Literature DB >> 32931620

Using formative evaluation to plan for electronic psychosocial screening in pediatric oncology.

Jordan Gilleland Marchak1,2, Sean N Halpin3, Cam Escoffery3, Shadé Owolabi3, Ann C Mertens1,2, Karen Wasilewski-Masker1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate how formative research methods can be used to plan for implementation of evidence-based psychosocial screening in pediatric oncology.
METHODS: Multidisciplinary pediatric oncology professionals participated in focus groups to adapt the distress thermometer for electronic administration and develop health systems processes to promote psychosocial screening in the pediatric oncology outpatient clinic setting. Seven 1-hour focus groups were conducted using a structured guide based on the reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework and transcribed verbatim. Two independent raters coded transcripts using a quasi-deductive approach with high inter-coder reliability (Cohen kappa >0.80).
RESULTS: Participants' (N = 44) responses were used to identify overarching topics related to the adoption, implementation, and maintenance of electronic screening (e-screening) including: barriers to meeting families' psychosocial needs, identification of champions, suggestions to adapt the proposed e-screening program, perceived barriers to e-screening, and potential impact of carrying out e-screening. Following review of qualitative data, we employed specific implementation strategies to promote adoption, implementation, and maintenance of an e-screening program.
CONCLUSIONS: Perceived barriers to the implementation of psychosocial screening remain substantial, yet enthusiasm for using electronic health records (EHRs) technology to help meet patient needs through regular assessment was evident among pediatric oncology professionals. Electronic administration of screening and integration of results into the EHR in real time were identified as critical needs to overcome barriers to e-screening. Formative research including qualitative data from stakeholders can be used to tailor implementation strategies to successfully support the adoption, implementation, and maintenance of e-screening programs in pediatric oncology.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic health records; health care; pediatrics; process assessment; psycho-oncology; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32931620      PMCID: PMC8021476          DOI: 10.1002/pon.5550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  40 in total

1.  Are the psychological needs of adolescent survivors of pediatric cancer adequately identified and treated?

Authors:  Lisa S Kahalley; Stephanie J Wilson; Vida L Tyc; Heather M Conklin; Melissa M Hudson; Shengjie Wu; Xiaoping Xiong; Heather H Stancel; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Delivery of care consistent with the psychosocial standards in pediatric cancer: Current practices in the United States.

Authors:  Michele A Scialla; Kimberly S Canter; Fang Fang Chen; E Anders Kolb; Eric Sandler; Lori Wiener; Anne E Kazak
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Feasibility of clinical psychosocial screening in pediatric oncology: Implementing the PAT2.0.

Authors:  Maria C McCarthy; Claire E Wakefield; Sharon DeGraves; Madeleine Bowden; Deborah Eyles; Lauren K Williams
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2016-07-11

4.  Successful strategies for implementing biopsychosocial screening.

Authors:  Matthew Loscalzo; Karen Lynn Clark; Jimmie Holland
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Economic impact of advanced pediatric cancer on families.

Authors:  Kira Bona; Veronica Dussel; Liliana Orellana; Tammy Kang; Russ Geyer; Chris Feudtner; Joanne Wolfe
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 6.  Standards of Psychosocial Care for Parents of Children With Cancer.

Authors:  Julia A Kearney; Christina G Salley; Anna C Muriel
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Perceived benefits of and barriers to psychosocial risk screening in pediatric oncology by health care providers.

Authors:  Maru Barrera; Sarah Alexander; Wendy Shama; Denise Mills; Leandra Desjardins; Kelly Hancock
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Patient reported outcomes in pediatric oncology practice: suggestions for future usage by parents and pediatric oncologists.

Authors:  S A Schepers; V E Engelen; L Haverman; H N Caron; P M Hoogerbrugge; G J L Kaspers; R M Egeler; M A Grootenhuis
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  A comparison of psychometric properties between internet and paper versions of two depression instruments (BDI-II and MADRS-S) administered to clinic patients.

Authors:  Fredrik Holländare; Gerhard Andersson; Ingemar Engström
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Online versus paper-based screening for depression and anxiety in adults with cystic fibrosis in Ireland: a cross-sectional exploratory study.

Authors:  Jennifer Cronly; Alistair J Duff; Kristin A Riekert; Ivan J Perry; Anthony P Fitzgerald; Aine Horgan; Elaine Lehane; Barbara Howe; Muireann Ni Chroinin; Eileen Savage
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.