7.6 | ||
| Arg153 | 8.2 | ||
| Derivative-10 | Gln149 | 6.2 | 10.2 |
| Gln156 | 9.0 | ||
| Arg153 | 12.1 | ||
| Arg166 | 17.5 | ||
| Lys150 | 6.1 |
Figure 6RMSD and RMSF curves of trovafloxacin and derivative-10 binding to plasma protein. (a): RMSD; (b): RMSF.
Figure 7Potential energy and total energy trajectory of trovafloxacin and derivative-10 binding to plasma protein. (a): potential energy of trovafloxacin; (b): total energy of trovafloxacin; (c): potential energy of derivative-10; (d): total energy of derivative-10.